Regulation of sporulation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

• Autorzy: Piekarska I. , Rytka J. , Rempola B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sporulation of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae - equivalent to gametogenesis in higher organisms, is a complex differentiation program induced by starvation of cells for nitrogen and carbon. Such environmental conditions activate coordinated, sequential changes in gene expression leading to production of haploid, stress-resistant spores. Sporulation comprises two rounds of meiosis coupled with spore morphogenesis and is tightly controlled to ensure viable progeny. This review concerns the regulation of differentiation process by nutritional and transcriptional signals.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sporulation; yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; meiosis; gene expression; signalling pathway

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biochimica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 57
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.242-250,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Piekarska I.

• Department of Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Rytka J.

autor

Rempola B.

Bibliografia

• Anderson SF, Steber CM, Esposito RE, Coleman JE (1995) UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1 DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci 4: 1832-1843. 
• Benjamin KR, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Herskowitz I (2003) Control of landmark events in meiosis by the CDK Cdc28 and the meiosis-specific kinase Ime2. Genes Dev 17: 1524-1539. 
• Blumental-Perry A, Li W, Simchen G, Mitchell AP (2002) Repression and activation domains of Rme1p structurally overlap, but differ in genetic requirements. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1709-1721. 
• Bolte M, Steigemann P, Braus GH, Irniger S (2002) Inhibition of APC-mediated proteolysis by the meiosis-specific protein kinase Ime2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 4385-4390 
• Bowdish KS, Yuan HE, Mitchell AP (1995) Positive control of yeast meiotic genes by the negative regulator UME6. Mol Cell Biol 15: 2955-2961. 
• Burgess SM, Ajimura M, Kleckner N (1999) GCN5-dependent histone H3 acetylation and RPD3-dependent histone H4 deacetylation have distinct, opposing effects on IME2 transcription, during meiosis and during vegetative growth, in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 6835-6840. 
• Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown PO, Herskowitz I (1998) The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282: 699-705. 
• Chu S, Herskowitz I (1998) Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. Mol Cell 1: 685-696. 
• Clancy MJ, Shambaugh ME, Timpte CS, Bokar JA (2002) Induction of sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to the formation of N6-methyladenosine in mRNA: a potential mechanism for the activity of the IME4 gene. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4509-4518. 
• Colomina N, Garí E, Gallego C, Herrero E, Aldea M (1999) G1 cyclins block the Ime1 pathway to make mitosis and meiosis incompatible in budding yeast. EMBO J 18: 320-329. 
• Cooper KF, Strich R (2002) Saccharomyces cerevisiae C-type cyclin Ume3p/Srb11p is required for efficient induction and execution of meiotic development. Eukaryot Cell 1: 66-74. 
• Covitz PA, Herskowitz I, Mitchell AP (1991) The yeast RME1 gene encodes a putative zinc finger protein that is directly repressed by al-a2. Genes Dev 5: 1982-1989. 
• Covitz PA, Mitchell AP (1993) Repression by the yeast meiotic inhibitor RME1. Genes Dev 7: 1598-1608. 
• Engebrecht J (2003) Cell signaling in yeast sporulation.Biochem Biophys Res Commun 306: 325-328. 
• Esposito RE (2006) Meiosis and spore development, pp 157-192. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
• Esposito RE, Klapholz S (1981) Meiosis and ascospore development. In The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: Life cycle and inheritance. Strathern et al., eds, p 211-287. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, CSH, NY.
• Fazzio TG, Kooperberg C, Goldmark JP, Neal C, Basom R, Delrow J, Tsukiyama T (2001) Widespread collaboration of Isw2 and Sin3-Rpd3 chromatin remodeling complexes in transcriptional repression.Mol Cell Biol 21: 6450-6460. 
• Friedlander G, Joseph-Strauss D, Carmi M, Zenvirth D, Simchen G, Barkai N (2006) Modulation of the transcription regulatory program in yeast cells committed to sporulation. Genome Biol 7: R20. 
• Friesen H, Hepworth SR, Segall J (1997) An Ssn6-Tup1-dependent negative regulatory element controls sporulation-specific expression of DIT1 and DIT2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 17: 123-134. 
• Garreau H, Hasan RN, Renault G, Estruch F, Boy-Marcotte E, Jacquet M (2000) Hyperphosphorylation of Msn2p and Msn4p in response to heat shock and the diauxic shift is inhibited by cAMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 146: 2113-2120. 
• Goldmark JP, Fazzio TG, Estep PW, Church GM, Tsukiyama T (2000) The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell 103: 423-433. 
• Govin J, Berger SL (2009) Genome reprogramming during sporulation. Int J Dev Biol 53: 425-432. 
• Guttmann-Raviv N, Martin S, Kassir Y (2002) Ime2, a meiosis-specific kinase in yeast, is required for destabilization of its transcriptional activator, Ime1. Mol Cell Biol 22: 2047-2056. 
• Hayashi M, Ohkuni K, Yamashita I (1998) Control of division arrest and entry into meiosis by extracellular alkalisation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 905-913. 
• Hepworth SR, Friesen H, Segall J (1998) NDT80 and the meiotic recombination checkpoint regulate expression of middle sporulation-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18: 5750-5761. 
• Herskowitz I, Rine J, Strathern JN (1992) Mating-type determination and mating type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: gene expression. Jones EW, Pringle JR, Broach JR, eds, vol 2, pp 583-656. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
• Hirschberg J, Simchen G (1977) Commitment to the mitotic cell cycle in yeast in relation to meiosis. Exp Cell Res 105: 245-252. 
• Hongay CF, Grisafi PL, Galitski T, Fink GR (2006) Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 127: 735-745. 
• Honigberg SM, Lee RH (1998) Snf1 kinase connects nutritional pathways controlling meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4548-4555. 
• Honigberg SM, Purnapatre K (2003) Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast.J Cell Sci 116: 2137-2147. 
• Inai T, Yukawa M, Tsuchiya E (2007) Interplay between chromatin and trans-acting factors on the IME2 promoter upon induction of the gene at the onset of meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 27: 1254-1263. 
• Iwamoto MA, Fairclough SR, Rudge SA, Engebrecht J (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sps1p regulates trafficking of enzymes required for spore wall synthesis. Eukaryot Cell 4: 536-544. 
• Jambhekar A, Amon A (2008) Control of meiosis by respiration. Curr Biol 18: 969-975. 
• Kadosh D, Struhl K (1998) Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 18: 5121-5127. 
• Kassir Y, Adir N, Boger-Nadjar E, Raviv NG, Rubin-Bejerano I, Sagee S, Shenhar G (2003) Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast. Int Rev Cytol 224: 111-171. 
• Kassir Y, Granot D, Simchen G (1988) IME1, a positive regulator gene of meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 52: 853-862. 
• Kassir Y, Simchen G (1976) Regulation of mating and meiosis in yeast by the mating-type region. Genetics 82: 187-206. 
• Kupiec M, Byers B, Esposito RE (1997) Meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In The molecular and cell biology of the yeast Saccharomyces. Pringle JR, Broach JR, Jones EW eds, pp 889-1036. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
• Lamb TM, Mitchell AP (2003) The transcription factor Rim101p governs ion tolerance and cell differentiation by direct repression of the regulatory genes NRG1 and SMP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 23: 677-686. 
• Mallory MJ, Cooper KF, Strich R (2007) Meiosis-specific destruction of the Ume6p repressor by the Cdc20-directed APC/C. Mol Cell 27: 951-961. 
• Matsumoto K, Uno I, Ishikawa T (1983) Initiation of meiosis in yeast mutants defective in adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Cell 32: 417-423. 
• McCord R, Pierce M, Xie J, Wonkatal S, Mickel C, Vershon AK (2003) Rfm1, a novel tethering factor required to recruit the Hst1 histone deacetylase for repression of middle sporulation genes. Mol Cell Biol 23: 2009-2016. 
• McDonald CM, Wagner M, Dunham MJ, Shin ME, Ahmed NT, Winter E (2009) The Ras/cAMP pathway and the CDK-like kinase Ime2 regulate the MAPK Smk1 and spore morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 181: 511-523. 
• Mitchell AP (1994) Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microbiol Rev 58: 56-70. 
• Mitchell AP, Herskowitz I (1986) Activation of meiosis and sporulation by repression of the RME1 product in yeast. Nature 319: 738-742. 
• Mizuno T, Nakazawa N, Remgsamrarn P, Kunoh T, Oshima Y, Harashima S (1998) The Tup1-Ssn6 general repressor is involved in repression of IME1 encoding a transcriptional activator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 33: 239-247. 
• Moreno-Borchart AC, Knop M (2003) Prospore membrane formation: how budding yeast gets shaped in meiosis. Microbiol Res 158: 83-90. 
• Morishita M, Engebrecht J (2005) End3p-mediated endocytosis is required for spore wall formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170: 1561-1574. 
• Morishita M, Mendonsa R, Wright J, Engebrecht J (2007) Snc1p v-SNARE transport to the prospore membrane during yeast sporulation is dependent on endosomal retrieval pathways. Traffic 8: 1231-1245. 
• Neiman AM (1998) Prospore membrane formation defines a developmentally regulated branch of the secretory pathway in yeast. J Cell Biol 140: 29-37. 
• Neiman AM (2005) Ascospore formation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 565-584. 
• Oelschlaegel T, Schwickart M, Matos J, Bogdanova A, Camasses A, Havlis J, Shevchenko A, Zachariae W (2005) The yeast APC/C subunit Mnd2 prevents premature sister chromatid separation triggered by the meiosis-specific APC/C-Ama1. Cell 120: 773-788. 
• Pak J, Segall J (2002) Regulation of the premiddle and middle phases of expression of the NDT80 gene during sporulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22: 6417-6429. 
• Penkner AM, Prinz S, Ferscha S, Klein F (2005) Mnd2, an essential antagonist of the anaphase-promoting complex during meiotic prophase. Cell 120: 789-801. 
• Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K (2003) Un ménage à quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis.Cell 112: 423-440. 
• Pierce M, Benjamin KR, Montano SP, Georgiadis MM, Winter E, Vershon AK (2003) Sum1 and Ndt80 proteins compete for binding to middle sporulation element sequences that control meiotic gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 23: 4814-4825.  
• Primig M, Williams RM, Winzeler EA, Tevzadze GG, Conway AR, Hwang SY, Davis RW, Esposito RE (2000) The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts. Nat Genet 26: 415-423. 
• Pnueli L, Edry I, Cohen M, Kassir Y (2004) Glucose and nitrogen regulate the switch from histone deacetylation to acetylation for expression of early meiosis-specific genes in budding Yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 5197-5208. 
• Rubin-Bejerano I, Mandel S, Robzyk K, Kassir Y (1996) Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1. Mol Cell Biol 16: 2518-2526. 
• Rubin-Bejerano I, Sagee S, Friedman O, Pnueli L, Kassir Y (2004) The In vivo activity of Ime1, the key transcriptional activator of meiosis-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is inhibited by the cyclic AMP/protein kinase a signal pathway through the glycogen synthase kinase 3-β homolog Rim11. Mol Cell Biol 24: 6967-6979. 
• Sagee S, Sherman A, Shenhar G, Robzyk K, Ben-Doy N, Simchen G, Kassir Y (1998) Multiple and distinct activation and repression sequences mediate the regulated transcription of IME1, a transcriptional activator of meiosis-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18: 1985-1995. 
• Santangelo GM (2006) Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70: 253-282. 
• Schaber M, Lindgren A, Schindler K, Bungard D, Kaldis P (2002) CAK1 promotes meiosis and spore formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a CDC28-independent fashion. Mol Cell Biol 22: 57-68. 
• Schlecht U, Erb I, Demougin P, Robine N, Borde V, van Nimwegen E, Nicolas A, Primig M (2008) Genome-wide expression profiling, in vivo DNA binding analysis, and probabilistic motif prediction reveal novel Abf1 target genes during fermentation, respiration, and sporulation in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2193-2207. 
• Shah JC, Clancy MJ (1992) IME4, a gene that mediates MAT and nutritional control of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 12: 1078-1086. 
• Shenhar G, Kassir Y (2001) A positive regulator of mitosis, Sok2, functions as a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1603-1612. 
• Shimizu M, Li W, Shindo H, Mitchell AP (1997) Transcriptional repression at a distance through exclusion of activator binding in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 790-795. 
• Simchen G (2009) Commitment to meiosis: what determines the mode of division in budding yeast? Bioessays 31: 169-177. 
• Simchen G, Piñon R, Salts Y (1972) Sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: premeiotic DNA synthesis, readiness and commitment.Exp Cell Res 75: 207-218. 
• Smith HE, Driscoll SE, Sia RA, Yuan HE, Mitchell AP (1993) Genetic evidence for transcriptional activation by the yeast IME1 gene product. Genetics 133: 775-784. 
• Smith RL, Johnson AD (2000) Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 325-330. 
• Smits GJ, van den Ende H, Klis FM (2001) Differential regulation of cell wall biogenesis during growth and development in yeast. Microbiology 147: 781-794. 
• Steber CM, Esposito RE, Coleman JE (1995) UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1 DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci 4: 1832-1843.  
• Strich R, Surosky RT, Steber C, Dubois E, Messenguy F, Esposito RE (1994) UME6 is a key regulator of nitrogen repression and meiotic development. Genes Dev 8: 796-810. 
• Ufano S, San-Segundo P, del Rey F, Vázquez de Aldana CR (1999) SWM1, a developmentally regulated gene, is required for spore wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19: 2118-2129. 
• van Dyk D, Hansson G, Pretorius IS, Bauer FF (2003) Cellular differentiation in response to nutrient availability: the repressor of meiosis, Rme1p, positively regulates invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 165: 1045-1058. 
• Vershon AK, Pierce M (2000) Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12: 334-339. 
• Vidan S, Mitchell AP (1997) Stimulation of yeast meiotic gene expression by the glucose-repressible protein kinase Rim15p. Mol Cell Biol 17: 2688-2697. 
• Wagner M, Pierce M, Winter E (1997) The CDK-activating kinase CAK1 can dosage suppress sporulation defects of smk1 MAP kinase mutants and is required for spore wall morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 16: 1305-1317. 
• Washburn BK, Esposito RE (2001) Identification of the Sin3-binding site in Ume6 defines a two-step process for conversion of Ume6 from a transcriptional repressor to an activator in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2057-2069. 
• Weber JM, Irlbacher H, Ehrenhofer-Murray AE (2008) Control of replication initiation by the Sum1/Rfm1/Hst1 histone deacetylase. BMC Mol Biol 9: 100. 
• Whitacre JL, Davis DA, Toenjes KA, Brower SM, Adams EM (2001) Generation of an isogenic collection of yeast actin mutants and identification of three interrelated phenotypes. Genetics 157: 533-543. 
• Williams RM, Primig M, Washburn BK, Winzeler EA, Bellis M, de Menthiere CS, Davis RW, Esposito RE (2002) The Ume6 regulon coordinates metabolic and meiotic gene expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13431-13436. 
• Xiao Y, Mitchell AP (2000) Shared roles of yeast glycogen synthase kinase 3 family members in nitrogen-responsive phosphorylation of meiotic regulator Ume6p. Mol Cell Biol 20: 5447-5453. 
• Xie J, Pierce M, Gailus-Durner V, Wagner M, Winter E, Vershon AK (1999) Sum1 and Hst1 repress middle sporulation-specific gene expression during mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 18: 6448-6454. 
• Yoshida M, Kawaguchi H, Sakata Y, Kominami K, Hirano M, Shima H, Akada R, Yamashita I (1990) Initiation of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a novel protein kinase homologue. Mol Gen Genet 221: 176-186. 
• Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR (2008) How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients.Annu Rev Genet 42: 27-81. 
• Zenvirth D, Loidl J, Klein S, Arbel A, Shemesh R, Simchen G (1997) Switching yeast from meiosis to mitosis: double-strand break repair, recombination and synaptonemal complex. Genes Cells 2: 487-498.  
• Zhang Z, Reese JC (2004) Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 39240-39250