Ograniczanie wyników

Czasopisma help
Autorzy help
Lata help
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 16

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  ampicillin
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has two mechanisms of resistance to P-lactam antibiotics; one is mediated by mecA gene expression, and the other by penicillinase production. It has been generally accepted in the clinical field that β-lactam antibiotics are not the drugs of choice for MRSA infection. In this report, however, ampicillin and penicillin G were shown to have relatively good activity against MRSA if combined with a β-lactamase inhibitor, sulbactam. These β-lactam antibiotics were found to have relatively high binding affinities to PBP2', the mecA-encoded MRSA-specific penicillin-binding protein. The possible therapeutic application of sulbactam/ampicillin against MRSA infection in combination with arbekacin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic newly developed and introduced into clinical use in Japan, is discussed.
Due to the fastidious nature of B. henselae and the limited number of available isolates worldwide, there are few data on its in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics. We determined the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ten antimicrobial agents against 11 feline isolates of B. henselae by Etest method. The lowest MICs were obtained for rifampicin = 0.002 mg/L. MICs of all isolates were < 0.016 mg/L for ampicilin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, tetracycline and ranged from 0.016 to 0.032 mg/L for azithromycin. The MICs for two tested fluoroquinolones: ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin ranged from 0.016 to 0.125 mg/L. The highest MICs were obtained for gentamicin ranging from 0.025 to 2.0 mg/L. Sulphonamide resistance genes sul 1, sul 2, sul 3 were not found in any of the tested isolates. Etest methodology seems to be a reliable method for determination of B. henselae susceptibility, however standardization is strongly desired.
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria was observed in various aquatic environments including seas, rivers, lakes, coastal areas, surface water and sediments. The increased implementation of antibiotics into these environments through medical therapy, agriculture and animal husbandry has resulted in new selective pressures on natural bacterial aquatic populations. Antibiotic resistance of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the surface microlayer and subsurface water of freshwater coastal polymictic and low-productive lake was studied. Antibiotic resistance was determined by the single disc diffusion method. The resistance level of bacteria to various antibiotics differed considerably. Bacteria were most resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin and penicillin. Majority of bacterial strains showed resistance to 4–6 out of 18 antibiotics tested. As a rule, neustonic bacteria (antibiotic resistance index, ARI 0.44) were more resistant to the studied antibiotics than planktonic bacteria (ARI 0.32). 70–90% of neustonic bacteria were resistant to ampicillin, clindamycin and erythromycin, 60– 70% of planktonic bacteria were resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and penicillin. Differences between pigmented and non-pigmented bacteria in their resistance to the tested antibiotics were observed. Above 40% of achromogenic bacterial strains were resistant to ampicillin, clindamycin and penicillin. Among bacterial strains characterised by their ability to synthesize carotenoids, more than 30% was resistant to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Bacterial resistance level to antibiotics depended on their chemical structure. Bacteria isolated from study lake were most resistant to quinolones and lincosamides while they were most susceptible to tetracyclines and aminoglycosides. Results presented in this paper indicate that antibiotics are a significant selection factor and probably play an important role in regulating the composition of bacterial communities in aquatic ecosystems. Adaptive responses of bacterial communities to several antibiotics observed in the present study may have possible implications for the public health.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for their anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic effects, however their use is associated with the broad spectrum of side effects observed in human as well as the experimental animals. Despite damaging activity of NSAIDs in upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, these drugs exert deleterious influence in lower GI tract, including colon. The role of GI microflora in the pathogenesis of NSAIDs-induced experimental colonic damage is not completely understood. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the relative importance of the GI microflora on the experimental colonic damage in the presence of caused by NSAID, and 2) to assess the efficacy of antibiotic treatment with ampicillin on the process of healing of colitis. We compared the effect of vehicle, ASA applied 40 mg/kg intragastrically (i.g.) or the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, celecoxib (25 mg/kg i.g.) without or with ampicillin treatment (800 mg/kg i.g.) administered throughout the period of 10 days, on the intensity of TNBS-induced colitis in rats. The severity of colonic damage, the alterations in the colonic blood flow (CBF) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, the mucosal expression of TNF-, IL-1ß, COX-2, VEGF and iNOS and the plasma concentration of TNF- and IL-1ß were assessed. In all rats, the faeces samples as well as those from the colonic mucosa, blood, liver and spleen underwent microbiological evaluation for intestinal bacterial species including Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. The administration of TNBS resulted in macroscopic and microscopic lesions accompanied by the significant fall in the CBF, an increase in tissue weight and 4-5-fold rise in the MPO activity and a significant increase in the plasma IL-1ß and TNF- levels. ASA or celecoxib significantly increased the area of colonic lesions, enhanced MPO activity and caused the marked increase in colonic tissue weight and plasma IL-1ß and TNF- levels, as well as an overexpression of mRNA for IL-1ß and TNF-, COX-2, VEGF and iNOS in the colonic tissue. ASA and coxib also resulted also in a significant increase of E. coli counts in the stool at day 3 and day 10 day of the observation compared with the intact rats. Moreover, E. coli translocation from the colon to the blood and extraintestinal organs such as liver and spleen in the group of rats treated without or with ASA and coxib. E. coli was the most common bacteria isolated from these organs. Treatment with ampicillin significantly attenuated the ASA- or celecoxib-induced increase in plasma levels of IL-1ß and TNF- and suppressed the mucosal mRNA expression for IL-1ß and TNF-ß, COX-2, iNOS and VEGF in the colonic mucosa. Ampicillin administration caused a significant fall in the number of E. coli in the faeces at day 3 and day 10 of observation in ASA- and coxib-treated rats with colitis. Antibiotic therapy markedly reduced bacterial translocation to the colonic tissue and the extraintestinal organs such as the liver and spleen. We conclude that administration of ASA and to lesser extent of celecoxib, delays the healing of experimental colitis and enhances the alterations in colonic blood flow, proinflammatory markers such as IL-1ß, TNF-, COX-2, iNOS and VEGF and increased intestinal mucosal permeability resulting in the intestinal bacterial translocation to the blood, spleen and liver. Antibiotic treatment with ampicillin is effective in the diminishing of the severity of colonic damage, counteracts both the NSAID-induced fall in colonic microcirculation and bacterial E.coli translocation to the extraintestinal organs.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.