Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 5

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The purpose of the article is to analyse the methods of spatial planning of tourist and recreational areas on the basis of planning documents in force in the selected tourist communes: Karpacz, Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Lądek Zdrój, Mikołajki, Rewal, Międzyzdroje and Ryn. The choice of communes constituting the representative group was made on the basis of quality and quantity criteria of tourist attraction and location of these communes in tourist regions. The adopted method was the analysis of the binding studies of conditions and directions of development, local plans, their correlation and compliance with the legal regulations concerned with spatial planning.On the basis of the conducted analyses it was stated that lack of precise regulations ordering the issues of spatial planning has led to extremely different models of planning tourist and recreational areas as regards their quality. The current legal framework is insufficient in regulating the principles of development of the analysed areas. The situation may be remedied by changing the regulations that define the criteria of qualifying communes as tourist communes and the resulting duty of a wider and more comprehensive approach to the analysed issues in the structure of the planning documents.
The goal of the article is to start a discussion on the possibility of planning tourist and recreational functions in the Polish system of spatial planning. The method the author has adopted is an analysis of the texts of the binding legal acts on spatial planning and development of tourism and recreation. Assessment was carried out of the legal regulations concerned with the planning documents on the national, regional and commune level. Analysis was done of the correlation between these documents and their impact on the structure of spatial planning of tourist areas. A series of executive acts related to the subject topic was listed with regard to their cohesion with the legal system and their implications. On the basis of the studies that were carried out a series of difficulties was discovered in the approach to the problem of tourism development on the various levels of spatial planning. They usually result from the fact that planning documents are too generic and that they are not cohesive with the executive acts.
Counteracting the phenomenon of chaotic urbanisation in the suburban areas relies on protection of open terrains, formation of greenery areas and intensification of development in the areas assigned for construction. The communes of Lesznowola and Michałowice that border with Warsaw in the south-western part of the outer zone of the Metropolis Area of Warsaw undergo particularly strong urban pressure. The analysis of the planning documents in both of the communes shows that there are significant differences in the ways the local self-governments handle the issues of spatial planning and management. The commune of Lesznowola (area of 6917 ha, population of 21 469 in 2011) adopted the policy of expansive urbanisation of agricultural areas. It is to be emphasized that the strategy of development and the study of conditions and directions do not sufficiently recognize the phenomena and processes that have impact on spatial management. The problems that require solution with reference to public interest were not identified. The diagnostic section of the study of conditions and directions does not contain any demographic forecast in options (estimated population of 33.9 thousand in 2020). There is no reference to the state and changes in the way areas are used and developed (virtually and according to the plans). No area needs were specified with regard to the financing of infrastructure and balancing the real estate market. Defects of the concept section of the study of conditions and directions include the non-existent vision of the commune management, lack of division into structural units, excessive flexibility of decisions, no public areas designated, no balance of areas and staging of development. 90 per cent of the commune area is covered with local plans. 3033.65 ha were assigned for build-up [A. Olbrysz, 2011]. Most of the plans were prepared in order to change the function of the covered areas from agricultural to construction plots. In general, these plans do not sufficiently regulate the way of managing and developing the areas giving the investors too much freedom. Most of the areas were assigned for residential detached houses. There are no areas for public services, arranged greenery, public squares. The commune of Michałowice (area of 3488 ha, population of 11934 in 2011) runs a more rational spatial policy. Its study of conditions and directions contains requirements of spatial management resulting from demographic development (in 2020 population of 18.3 thousand in the first option and 22.0 thousand in the second option), up-to-date function, development of infrastructure, state of spatial organization and the requirements connected with its protection, needs and opportunities of commune development. The concept of spatial management contains the idea of complementary development of the areas that are already designated as construction areas, necessity of limiting build-up and development of new areas because of the cost of infrastructure construction (especially purchase of land for roads and the necessity of creating land reserves for further development. There is a balance of areas according to the adopted policy and demographic absorption of areas. In the study of conditions and directions 2017 ha was assigned for construction including 1427 ha for residential purposes. Local land management plans cover 50 per cent of the commune. Just like in Lesznowola, most of the areas are assigned for detached houses with services. Areas for public services were assigned and the kinds of these services were specified. Areas for arranged and non-arranged greenery were designated, and in 2 villages (Reguły and Komorów) public squares were planned. The excessive and uncontrolled urbanisation of the commune of Lesznowola has caused its financial problems. The cost of land purchase for roads, as specified in the local land management plans, is estimated for ca. 597.5 million PLN [A. Olbrysz, 2011]. Lesznowola is one of the fifty most indebted communes in Poland [K. Kluza, 2013].
In order to explain whether, to what extent and in which elements the content of the local plans of spatial development (lpsd) favour the negative phenomena of suburbanisation, the analysis of the lpsd in five sub-Warsaw communes (Lesznowola, Michałowice, Raszyn, Kobyłka, Sulejówek) were carried out. The studies covered the scope and degree of detail of the content related to the purpose of the areas covered by the plans and the methods that are used to form development, public services, public areas (including arranged greenery areas) and the road communication system. The assessment of the content related to planning was based on the criterion of respecting the principles of forming spatial order, sustainable development and rationality of planning decisions. On the basis of the analysis of 141 lpsd some defects of most plans may be depicted, namely: - weak variability of the spatial and functional structure of the areas covered by the plans, - no areas assigned for social infrastructure objects, including designation of the kind of services, - insufficient public areas particularly arranged greenery areas and squares, - insufficient definition of the standards of development formation, - frequently designated minimum setback, and not the fixed one, that have a larger impact on space formation, - no comprehensive road communication system solutions; acceptance of internal road designation by investors. The content of the lpsd are too flexible and imprecise. The scope of decisions in many of the plans is limited; some of them even lack decisions that are imposed by the law. Few plans exclude development in agricultural areas to prevent scattered development. The balance of the areas covered by the plans according to their purpose, developed for 2 of the communes, showed a significant excess of undeveloped areas (65% of undeveloped areas in the general area of construction areas in the commune of Lesznowola and 47.6 % in the commune of Michałowice). Such plans cannot constitute a basis of spatial formation and sustainable development of social management elements. They are not creative, they do not impose solutions concerning the formation of residential development, services network and road system. The excess of construction areas in relation to the investment needs favours scattering of development. The studies showed a connection between the quality of the lpsd and the quality of the study of conditions and directions of spatial management (study of cdsm). The communes that made errors when defining its spatial policy during the works on the study of cdsm have defective local regulations related to spatial management. It seems necessary to control both the local plans and the studies of cdsm not only from the point of view of following the law but also in terms of their substantive value.
In order to clarify whether, to what extent and in what elements the arrangements of planning documents of suburban municipalities contribute to spontaneous, chaotic suburbanization, in the Institute of Spatial Management and Housing in Warsaw, in 2013 was taken the research task titled „Flawed suburbanization and the quality of the planning documents of municipalities”. The subject of detailed study are: development strategy, the study of conditions and directions of spatial development (study) and local spatial development plans (l.s.d.p.) of selected municipalities in the outer zone of Warsaw Metropolitan Area (WMA). This article presents preliminary results of studies, based on the analysis and evaluation of the planning documents of two communes of rural community status - Lesznowola and Michałowice. They have borders with the capital city in the south-western part of the outer zone of WMA, which is subject to particularly strong pressure of urbanization. Analysis of existing in both municipalities planning documents, indicate significant differences in the modes of operation of local governments in planning and spatial management. Municipality of Lesznowola (6,917 ha, 21,469 inhabitants in 2011) adopted a policy of expansive urbanization of agricultural areas. In the Strategy, and in the Study, the phenomena and processes that have an impact on spatial development was not recognized sufficiently, as well as problems to be resolved taking public interest into consideration were not identified. Diagnostic section of the Study does not provide forecasts of demographic variations (assumed 33.9 thousand. people in 2020), the state and changes in the structure and land use was not recognized (actual and established in the plans), local needs were not assessed (including i.a. possibilities of financing by the municipal infrastructure development and ensuring a balance of the real estate market). Disadvantages of conceptual part of the Study are: lack of municipality development vision, lack of territory division on the structural units, excessive arrangements flexibility, lack of designated public spaces, lack of the areas balance as determined by the Study, lack of development staging. Local plans covered 90% of the municipality’s territory. In those plans earmarked 3933.65 ha for development. Most l.s.d.p. prepared for reassignment of agricultural areas for building estate. Generally, the plans do not sufficiently regulate land use and building areas, allowing investors to too high degree of freedom in the space forming. Most of the areas earmarked for single-family housing development. Do not secured land for public services, organised green spaces and public squares. Municipality of Michałowice (3,488 ha, 11,934 inhabitants in 2011) leads a more balanced spatial policy. In the Study, spatial management development conditions were diagnosed, they resulting from: demographic development (in the year 2020 18.3 thousand in the first variant and 22.0 thousand in the second variant), the current destination, land development and equipment, the state of spatial order and requirements of its protection, needs and opportunities for municipality development. The concept of spatial management included: the ability to complete already designated by the plan building areas, the need to reduce development and management of new areas due to the costs of infrastructure (in particular the purchase of land for roads) and the need for a areas reserve for a further period. The balance of areas according to the policy and absorbency demographic areas was presented. The Study earmarked 2,017 ha for development, including 1,427 ha for housing. Local plans were prepared for 50% of the municipality area. Similarly to in Lesznowola, in the l.s.d.p, most of the land earmarked for the single-family housing development with services. Areas for public services were designated and their types were specified. Green and undeveloped areas were also determined, and in two locations (Reguły and Komorów) - public squares were indicated. Excessive and uncontrolled urbanization of Lesznowola, caused its financial problems. The costs of land for roads acquisition, established in the l.s.d.p, estimated at approximately PLN 597.5 million.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.