Wyniki wyszukiwania

1

Temporal and spatial differences in the emission of calls by pipistrelle bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus

100%

Downs N. C., Racey P. A.

Acta Theriologica

|

2007

|

tom 52

|

nr 1

The number of orientation, feeding and social calls emitted by pipistrelle batsPipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber, 1774 andP. pygmaeus Leach, 1825 was recorded throughout the night at eight different sites. Social calls were unaffected by weather variables, whereas orientation calls and feeding buzzes were both significantly affected by cloud and temperature conditions. The number of emissions of each call type was significantly different between sites, indicating that the bats used different sites for different activities. Significant positive correlations between all three combinations of call types occurred only during the middle of the night, corresponding with the nadir of flying insects. This suggests that bats were engaged in activities other than feeding at this time, such as territory protection or mate attraction.

2

Zimowe stanowiska karlika malutkiego Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) i karlika drobnego Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825) w północno-zachodniej Polsce

84%

Wojtaszyn G., Rutkowski T., Wiewiora D., Ciechanowski M., Stephan W., Kepel A., Dziegielewska M.

Nietoperze

|

2004

|

tom 05

|

nr 1-2

3

Nocek duży Myotis myotis i karlik drobny Pipistrellus pygmaeus - nowe gatunki nietoperzy dla Wdzydzkiego Parku Krajobrazowego

84%

Ciechanowski M., Sadowska G.

Nietoperze

|

2010

|

tom 11

|

nr 1-2

4

A rapid PCR-based test for species identification of two cryptic bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus and its application on museum and dropping samples

67%

Kanuch P., Hajkova P., Rehak Z., Bryja J.

Acta Chiropterologica

|

2007

|

tom 09

|

nr 1

The identification of two cryptic bat species of the genus Pipistrellus using a non-destructive and quick method of multiplex PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis is described. Two primer combinations were able to produce species-specific bands that identified reliably individuals that were previously identified by mtDNA sequencing. Robustness of the method was subsequently successfully tested on 16 randomly selected free-living animals from central Europe (tissue samples obtained from a 3 mm punch of wing-membrane) identified to species on the basis of echolocation calls. Nine out of 15 museum specimens and 100% of fresh faecal samples from seven individuals were also successfully identified by this method. The described method thus provides a good way to routinely distinguish two Pipistrellus species by using non-destructive sampling of living individuals or droppings, and will be used in field studies of their ecology.

5

XIX Ogolnopolska Konferencja Chiropterologiczna [Pokrzywna, 4-6 XI 2005 r.]

67%

Fuszara M.

Wiadomości Ekologiczne

|

2006

|

tom 52

|

nr 1

38-40

6

Kolonie rozrodcze nietoperzy na Pomorzu Zachodnim

67%

Ignaszak K., Dziegielewska M.

Nietoperze

|

2009

|

tom 10

|

nr 1-2

7

Variability in echolocation calls of Pipistrellus pygmaeus [Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae] during search flight in different habitats

67%

Bartonicka T., Rehak Z.

Acta Theriologica

|

2005

|

tom 50

|

nr 2

The changes in echolocation behaviour and the structure of calls ofPipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825) were studied in different habitats of a floodplain forest in south-eastern Moravia (Czech Republic) in 2001–2002. Calls (403 observations) were recorded in different sites between April and mid June (before weaning) using a time expansion bat-detector. Three signals per individual were analysed and descriptive statistics of variables of calls were presented. Association of signal types with habitat structure (cluttered, side-cluttered, semi-cluttered and uncluttered space) was found in echolocation sequences of the search phase of flight.P. pygmaeus used mainly narrowband signals (bandwidths less than 15 kHz) in uncluttered space and wideband signals (more than 15 kHz) in cluttered space. Almost 6% of the inter pulse intervals of signals were twice (or more) longer than usual inter pulse intervals (mainly in uncluttered space). In general, temporal variables of signals reached higher values in uncluttered spaces (except for inter pulse interval) than in cluttered ones. On the contrary, spectral variables of signals reached lower values in uncluttered habitats in comparison with cluttered ones. In addition, the signals were less variable in open spaces while in cluttered and partly-cluttered habitats different and higher variability was found. We also studied the accuracy of identification of pipistrelles by call parameters and possible misidentifications in relation to habitat structure. Multivariate discriminant analyses were carried out on the time and frequency parameters of calls produced by pipistrelles.

8

Przyczynek do znajomości chiropterofauny planowanego Specjalnego Obszaru Ochrony "Jezioro Bukowo"

51%

Lupicki D.

Nietoperze

|

2008

|

tom 09

|

nr 1

9

Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik

Wykorzystanie skrzynek drewnianych i trocinobetonowych przez nietoperze w Szczecinskim Parku Krajobrazowym 'Puszcza Bukowa'

51%

Ignaszak K., Dziegielewska M.

Studia i Materiały Centrum Edukacji Przyrodniczo-Leśnej

|

2009

|

tom 11

|

nr 2[21]

91-100

W lasach, w drzewostanach młodych i monokulturach, stosuje się sztuczne skrzynki dla nietoperzy wykonane z drewna lub trocinobetonu. Łącznie w 2001 i 2005 r. na terenie Szczecińskiego Parku Krajobrazowego „Puszcza Bukowa” powieszono 60 budek drewnianych i 154 budek trocinobetonowych dla nietoperzy.W wyniku kontroli w 2007 r. stwierdzono wysoki stopień (ca 90%) zasiedlenia skrzynek trocinobetonowych.W zinwentaryzowanych sztucznych kryjówkach stwierdzono obecność 5 gatunków nietoperzy.

10

Chiropterofauna Wigierskiego Parku Narodowego

43%

Kmiecik A., Kmiecik P., Grzywinski W.

Nietoperze

|

2010

|

tom 11

|

nr 1-2

11

Chiropterofauna Kampinoskiego Parku Narodowego

43%

Olszewski A.

Parki Narodowe

|

2008

|

nr 4

12

Karlik drobny

42%

Olszewski A.

Echa Leśne

|

2006

|

nr 10

Ograniczanie wyników

Temporal and spatial differences in the emission of calls by pipistrelle bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus

Zimowe stanowiska karlika malutkiego Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) i karlika drobnego Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825) w północno-zachodniej Polsce

Nocek duży Myotis myotis i karlik drobny Pipistrellus pygmaeus - nowe gatunki nietoperzy dla Wdzydzkiego Parku Krajobrazowego

A rapid PCR-based test for species identification of two cryptic bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus and its application on museum and dropping samples

XIX Ogolnopolska Konferencja Chiropterologiczna [Pokrzywna, 4-6 XI 2005 r.]

Kolonie rozrodcze nietoperzy na Pomorzu Zachodnim

Variability in echolocation calls of Pipistrellus pygmaeus [Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae] during search flight in different habitats

Przyczynek do znajomości chiropterofauny planowanego Specjalnego Obszaru Ochrony "Jezioro Bukowo"

Wykorzystanie skrzynek drewnianych i trocinobetonowych przez nietoperze w Szczecinskim Parku Krajobrazowym 'Puszcza Bukowa'

Chiropterofauna Wigierskiego Parku Narodowego

Chiropterofauna Kampinoskiego Parku Narodowego

Karlik drobny