Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 6

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Biologically relevant synchronous discharges of assemblies of pyramidal neurons result from coordinated activity of oscillating neuronal networks. Cortical oscillating networks include different types of GABAergic interneuron, which are known to innervate different subdomains of pyramidal neurons. Interneurons contribute to different cortical rhythms by firing at different phases of field oscillations. The cortical network oscillators are embedded in larger oscillating networks comprising subcortical structures, such as the basal forebrain. An example of this kind of cortico-subcortical network is the hippocampus reciprocally connected with the medial septum belonging to the basal forebrain corticopetal system. The medial septum innervates the hippocampus through cholinergic, GABA-ergic and glutamatergic projections and receives a prominent GABA-ergic innervation from the hippocampus. Additionally, the GABA-ergic septo-hippocampal cells specifically target the GABA-ergic interneurons, implying a role in hippocampal rhythmogenesis. Extracellular recording and juxtacellular labelling of hippocampo-septal GABA-ergic neurons and septo-hippocampal neurons in vivo have provided insight into their functional properties, including firing patterns of identified neurons during different, brain state-dependent hippocampal oscillations.
Sherman and Guillery (2002) proposed that thalamic sensory nuclei might function as first- or higher-order relays. According to their hypothesis, first order relays (such as rat’s ventral postero-medial nucleus, VPM) transmit sensory information from the periphery to the cortex, while the function of higherorder relays (such as rat’s medial posterior nucleus, PoM) is to transmit information between cortical areas via cortico-thalamo-cortical connections. In our experiments on awake Wistar rats we recorded extracellular field potentials from VPM, PoM and barrel cortex, while mechanically stimulating the rats’ vibrissae and manipulating their level of arousal by additional aversive stimuli, i.e. loud sounds, or electric shocks applied on the skin of the ear. We assessed functional connection strengths between the three structures during stimuli processing using cross-trial correlation (Sobolewski et al. 2010). Our results from quiescent rats corroborate Sherman and Guillery’s proposition. At low arousal level (no aversive stimuli) the sensory signal was primarily relayed from VPM to the barrel cortex and from there to PoM. However at high arousal level this network scheme was short-circuited and the barrel cortex also received input directly from PoM. We show that sensory pathways,form a dynamic system, which is capable of reconfiguring the sensory signal’s route to cortical areas in step with the animal’s behavioral context. This research was supported by the Polish National Science Centre grant N N401 533040.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.