Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) of the thalamus is an important structure of the circadian timing system. Its primary role is the integration of both photic and non-photic stimuli relevant for the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle. The consolidated information is then transmitted to the main generator of circadian rhythms – the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). As the non-photic cues are delivered to the IGL via non-specific projections of the brainstem, we chose to investigate how one projec‑ tion, the norepinephrine (NE) system from the locus coe‑ ruleus (LC), influences IGL neuronal activity. Moreover, we divided recorded cells into two groups, anticipating that they reflect two different projections arising from the IGL. The first group, expressing T-type calcium cur‑ rent (T-type cells), putatively comprises the connection between the leaflets located in both hemispheres, while A-type potassium current expressing neurons (or A-type cells) most likely transmit information to the SCN. The influence of NE on IGL neurons was tested by patch clamp recordings in the current clamp mode on 250 μm brain slices from 2/3-week-old male Wistar rats. In each instance NE (20 μM) was applied twice, the second ap‑ plication in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX, 0.5 μM), to determine if the observed effect was postsynaptic or presynaptic. Both substances were applied by bath per‑ fusion. After the experiment, slices were immunostained against the neuropeptide Y to confirm that the recorded cell was within the borders of the IGL. For this purpose, ExtrAvidinCy3 (1:250) and anti-NPY antibodies (1:8000) were used. NE was shown to elicit a direct effect on a ma‑ jority of IGL neurons. The effects were diverse; however, all A-type cells, and most T-type cells, responded with depolarization. Some neurons within the T-type group showed no response and, interestingly, a few neurons were hyperpolarized. Our study shows for the first time the electrophysiological effects of NE on the neuronal activity of single IGL neurons. The variety of respons‑ es, probably through activation of different receptors, requires further study. We predict that the diverse re‑ sponses reflect the differential impact of NE on neurons foming different projections, but the variety of respons‑ es from the T-type cells indicate that this group may be more complex and consist of additional subpopulations.
INTRODUCTION: The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) is an important structure of the circadian timing system, involved in the integration of photic and non-photic information. The IGL receives input from the retina, as well as from many non‑specific projections of the brainstem, which provide it with all the non-photic information needed for synchronization of circadian rhythmicity. One of the non‑specific projections is the norepinephrine system, extending from the locus coeruleus throughout the brain. Norepinephrine in the central nervous system is involved in the mechanism of arousal, and therefore enhance cognitive processes such as attention and memory. However, how it regulates the circadian system via the IGL has not yet been described. AIM(S): The aim of the study was to determine whether and how the norepinephrine (NE) can modulate the activity of single IGL neurons. METHOD(S): The method used in this experiment was a whole-cell patch clamp on brain slices from 2/3-week-old Wistar rats. Norepinephrine and tetrodotoxin (TTX) were applied by bath perfusion. After each experiment, slices were immunostained to verify the localization of the recorded cell in the IGL. RESULTS: Both depolarization and hyperpolarization of the IGL neurons were observed after NE application. In most cases the effect was postsynaptic, however, there were also a few cells which showed no direct response after norepinephrine application in the TTX solution. CONCLUSIONS: Norepinephrine elicits different effects on IGL neuronal activity. The expression of different types of noradrenergic receptors in IGL cells’ membrane could be a reason for such various types of responses. We believe that NE acts in the IGL as an activity modulator, which regulates its responses to other cues. To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing the effect of norepinephrine on IGL neuronal activity. FINANCIAL SUPPORT: This work is supported by grant obtained from the Institute of Zoology: DS/MND/WBiNoZ/ IZ/29/2016.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.