Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 57

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  prawo wspolnotowe
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
In Community law, the term rural tourism is more often used than agro tourism. Neither of the terms though has been given a definition. The aim of this paper is to precise the concept and scope of rural tourism, to identify its subject and objects, and the extent to which it is related to an agricultural holding and agricultural activity. In order to do that, relevant legislation enacted in the last 28 years has been analysed. Since Agenda 2000, rural tourism has been understood much more broadly, and the recent regulation 1698/2005 placed it among projects that are being undertaken by numbers of entities functioning in rural areas. In that regulation, no attention is put to the extent or characteristics of the phenomenon which is treated as an element of rural policy the objective of which is better profitability or higher income of farmers and development of rural areas by different forms of support extended to them. Members states on the other hand have been given the task of forming definitions and criteria of hospitality in rural areas and, possibly, differentiating between rural tourism and agro tourism.
The paper deals with legal conditions and possibilities for income support consolidation in the EU. The Author submits several conclusions on the legal aspects of addressing the issue of differing level of direct payments. Firstly, the question of equalization of income support levels is raised for two separate and independent reasons – one being the loss of legitimacy for significant disparities in amounts of direct support paid out to certain production sectors or regions and the other being the pressure of EU Member States unsatisfied with the principle of historical reference as the cornerstone of the current system. Secondly, the line of case-law of Community courts does not seem to support the relevance of arguments presented at EU forum, according to which equal level of direct payments would be tantamount to treating the beneficiaries of the agricultural policy in an equal way. Thirdly, the instruments introduced recently in the health check of the Common Agricultural Policy aimed at approximating the value of payment entitlements do not address the issue of different support level in a cross-border dimension, thus leaving the problem unanswered up until the next financial perspective.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 3 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.