Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
Investigating regional differences on a domestic and international scale is a current scientific issue. EU integration after enlargement in 2004 has provided a more complex picture. In the present study, the assessment of regional differences is based on the much criticized but most widely accepted measure – GDP per capita of the NUTS 2 regions of EU member states standardized by purchasing power parity. The study is based on three major issues, providing the following hypotheses: (H1) not all of the capital regions are the most progressive amongst member states; (H2) the Eastern European countries’ capital region is not included in the first 20% of the development list; (H3) the farther we are from the centre of the EU, the higher the territorial discrepancies within the regions of each member state. Due to the complexity of EU territory, only some hypotheses have been possible to understand and justify.
2
100%
The examination of disadvantaged regions goes back to a long history, which is greatly influenced by the ever-changing natural, economic and human resources. Consequently, while examining the disadvantaged areas, we face new systems of coherences. Today’s regional policy also needs to answer the question whether the spatial development funds of the past have been efficient or not and whether the land use distribution influences the spatial competitiveness or not. These issues occur every day while analyzing the efficiency of the past 20 years’ regional policy
The actuality of our topie is established and justified by the fact that the cohesion policy of the European Union is criticized very much nowadays. In our opinion, the criticism primarily focuses on the low efficiency of the use of EU funds and the increasing gap between the regions. It was mentioned even at the 2010 Open Days events in Brussels that the distribution system of funds in the Union is not perfect, but the current principles, system and the eligibility criteria have to be maintained. The strengthening of the Community and its cohesion policy is one of the priority tasks for the Hungarian EU presidency as they will get more importance due to the future enlargements.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.