The yielding of pea (Pisum sativum L.) under different tillage conditions

• Autorzy: Wozniak A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Plonowanie grochu siewnego (Pisum sativum L.) w różnych warunkach uprawy roli

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, however, a lower crop yield is achieved in the no-tillage system than in the ploughing system. The reported study evaluated the yielding of pea under conventional (ploughing) tillage (shallow ploughing and harrowing after harvest of the previous crop, ploughing in the autumn), reduced tillage (only cultivator after harvest of the previous crop) and herbicide tillage (only Roundup 360 SL after harvest of the previous crop). The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one – by 40.8% – in the herbicide tillage. The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m² , the number of grains per 1 m² , and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage. The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m² , grain number per 1 m² , grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m² . Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m² and grain number per 1 m² , as well as between plant number per 1 m² and pod number per 1 m² , and between plant number per 1 m² and grain number per plant.

PL

Produkcyjność roślin zależy od wielu czynników bezpośrednio wpływających na siebie, dlatego zmienność plonu może być duża i trudna do przewidzenia. Najczęściej jednak rośliny w uprawach bezpłużnych dają mniejsze plony niż w uprawach płużnych. W prowadzonych badaniach oceniano plonowanie grochu siewnego w warunkach uprawy tradycyjnej (podorywka po zbiorze przedplonu, jesienią orka przedzimowa), uproszczonej (kultywator po zbiorze przedplonu) i herbicydowej (Roundup 360 SL po zbiorze przedplonu). Największe plony grochu siewnego uzyskano w uprawie tradycyjnej, natomiast mniejsze o 40,8% w uprawie herbicydowej. Tradycyjna uprawa roli zwiększała liczbę strąków na 1 m² , liczbę nasion na 1 m² oraz masę nasion z rośliny, w stosunku do uprawy herbicydowej. Plon nasion grochu skorelowany był z liczbą strąków na 1 m² , liczbą nasion z 1 m² , masą nasion z rośliny oraz liczbą roślin na 1 m² . Korelacje wystąpiły również między liczbą strąków na 1 m² a liczbą nasion z 1 m² , a także między liczbą roślin na 1 m² a liczbą strąków na 1 m² oraz między liczbą roślin na 1 m² a masą nasion z rośliny.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 12
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.133-141,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wozniak A.

• Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Aura E., 1999. Effects of shallow tillage on physical properties of clay soil and growth of spring cereals in dry moist summer in southern Finland. Soil Till. Res. 50, 169–176.
• Borowy A., 2012. Growth and yield of stake tomato under no-tillage cultivation using hairy vetch as a living mulch. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 11 (2), 229–252.
• Davis A.S., Renner K.A., Gross K.L., 2005. Weed seedbank and community shifts in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Weed Sci. 53, 296–306.
• Doré T., Meynard J.M., Sebillotte M., 1998. The role of grain number, nitrogen nutrition and stem number in limiting pea crop (Pisum sativum) yields under agricultural conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 8, 29–37.
• Gruber S., Pekrun C., Möhring J., Claupein W., 2012. Long-term yield and weed response to conservation and stubble tillage in SW Germany. Soil Till. Res. 121, 49–56.
• Guy S.O., Cox D.B., 2002. Reduced tillage increases residue groundcover in subsequent dry pea and winter wheat crops in the Palouse region of Idaho. Soil Till. Res. 66, 69–77.
• Hemmat A., Eskandari I., 2004. Tillage system effects upon productivity of a dryland winter wheat-chickpea rotation in the northwest region of Iran. Soil Till. Res. 78, 69–81.
• Huang G.B., Zhang R.Z., Li G.D., Li L.L., Chan K.Y., Heenan D.P., Chen W., Unkovich M.J., Robertson M.J., Cullis B.R., Bellotti W.D., 2008. Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat-field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems. Field Crops Res. 107, 43–55.
• Jones C.A., Basch G., Baylis A.D., Bazzoni D., Bigs J., Bradbury R.B., Chaney K., Deeks L.K., Field R., Gomez J.A., Jones R.J.A., Jordan V., Lane M.C.G., Leake A., Livermore M., Owens P.N., Ritz K., Sturny W.G., Thomas F., 2006. Conservation agriculture in Europe: an approach to sustainable crop production by protecting soil and water? SOWAP, Jealott’s Hill, Bracknell, UK.
• Jug I., Jug D., Sabo M., Stipeševic B., Stošic M., 2011. Winter wheat yield and yield components as affected by soil tillage systems. Turk. J. Agric. For. 35, 1–7.
• Kęsik T., Błażewicz-Woźniak M., Michowska A.E., 2011. Influence of mulching and nitrogen nutrition on bear garlic (Allium ursinum L.) growth. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10 (3), 221–233.
• Knight S.M., 2004. Plough, minimal till or direct drill? – Establishment method and production efficiency. In: HGCA Conference 2004: Managing Soil and Roots for Profitable Production. London, Home Grown Cereals Authority.
• López-Bellido L., Fuentes M., Castillo J.E., López-Garrido F.J., Fernández E.J., 1996. Long-term tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agron. J. 88, 783–791.
• López-Bellido L., López-Garrido F.J., Fuentes M., Castillo J.E., Fernández E.J., 1997. Influence of tillage, crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic matter and nitrogen under rainfed mediterranean conditions. Soil Till. Res. 43, 277–293.
• Małecka I., Blecharczyk A., Sawinska Z., Dobrzeniecki T., 2012. The effect of various long-term tillage systems on soil properties and spring barley yield. Turk. J. Agric. For. 36, 217–226.
• Morris N.L., Miller P.C.H., Orson J.H., Froud-Williams R.J., 2010. The adoption of noninversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment – a review. Soil Till. Res. 108, 1–15.
• Nurzyńska-Wierdak R., Dzida K., Rożek E., Jarosz Z., 2012. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on growth, yield and chemical composition of garden rocket. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 11 (2), 289–300.
• Peigné J., Ball B.C., Roger-Estrade J., David C., 2007. Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? Soil Use Manage. 23, 2, 129–144.
• Pikul Jr., J.L., Ramig, R.E., Wilkins, D.E., 1993. Soil properties and crop yield among four tillage systems in a wheat-pea rotation. Soil Till. Res. 26, 151–162.
• Tørresen K.S. Skuterud R., Weiseth L., Tandsaether H.J., Jonsen S.H, 1999. Plant protection in spring cereal production with reduced tillage. I. Grain yield and weed development. Crop Prot. 18, 595–603.
• Vita P., Paolo E., Fecondo G., Fonzo N., Pisante M. 2007. No-tillage and conventional tillage effects on durum wheat yield, grain quality, and soil moisture content in southern Italy. Soil Till. Res. 92 (1/2), 69–78.
• Woźniak A., 1996. Importance of underplant crop and farmyard as manures in monoculture of winter triticale. In: Proceedings of the 4th ESA Congress 2, 508–509.
• Woźniak A., 2012. Weed infestation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) crop under the conditions of plough and ploughless tillage. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 11 (2), 253–262.
• Woźniak A., Haliniarz M., 2012. The after-effect of long-term reduced tillage systems on the biodiversity of weeds in spring crops. Acta Agrobot. 65 (1), 141–148.