Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 13

Liczba wyników na stronie
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników

Wyniki wyszukiwania

help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
3
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Stanisław Lencewicz

100%
Stanisław Lencewicz was born on 19 April 1889, in Warsaw. After finishing a secondary school he worked as a teacher. In 1913- 1916 he studied in Neuchâtel under the guidance of professor E. Argand obtaining the title of a doctor in exact sciences. His habilitation took place in 1919 in Lviv under the tutorship of professor E. Romer. In 1922 he obtained the associated professorship and in 1931 the full professorship at the University of Warsaw. In 1916-1919 he lectured the geographic subjects at the Free Polish Public University, at the Technical University, at the Military School of Topographers, and at the National Institute of Pedagogy. In 1918 he brought into existence the Department of Geography at the University of Warsaw and he ran this department from 1920 to the outbreak of the II World War. He promoted 8 doctors and two of them obtained habilitation. Professor Lencewicz conducted research in the Małopolska Upland, in the Alps, in the Tatras, and later mainly in the Central Poland and in Polesie. Until 1939 he published 195 papers on geomorphology, hydrography, cartography, regional geography, human geography, and others, including two highly appreciated textbooks on the regional geography of Poland. He actively participated in the international scientific life. Professor presented papers at over a dozen international geographic conventions and conferences (among others in Cairo, Cambridge, Paris, and Amsterdam) and a few of them he co-organized himself. Profesor Lencewicz took part in all activities related to the Polish interwar geography. He co-founded the Polish Geographic Society, he was a member of its board and the President of its Warsaw office. He edited „Przegląd Geograficzny” and took part in the organization of the Military Institute of Geography where he later worked. He was a member of the Warsaw Scientific Society and of the Geographic Commission at the Polish Academy of Learning, a honorary member of the Czechoslovakian Scientific Society, and a correspondent member of the Geographic Societies in Mexico and in Belgrade. He contributed to the International Geographic Bibliography. He was honoured with many Polish and foreign decorations for his achievements: among others with the Officer's Cross Polonia Restituta, with the Cross of Independence with Swords, with the badge of honour of the Military School of Topographers. He spent the occupation in Warsaw in difficult conditions, earning a living as a clerk in the Municipal Waterworks office. He participated in the conspiratorial scientific and didactic life of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science at the University of Warsaw. In 1943-1944 he lectured at the underground courses. He worked upon the new textbooks of general physical geography and of the geography of Europe (partially published after the war). He was murdered by the Nazis in the action of dislodging civilians during the Warsaw Uprising, September 1, 1944.
The existing methods of landscape categorization are not sufficient to grasp relationships in the areas with a complicated evolutionary cycle. Therefore the geochemical landscape classification requires further improvement. The aim of the article is to show the application of the research methods of landscape geochemistry to determine the recent geochemical relationship in the Taunus Mts, Taunus Mts Foreland and on the Plain of the Lower Main River. The elementary landscape and geochemical landscape of various taxonomical levels can be distinguished in the studied area. Interrelated subordination of the geochemical landscape is conected with the Permian, Tertiary and Quartenary tectonic structures. Relations between elementary landscape should be regarded as the result of the periglacial denudative processes and the Holocene soil erosion. The recent geochemical interlinkings are not clearly visible in the investigated area.
11
Artykuł dostępny w postaci pełnego tekstu - kliknij by otworzyć plik
Content available

Typologia krajobrazu naturalnego okolic Pińczowa

51%
The study proves that the structure and functioning of landscape in the researched area resembles in many respects polygenetic highland and medium-mountain areas of Western Europe, whose contemporary diversity is determined by the following factors: (underground) geological structure, genetic type of Quaternary deposits, and - in some cases - erosion (Ostaszewska, 1987). It should also be emphasised that, similarly to other, "old" lithogenic landscapes, interpretation of geological features of the Pińczów Hummock stili remains a challenge, while some phenomena (particularly those related to the role of periglacial processes in the formation of contemporary landforms) even today defy satisfactory explanation. The outlined process of interdependence between the components and spatial constituents of the landscape in the Pińczów region is solely based on the findings of field research. In the future, it should be supplemented by a more thorough lithological examination and information on the contemporary (if any) activity of tectonic structures (the town chronicles indicate that the last recorded earthquake took place in the 18th century). The only method allowing to properly characterise this highly complicated landscape seems to consist in preparing a more detailed field documentation (especially making the drilling network more dense). Although rather painstaking, this traditional method of geographic research prevents the researchers from falling into the trap of "easy generalisations", of which geoecologists studying the landscapes of old mountains and highlands are frequently accused, and quite rightly so (Cf. Semmel, 1996).
The differences between forest and agricultural loess landscapes are presented in this paper. Structure and functioning of the landscape-system were taken into account. The conclusions have been based on the results of landscape research conducted in the Nida Basin. All components of the landscape were examined, with the special focus on soils which were treated as the indicator of the landscape condition. Differences found in structure and functioning of forest and agricultural landscape open the question of making changes in the methodology of the loess landscape classification.
Pierwsza strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wstecz Poprzednia strona wyników Strona / 1 Następna strona wyników Pięć stron wyników wprzód Ostatnia strona wyników
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.