Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  Ovaprim
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
The aim of the study was to determine the basic quality parameters and selected biochemical markers of asp, Aspius aspius (L.), semen after spermiation was stimulated with Ovaprim and Ovopel. Sperm motility and concentration, osmotic pressure, total protein content, and activities of acid phosphatase (AcP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and b-N-acetylglucosaminidase (b-NAG) were determined. It was revealed that higher sperm motility and concentration and higher seminal plasma protein content were obtained after stimulation with Ovaprim. The osmotic pressure of the seminal plasma estimated for males following the administration of Ovopel was higher than after they had been treated with Ovaprim. It was determined that enzyme activity in the seminal plasma of the fish stimulated with Ovaprim was higher in comparison with results obtained after they had been treated with Ovopel. Significant, positive dependencies were confirmed between the concentration of sperm and the total protein content in the seminal plasma (r2 = 0.492) and the activity of b-NAG (r2 = 0.779); among the total protein content in the seminal plasma and the activities of AcP (r2 = 0.476), LDH (r2 = 0.564), and b-NAG (r2 = 0.738); and between the activities of AcP and LDH (r2 = 0.483) and between the activities of LDH and b-NAG (r2 = 0.844).
Artificial reproduction of asp under controlled conditions was done using two different spawning agents based on GnRH analogues and dopamine antagonists (Ovopel and Ovaprim). Fish in the Ovopel and Ovaprim and combined treatment groups were treated with a dose equivalent to 1.2 pellets (0.2 and 1.0), 0.5 cm³ liquid (0.1 and 0.4) and 0.2 pellets and 0.4 cm³ liquid per kg of body weight respectively. The highest percentage of ovulation (100%) and embryo-survival to the eyed-egg-stage (81.3%) was recorded after the application of a combination of Ovopel and Ovaprim in comparison with other groups. Fish from the control group did not ovulate. The latency time was shorter in the groups where Ovopel and Ovopel with Ovaprim was applied (40) than in Ovaprim group (42–44 hrs). The obtained results indicates that combination of Ovopel with Ovaprim might be successfully used for artificial reproduction of asp.
Milt was collected from the tench Tinca tinca (L.) following hormonal stimulation with carp pituitary homogenate (CPH, group I, n = 9), Ovopel (group II, n = 8) and Ovaprim (group III, n = 9). Males non-stimulated fish were used as a control (group IV, n = 6). The parameters determined included the total volume of milt (TVM, ml) and the volume per kg of the males’ body weight (VOM, ml kg⁻¹ b.w.), total number of spermatozoa produced by the males (TSP, ×10⁹) and the number of spermatozoa per kg of their body weight (TNS, ×10⁹ kg⁻¹ b.w.). Moreover, attempts were made to show the effect of the hormone preparations on spermatozoa motility (%), their concentration in milt (×10⁹ ml⁻¹) and the total protein content in seminal plasma (mg ml⁻¹). Osmotic pressure of the seminal plasma (mOsm kg⁻¹) was determined to check if the milt samples were contaminated with urine. Pearson’s linear correlation was also determined between the osmolality, on the one hand, and the spermatozoa motility and concentration of spermatozoa in milt of the groups examined in the study, on the other. The significance of differences between the analysed parameters was checked with Tukey’s test (One-way ANOVA, α = 0.05). Motility and concentration of spermatozoa in the remained relatively low, not exceeding 22% and 5.0 · 10⁹ ml⁻¹ in each of the groups. Using CPH, Ovopel or Ovaprim did not result in any significant increase (P > 0.05) in the amount of milt obtained (TVM, VOM) or the total amount of spermatozoa produced as compared to the control group. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found only between the TNS values for group I (CPH), and group IV (control). Osmolality of the seminal plasma did not exceed 120 mOsm kg⁻¹ in any of the groups under examination. Its low values as well as low motility and low concentration of spermatozoa in milt indicate that milt was contaminated with urine, which is also corroborated by a significant correlation between osmolality and motility of spermatozoa in group III (R² = 0.828; P < 0.001) and IV (R² = 0.983; P < 0.001) and between osmolality and concentration of spermatozoa in each of the groups (R² = 0.447; P < 0.05, group I; R² = 0.964; P < 0.001, group II; R² = 0.768; P < 0.001, group III and R² = 0.924; P < 0.001; group IV).
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.