PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2010 | 58 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Ecological land classification and mapping based on vegetation-environment hierarchical analysis - a case study of Buldan forest district (Turkey)

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Distinction of the geographic areas intended for hierarchical sequence of vegetation classes involves the hierarchical classification of ecosystems. In this context, it is essential to determine the effective environmental characteristics at each hierarchical level of vegetation distinction. The study was carried out in order to classify and hierarchical mapping the Buldan forest district (area 190,000 km², altitude 400–1400 m a.s.l. covered in 40% with Mediterranean pine and oak forest, in 60% – by arable and pasture land). 56 sample plots (20 m × 20 m) were taken. At each sample plot, environmental characteristics (56 variables) and vascular plant species (108 species in total) were recorded. The relationships between environmental variables and the distribution of plants (presence/absence) were investigated by two hierarchical approaches for both of floristic data matrix and environment matrix by using cluster analysis, stepwise discriminate analysis and chi square test. Interspecific correlation analysis was also applied to determine the indicator species at each level of divisions. Two subdistricts were distinguised: Ortakcı-Cagir subdistrict (characteristic species association with Pinus brutia, Pistacia terebinthus, Nerium oleander, Ficus carica, Olea europea) and Suleymanli subdistrict (species association with Pinus nigra, Cistus laurifolius, Prunus divarcata and Rosa canina). Two sections in Suleymanli subdistrict were distinguished: Kocaalan section with characteristic association of Pinus nigra, Cistus laurifolius, Drypteris pallida and Ericek section – characterized with an association of Creategus monogina, Astragalus sp. and Pistacia terebintus. The altitude was the fundamental variable affecting on site classification at the level of subdistrict. Longitude was the most important variable affecting on discrimination of the sections of Suleymanli subdistrict. This local study offers a model including statistical processes which can be applied to the other forest areas for large scale classification of vegetation and environmental relations. Application of this model based on hierarchical classification of ecosystem units is also important for estimation of the changes of natural vegetation in ecosystems in the future due to global climatic change.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

58

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.55-67,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Soil Ecology, Suleyman Demirel University, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
autor

Bibliografia

  • Allison L.E., Moodie C.D. 1965 – Volumetric Calsimeter (In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed C.A. Black) – American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Publisher Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1389–1392.
  • Altun L., Baskent Z.E., Yilmaz M., Kalay Z., Turna I. 2002 – K.T.U. Orman Fakultesi Arastirma Ormaninda Yetisme Ortami Birimlerinin Cografi Bilgi Sistemleri Yolu ile Haritalanmasi [Mapping with GIS of site units in the experimental forest of KTU Forest Faculty] – Istanbul University, J. Fac. Forest. 52: 51–72 (in Turkish).
  • Atalay I. 1987 – The ecological conditions of the natural occurrence areas of cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) and regioning of seed transfer of cedar in Turkey – Forest Ministry Press, Ankara, Turkey, 663/61, 167 pp.
  • Atalay I. 1994 – Türkiye Vejetasyon Coğrafyası [Vegetation Geography of Turkey] – Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi [Ege University Bookshop], Bornova İzmir of Turkey, 300 pp. (in Turkish).
  • Bailey G.R. 1984 – Testing an ecosystem regionalization – J. Environ. Manage. 19: 239–248.
  • Banner A., Meidinger D.V. 1996 – Ecosystem mapping methods for British Columbia – Environ. Monit. Assess. 39: 97–117.
  • Bouyoucos C.J. 1962 – Hydrometer method for making particle size analysis of soil – J. Argon. 54: 218–223.
  • Cheng C.C. 2001 – Development of an ecosystem classification system for the Liukiei experimental forest, Taiwan – J. For. Sci. 16: 53–64.
  • Cole L.C. 1949 – The measurement of interspesific association – J. Ecol. 30: 411–424.
  • Dasdemir I. 1992 – Turkiye’deki Dogu ladini (Picea orientalis Carr.) Ormanlarinda Yetisme Ortami Faktorleri-Verimlilik Iliskisi [Relationship between the site factors and the site quality in the Eastern picea (Picea orientalis L. Carr. forests of Turkey] – Forestry Research Institute Publications, Press no: 64, Istanbul (in Turkish).
  • DMI 2003 – Denizli/Buldan bolgesine ait 1980 ve 1995 yillari itibariyle meteroloji verileri, Turkiye [Meteorological datum between 1980 and 1995 to Denizli/Buldan Region Turkey] (in Turkish).
  • Dombois D.M. 1965 – Eco-Geographic criteria for mapping forest habitats in the Southeastern Manitoba – Forest. Chron. 41: 188–206.
  • FAO, IRIC, ISSS 1998 – World reference base for soil resources – Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Fontaine M., Aerts R., Ozkan K., Mert A., Gulsoy S., Suel H., Waelkens M., Muys B. 2007 – Elevation and exposition rather than soil types determine communities and site suitability in Mediterranean mountain forests of southern Anatolia, Turkey – Forest Ecol. Manag. 247: 18–25.
  • Hahs A., Enright N.J., Thomas I. 1999 – Plant communities, species richness and their environment correlates in the sandy heats of Little Desert National Park, Victoria – Aust. J. Ecol. 24: 249–257.
  • Jackson M.L. 1958 – Soil chemical analysis – Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  • Jeffrey W.W. 1964 – Forest types along lower Liard River, Northwest Territories – Department of Forestry publication no: 1035, Roger Duhamel F.R.S.C. Queen’s Printer and Contoller of Stationery, Ottowa, Cat. No. 47–1035, 103 pp.
  • Jeglum J.K., Arnup R., Jones R.K., Pierpoint G., Wickware G.M. 1983 – Forest ecosystem classification in Ontorio’s clay belt: a case study – Proc. Artificial Regeneration of Conifers in the Upper Great Lakes Region, Oct. 26–28, 1982) – Green Bay, Wis. Mich. Tech. Univ. pp. 111–128.
  • Kantarci M.D. 1978 – Orman Ekosistemi, Orman Yetişme Ortamı, Bunun Sınıflandırılması ve Haritalanması Esasları [Forest ecosystem, forest site and principals of the forest site classification and mapping] – Istanbul University, J. Fac. Forest. 28: 117–141 (in Turkish).
  • Kantarci M.D. 1991 – Akdeniz Bolgesi’nin Yetisme Ortami Bolgesel Siniflandirilmasi [The site classification of Mediterranean region, Turkey] – Forest Ministry Press, 668/64 Ankara, Turkey, 150 pp. (in Turkish).
  • Kantarci M.D. 2000 – Soil Science – Istanbul University, Press No: 4265, Department of Forestry publication no: 462, Istanbul, 420 pp. (in Turkish).
  • Klute A. 1986 – Water retention laboratory methods (In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Ed. A. Klute) – Agron. No 9, Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Ozdamar K. 1999 – Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi-II [Statistical data analysis using packet programs-II] – Anadolu University Press, Publishing No2, Eskisehir, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Özkan K. 2004 – Beysehir golu havzasi’nda Anadolu karaçaminin (Pinus nigra Arnold) yayılisi ile fizyografik yetisme ortami faktorleri arasindaki iliksiler [Relationships between physiographic site factors and distribution of Crimean pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) in Beysehir watershed] – Suleyman Demirel University, J. Fac. Forest. 2: 30–47 (in Turkish).
  • Özkan K., Senol H., Basayigit L., Gulsoy S., Mert A. 2006 – Buldan bati daglik bolgesinde sacli mesenin (Quercus cerris L. var. cerris) yayilisini sinirlandiran faktorler [Restricting factors of distribution of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L. var. cerris) in Buldan mountainous area] – Buldan sempozyumu [Symposium on Buldan district], Ankara, pp. 589–594 (in Turkish).
  • Özkan K. 2006 – Beysehir golu havzasi cariksaraylar yetisme ortami yoreler grubunda fizyografik yetisme ortami faktorleri ile agac ve cali tur cesitliligi arasindaki iliskiler [Relationships between tree and shrub species diversity and physiographic site factors in Cariksaraylar site section groups in Beysehir watershed] – Anadolu University, J. Sci. Tech. 7: 157–166 (in Turkish).
  • Özkan K., Tetik M., Yeşilkaya Y. 1998 – Antalya yoresi Kizilcam (Pinus brutia Ten.) agaclandirmalari yapilacak sig topraklar icin gelistirilen ayirim fonksiyonu [The discriminate function developed to the shallow soils afforestated with Red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) in Antalya region] – Suleyman Demirel University, J. Sci Inst. 3: 105–110 (in Turkish).
  • Özkan K., Kantarcı M.D. 2008 – Beysehir golu havzasi’nin orman yetisme ortami alt bolgeleri ve yoreleri gruplari. [Subregıons and sıte sectıon groups on beysehir watershed] – Suleyman Demirel University, J. Fac. Forest. 2: 123–135 (in Turkish).
  • Smalley G.W. 1980 – Classification and evaluation of forest sites on the Western Highland Rim and Pennyroyal – U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report SO-30, South For. Exp. Stn., New Orleans, La., 120 pp.
  • Senol H. 2006 – Buldan (Denizli) yoresinin petrolojisi-jeokimyasi ve Buldan (Denizli) granitinin haritalanmasinda aster uydu verisinin kullanimi [The using of Aster satellite datum on the mapping of Buldan granite, petrology and geochemistry of Buldan (Denizli) region] – Master Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science, Department of Geology, Konya, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Velázquez A. 1992 – Landscape ecology-vegetation map of Tláloc ans Pelado volcanoes, Mexico – ITC J. 3: 213–226.
  • Walkey H., Black I.A. 1934 – An examination of the method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid method – J. Soil Sci. 37: 29–38.
  • Wright R.G., Murray M.P., Merrill T. 1998 – Ecoregions as a level of ecological analysis – Biol. Conservat. 86: 207–213.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-9ced5d9e-43f5-4356-8b17-8c258d77cb77
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.