Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 6

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  mosaic landscape
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The influence of the characteristics of habitat fragments on the dynamics of avian communities and the effect that fragments of different sizes have on the stability of the breeding species composition, and also on local extinction, colonisation and turnover rates were studied in an agricultural landscape in southern Poland. The fragments included various habitat types that differed from the matrix. Breeding birds were surveyed using the territory mapping method to assess turnover. Species composition depended on both the spatial structure of a fragment and the features of its surroundings. Local declines and appearances of species had a similar influence on the turnover in all size classes of the fragments. Species that contributed most to the total turnover were: Lanius collurio, Phasianus colchicus, Anas platyrhynchos, Emberiza schoeniclus, Columba palumbus and Sylvia communis. However, there were differences among species contributing most to the turnover according to area size classes. Heterogeneous habitats in a mosaic-like, agricultural landscape do not function as islands. The existence of species in an area with such a level of habitat patchiness can be related primarily to habitat quality, mainly because of poor isolation and the high permeability of isolating habitats.
Environmental effects of the intensification of agricultural production have a profound impact on the ecological carrying capacity of agricultural landscapes for biodiversity. The recent view of the relationship between biodiversity and landscape structural characteristics showed the importance of the vegetation patch composition, heterogeneity and fragmentation of the habitats, their connectivity and scale dimension for biodiversity protection. There are two kinds of habitat/vegetation diversity in the agricultural landscape: crop fields which form a sort of matrix and the network of semi-natural or perennial patches of vegetation like shelterbelts, small patches of forests, meadows or wetlands. The studies were carried in mosaic and uniform agricultural landscape in west Poland. In the mosaic landscape, small areas of arable fields are presented as well as numerous semi-natural ecosystems being refuges for plants and animals (shelterbelts, small water bodies, strips of meadows, channels etc.). In the uniform landscape, large areas of arable fields and small number of refugial ecosystems are presented. The importance of these two kinds of landscape diversity for the family diversity of aboveground insect communities was studied in the agricultural landscape (Turew area) in Poznan region of Western Poland. The landscape is composed of the large (up to 100 ha area) fields (wheat and corn mostly) and a network of shelterbelts (black locust, oak) planted in the past (XIX century) as well as recently (with more than 10 species of trees). The studies were carried up from 1984 to 2005 in the different vegetation patches, wheat fields and shelterbelts, as well as at different distances from the shelterbelts. Quick-trap method, with a base area of 0.25 m² was used to collect the above-ground insects. 10–20 samples were taken in each series. 133 families were recorded in the 1994–2005 period. The number of recorded families decreased with increasing distance from shelterbelt. This decrease is well described by negative exponential equation with fit measured by determination coefficient R² = 0.97. The mean number of families found in wheat field at the 100 m distance shelterbelt was equal to 52.0 and was higher than their number recorded in wheat fields of the uniform landscape which amounted to 40.9. Groups of occasionally occurring and residential families were also studied. In the mosaic landscape the share of occasionally occurring families in total number of recorded families was equal to 0.29 (36 vs 124). In the uniform landscape, contribution of occasionally occurring families was 0.37 (43 vs 115). The landscape structure had negligible effects on occasionally appearing insects, which can be distributed by wind as well as by other factors, or are on a long-distance migration. The main factors counteracting the decline of biodiversity in agroecosystems are the mosaic structure of the landscape and dispersal properties of insects. Refuges occurring in mosaic land scape counterbalance the loss of insect diversity due to intensification of agriculture production. The influence of landscape structure on recurrence of insect families in consecutive years is so strong that combined changes of climate and crop pattern do not seem to have the significant effect.
We hypothesized that the flight activity of bats in forests is higher in parts closer to edges due to the presence of species roosting in trees and foraging mostly outside as well as those coming to forage from outside. The aim of our study was to test this expectation using bat netting on roads in a forest belt 4–5 km wide in Kampinos National Park near Warsaw (central Poland). Tree stands were mostly coniferous. Ten full-night study sessions were done between the end of July and the beginning of September in the years 2007–2009. During each session, bats were netted at two sites situated in two zones designated as “edge” (100– 500 m from forest edge) and “interior” (1750–2250 m from forest edge). The study revealed twelve species, among which Eptesicus serotinus (Schreber), Nyctalus noctula (Schreber) and Barbastella barbastellus (Schreber) were by far most abundant. Total bat abundance recorded at ten pairs of netting sites differed significantly between the edge zone (ca. 2.5 times higher numbers) and the interior zone. Among individual species, a statistically important difference was shown only for Plecotus auritus (L.), which was more abundant close to the forest edge, though a similar tendency was noted in other species, mostly E. serotinus. The frequency of each species in the bat assemblage as well as species diversity of bats flying along forest roads did not differ between the two zones.
The main objective of this paper was to investigate factors that affect bird species diversity at local spatial scales including the role of habitat heterogeneity. The studies were carried out in a mosaic landscape of southern Poland, in habitat fragments, each described by variables which characterised the size of the plot and its spatial structure, including vegetation. A species diversity index was then calculated for each plot using Shannon-Wiener index, based on count of nesting birds obtained through territory mapping method. Correspondence analysis (CA) was then used to illustrate relationships between groups of plots of different scopes of species diversity and the measured characteristics of the plots. The high diversity among birds was found to be primarily connected with an increase in the proportion of old forest, whereas the diversity decreased with an increase in the proportion of ‘farmland’ (including meadows and pastures). Other significant effects on the changes in species diversity were exerted by the degree of density in the herb layer and the tree canopy layer, as well as by the presence of wetlands. The localscale inertia in the heterogeneous-type habitats results primarily from the differences in quality and structure of the plot, which reflect their position between the ‘forest’ – ‘non-forest’ gradient. In the studied range of sizes (0.2–40 ha), the size of a given plot is of lesser significance than that of the vegetation structure. All the variables which represent potential effects upon the local-scale diversity of birds, and the suitability of CA are discussed against the background of the results of this study and available literature data.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.