Ograniczanie wyników

Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The authors outline the general bases of possible scientific development in motor control, and they argue that in this discipline it is theoretical conceptualization rather than empirical investigations, that is of crucial importance. Moreover, the bulk of motor control as a science remains an area hardly accessible to empirical researchers. The authors present three ways of anticipation: induction, abduction, and deduction. They propose taking abductive methodology and employing a systemic approach to theory development. Next, they present two important principles determining the motor behavior of human individuals: the “inverted-V principle” and the “descending firework principle”. The theoretical concepts make the “abductive part” of the paper, and then the authors take the “deductive way” and show how the described principles act in three typical daily life situations.
The authors examine the issue of consciousness from a systemic-theoretical perspective, not based on experimental research. They argue that psychological problems are so distant – in intellectual terms – from reality that tracing the relations between observable, experimentally measurable phenomena and internal processes in mind seems to be almost impossible. Moreover, the whole system of information processing in humans – including consciousness – is of multimodal nature, which makes all analyses rather difficult. As a result, it appears impossible to assign unambiguously psychological processes to observable phenomena. Thus, the authors propose to apply a mental technique termed “interpretation of the best explanation” based on the five-level construction of movement theory by N.A. Bernstein (systemic, in fact) and a less detailed motor theory of language by R. Allott. They propose the definition of the term “consciousness” and show its place in the whole chain of events determining human behavior. By using Bernstein’s theory, they define the terms “real consciousness”, “virtual consciousness”, “potential consciousness” and “active consciousness”, coherent with the theory of attention by R.M. Nideffer. They compare the issues under consideration with problems of physics and draw a conclusion that the questions of mechanisms determining animal and human behavior – the only observable manifestation of which is a movement – are probably most challenging to the whole contemporary science.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.