Ograniczanie wyników

Czasopisma help

  1. 2 Człowiek i Środowisko

Autorzy help

  1. 2 Sieminski W.

Lata help

  1. 1 2015

  2. 1 2014

Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  space formation
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
1

Public participation in spatial planning and formation of space - change directions

100%
Sieminski W.
Człowiek i Środowisko
|
2015
|
tom 39
|
nr 3
Because of the spaciousness of the analyses carried out in the last sub-task of the research task (Legal status of public participation in spatial planning) they are going to be presented in a separate article. The above description of the 4/5 of the research task leads to a number of conclusions that are not taken into account often enough in discussions and postulations concerning public participation. The feverishness and haste in waiting for the effects of public participation in spatial planning should be tempered with a short history (short life) of this phenomenon. Additionally, it is not possible to treat public participation, particularly in spatial planning, exclusively as a fulfilment of the democratic postulation of giving more authority to citizens. In this respect the citizens should acquire appropriate knowledge and skills without which it is not possible to imagine spatial design. It is nowadays typical that types (models) of public participation are confused. Informing, consulting, etc. are only tools of participation. The type of spontaneous participation we discriminated seems to be the most frequent way of civil participation in spatial planning in Poland right now. It is often conflicting participation that does not have its place in public participation based on consensus as is initiated and coordinated by official institutions or public administration. This shows that Poland’s spatial management has a conflict triggering nature. As a phenomenon that broadens democratic practices public participation in spatial planning and formation of space may be developed and enhanced. However, it is too often considered that this enhancement should rely on creating new (and enhancing the existing) instruments of participation – methods and techniques whereas also pointing at new fragments of social environment and social and spatial problems that are unsolvable without social participation is also a way of enhancement and broadening.
2

Genesis and history of social participation in spatial planning

100%
Sieminski W.
Człowiek i Środowisko
|
2014
|
tom 38
|
nr 2
In this study of the genesis and evolution of social participation in spatial planning (sometimes social pressure was also concerned with operative programmes of revitalisation of city districts and this is why the article also discusses social participation in space formation) I have tried to show that this process is of a complex and multidisciplinary character in which various forms of participation, that are now treated separately, intermingled. Public protests or even riots (chaotic participation) forced the authorities to juridise social participation in spatial planning (passing laws on participation forms) and enhancement of the provisions of the existing laws by their instrumentalisation (equipment) in more or less efficient tools of participation (e.g. advocacy planning or J. Fishkin’s deliberative poll). This is treated as the so-called non-statutory form of social participation in spatial planning. In my opinion, this complex and multidisciplinary process is best presented in a way that is subject to chronology rather than to separate treatment of various phenomena. The chronological attitude used in this article shows that social participation in spatial planning is assessed with pessimism. At the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries the pessimist tone prevails in the assessment of the efficiency of social participation in spatial planning. But this article shows that in the 1970s the tone was quite different – full of optimism and hope, mainly concerned with advocacy planning. This should lead us to the conclusion that verifies the goal of this article, that the short history of social participation in spatial planning tells us we should expect further maturation and development of the participation phenomena.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.