Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 6

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Fertigation in conjunction with traditional spread fertilization could improve the growth and yield of highbush blueberry. Study was conducted in the years 2002–2004 on a 10-year old plantation of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. The effect of fertigation with 3 nutrient solutions (F-1, F-2, F-3) was investigated in comparison to drip irrigation (F-0) on growth and yield of highbush blueberry. Fertigation with nutrient solution F-1 containing (in mg·dm-3): 100 (N-NH4+N-NO3), 30 P-PO4, 60 K, 30 Mg, 0.30 B and 0.03 Mo, and from the water contents of 84.5 Ca, 47.9 S-SO4, 4.8 Na, 6.6 Cl, 0.160 Fe, 0.054 Mn, 0.041 Zn and 0.009 Cu (pH 5.50, EC 1.10 mS·cm-1) had a positive effect (in comparison to the drip irrigation) on the fruit yield and single fruit mass of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. An increase of nutrient contents in nutrient solution F-2 to the level of (in mg·dm-3): 150 (N-NH4+N-NO3), 45 P-PO4, 90 K, 45 Mg, 0.30 B and 0.03 Mo (the others as in F-1; pH 5.50 and EC 1.45 mS·cm-1) did not reduce the yield in relation to F-1, while it lowered the mass of one fruit. Yields of highbush blueberry under the influence of drip fertigation in relation to drip irrigation (F-0), at the optimal soil fertility obtained on the basis of spread fertilization, increased as follows: F-1 at 17.3%, F-2 at 21.9% and F-3 at 5.3%. The greatest effect of fertigation on yield of highbush blueberry was found in the year of soil drought, in which the highest rates of nutrient solutions F-1 and F-2 were applied. Fertigation with the nutrient solutions F-1 to F-3 increased dry matter contents of fruits, however it was lower than in drip irrigation. No nitrates or nitrites were detected in fruits of highbush blueberry. Highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’ is a plant with high nutrient requirement. Average yearly nutrient rates for 10–13 years old plantation applied with the treatments F-1 and F-2 (sum of spread fertilization and fertigation) were: 19–24 g N, 10–12 g P, 7–10 g K, 9 g Ca, 6–8 g Mg and 4 g S·m-2·bush-1. For horticultural practice the nutrient solution F-1 could be recommended because of its advantageous effect on yield and the lowest fertilizer expenditure.
Fertigation with the nutrient solutions containing macro and microelements could influence on the nutrient status of highbush blueberry. Studies were conducted in the years 2002–2004 on a 10-year old plantation of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. The aim was to analyze the effect of fertigation using 3 nutrient solutions (F-1, F-2, F-3) in comparison to drip irrigation (F-0) on the contents of macro- and microelements as well as sodium and aluminium in leaves. Fertigation with nutrient solutions F-1, F-2 and F-3 in relation to drip irrigation (F-0) increased the contents of nitrogen, potassium and calcium in the leaves of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’ at both terms of leaves collection (15.06 and 15.07) while it reduced the content of magnesium with the application of nutrient solutions F-2 and F-3 at the second term of study. No distinct effect of fertigation on the contents of phosphorus and sulphur in leaves was found. Among microelements the greatest effect of fertigation was indicated for boron. Nutrient solutions F-2 and F-3 at the first term as well as F-1, F-2 and F-3 at the second one increased boron content in leaves. Fertigation was found to have an effect on the increase of manganese and copper contents at the term II and zinc at the term I. No variation was recorded in iron content in leaves under the influence of fertigation. Fertigation reduced the content of aluminium in leaves of highbush blueberry. The effect was shown mainly under the influence of the application of nutrient solution F-2. Contents of N, P, K, Zn, Na and B decreased but Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn and Al increased in leaves between the first (15.06) and second II (15.07) term of study. No changes were found in contents of S or Cu in leaves of highbush blueberry at both sampling terms. For the evaluation of highbush blueberry nutrition status in Poland the term II seems to be more advantageous. It is the second half of July, after the first harvest of cv. „Bluecrop”. In this period there is the stabilization of vegetative growth with marked effects of bushes yielding.
Application of nutrient solutions in fertigation could change chemical properties of soil. Nutrient solutions for highbush blueberry are specific because of characteristic relations among nutrients and acid reaction. Investigations were conducted in the years 2002–2004 on a 10-year old plantation of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. There were searched effects of fertigation using 3 nutrient solutions (F-1, F-2, F-3) contained increased levels of N-NH, N-NO3, P, K, Mg and constant B and Mo (Ca, S-SO4, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu from water) on the contents of nutrients, sodium and aluminium in soil. Fertigation of nutrient solutions F-1, F-2, F-3, in relation to drip irrigation F-0, resulted in the increasing contents of K, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in the plough layer (0–20 cm), while the nutrient solutions F-2 and F-3 upraised the contents of P, S-SO4 and B. The effect of fertigation on the increase of nutrient contents in the subplough layer (20–40 cm) was pointed out mainly for K and Mg. As a result of fertigation with the highest nutrient contents (F-3) the contents of N-NO3 increased in the subplough layer. In both layers a tendency to increase of N-NO3 was noted. Fertigation with nutrient solution F-3 reduced the content of chlorides, while F-2 and F-3 sodium in the plough layer. As a consequence of fertigation with nutrient solutions F-2 and F-3 having pH 5.50 the lowering of soil pH in the plough layer (0–20 cm) was indicated in comparison to drip irrigation (pH of water 7.37). No effect of fertigation was found in the pH of the subplough layer (20–40 cm). As a result of a reduced soil pH the content of aluminium in the plough layer increased. Fertigation with nutrient solutions F-1 to F-3, in relation to drip irrigation F-0, resulted in an increased of EC of the plough and partly in the subplough layer.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.