Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 5

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  Luzulo pilosae-Fagetum association
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
This work presents characteristics of plant communities identified as forest habitats of European Ecological Natura 2000 Network in Oleśnica Śląska Forest Inspectorate. A fieldwork was carried out on the total area of 4 262.67 ha, which was pointed out as probable Natura 2000 forest habitats on the basis of the species composition of stands and forest habitat type. Data was collected in accordance with the Braun-Blanquet method in selected forest subsections. 121 relevés were used in the analysis. The fieldwork confirmed Natura 2000 habitats on the area of 1 761.4 ha. Finally, they represent 6.7% of the forest inspectorate area. The habitats in a good condition were found on the area of 293.7 ha (16.7%) and the degenerated habitats on the area of 1 467.7 ha (83.3%). 6 forest habitats represented by 7 forest associations were identified: Vaccinio uliginosi-Pinetum (91D0-2), Molinio caeruleae-Quercetum roboris (9190), Calamagrostio arundinaceae- Quercetum petraeae (9190), Fraxino-Alnetum (91E0-3), Ficario-Ulmetum minoris (91F0), Galio sylvatici-Carpinetum betuli (9170-1), Luzulo pilosae-Fagetum (9110-1). The area of elm-ash forests was the largest and the area of Scotch pine bog forest was the smallest. Among the other habitats the area of beech forests was also significant.
The structure of carabid assemblages was studied in the Holy Cross Mountains, in stands of Luzulo pilosae-Fagetum lowland acidic beech forest (LAB), Dentario glandulosae-Fagetum fertile Carpathian beech forest (FCB), and Dentario enneaphylli-Fagetum fertile Sudeten beech forest (FSB) in 2002. Carabid beetles were collected using Barber's pitfall traps with ethylene glycol in monthly cycles from May to September. A total of 4260 individuals representing 28 species were caught. The highest similarity was calculated for the LAB and FCB assemblages (P=0.54), while the FCB and FSB assemblages were the least similar (P=0.39). The highest diversity was recorded in the FSB assemblage (H'=2.06), and the lowest in the assemblage of acidic lowland beech stands (LAB) (H'=1.45). The dominant species were Carabus violaceus in the LAB sites, Carabus glabratus in the FCB sites, and Carabus hortensis in the FSB sites. The most uniform distribution of individuals between species was seen in the FSB assemblage (0.76) and in the FCB assemblage (0.74), while the LAB assemblage was highly non-uniform in this respect (0.53) Trapability was lowest in LAB (0.36) and highest is FSB (0.55). The prevailing zoogeographical elements were Palaearctic species in LAB, European Forest Province montane species in FCB, and European Forest Province species in FSB. The LAB and FCB assemblages were most active in the spring (Fig. 4) and the FSB assemblage reached peak activity in the summer (July). The dominant species types were forest species (habitat preferences), large zoophages (feeding preferences), mesohygrophiles (humidity preferences), and spring breeders (developmental type).
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.