Współczesne poglądy na komputerową analizę jakości nasienia

• Autorzy: Antonczyk A. , Nizanski W. , Twardon J. , Kozdrowski R. , Ochota M. , Blasiak K. , Mikolajewska N. , Stanczyk E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Current views on computer assisted sperm analysis

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Until recently, assessment of sperm quality was based on subjective evaluation of parameters such as semen concentration, motility and morphological abnormalities. These methods are influenced by many factors: temperature, evaluator skills and experience, the number of evaluated spermatozoa, difference in sample preparation, etc. Consequently high variations were reported in the estimation of semen quality of the same ejaculate assessed by different observers. Computer assisted semen analysis (CASA), based on individual spermatozoon assessment, offer an accurate and rapid calculation of different semen parameters, such as total motility, progressive motility, linearity, several velocity parameters and morphology. The development and problems related to using CASA technology are raised in this review.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

analiza morfometryczna; jakosc; koncentracja plemnikow; nasienie; ocena jakosci; ruchliwosc plemnikow; samce; system CASA; wspomaganie komputerowe

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 66
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.663-667,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Antonczyk A.

• Katedra Rozrodu z Kliniką Chorób Zwierząt Gospodarskich, Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, pl.Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wrocław

autor

Nizanski W.

autor

Twardon J.

autor

Kozdrowski R.

autor

Ochota M.

autor

Blasiak K.

autor

Mikolajewska N.

autor

Stanczyk E.

Bibliografia

• 1. Abaigar T., Holt W. V., Harrison R. A. P., Barrio G.: Sperm Subpopulations in boar (Sus scrofa) and gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) semen as revealed by pattern analysis of computer-assisted motility assessments. Biol. Reprod. 1999, 60, 32-41.
• 2. Aitken R. J., Best F. M., Richardson D. W., Djahanbakchch O., Less M. M.: The correlates of fertilizing capacity in normal fertile man. Fertil. Steril. 1982, 38, 68-76.
• 3. Aitken R. J., Sutton M., Warner P., Richarson D. W.: Relationship between the movement characteristics of human spermatozoa and their ability to penetrate cervical mucus and zona free hamster oocytes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1985, 73, 441-449.
• 4. Anon.: Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa. Human Reprod. 1998, 13, 142-145.
• 5. Davis R. O., Gravance C. G., Casey P. J.: Automated morphometric analysis of stallion spermatozoa. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1993, 54, 1808-1811.
• 6. Davis R. O., Katz D. F.: Operational standards for CASA instruments. J. Androl. 1993, 14, 385-394.
• 7. Davis R. O., Katz D. F.: Standardization and comparability of CASA instruments. J. Androl. 1992, 13, 81-86.
• 8. Günzel-Apel A. R., Gunther C., Terhaer P., Bader H.: Computer-assisted analysis of motility, velocity and linearity of dog spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1993, 47 (Suppl), 271-278.
• 9. Hirai M., Boersma A., Hoeflich A., Wolf E., Foll J., Aumuller R., Braun J.: Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): Relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J. Androl. 2001, 22, 104-110.
• 10. Hirano Y., Shibahara H., Obara H., Suzuki T., Takamizawa S., Yamaguchi C., Tsunoda H., Sato I.: Relationship between Sperm Motility Characteristics Assessed by the Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) and Fertilization Rate In Vitro. J. of Assisted Reprod. And Gen. 2001, 18, 213-218.
• 11. Iguer-Ouada M., Verstegen J. P.: Evaluation of Hamiton-Thorne computer based automated system for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology 2001, 55, 733-749.
• 12. Kraemer M., Fillion C., Martin-Pont B., Auger J.: Factors influencing human sperm kinematic measurements by the Celltrak computer-assisted spermanalysis system. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 13, 611-619.
• 13. Liu D. Y., Du Plessi Y. P., Nayudu P. L., Johnston W. I. H., Baker H. W. G.: The use of in vitro fertilization to evaluate putative tests of human sperm function. Fertil. Steril. 1988, 49, 272-277.
• 14. Mortimer D., Pandya I. J., Sawers R. S.: Relationship between human motility characteristics and sperm penetration into human cervical mucus in vitro. J. Reprod. Fert. 1986, 78, 93-102.
• 15. Niżański W., Twardoń J., Klimowicz M.: Komputerowo wspomagana analiza jakości nasienia - zasady i możliwości. Życie Wet. 2006, 81, 121-125.
• 16. Nunez-Martinez I., Morgan J. M., Pena F. J.: A Three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulation in canine ejaculated: changes after cryopreservation. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2006, 41, 408-415.
• 17. Nunez-Martinez I., Morgan J. M., Pena F. J.: Sperm index obtained using computer-assisted morphometry provide a forecast of the freezability of canine sperm. Inter. J. Androl. 2007, 30, 182-189.
• 18. Rijsselaere T., Van Soom A., Hoflack G., Meas D., de Kruif A.: Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology 2004, 62, 1292-1306.
• 19. Rijsselaere T., Van Soom A., Meas D., de Kruif A.: Effect of technical setting on canine semen motility parameters measured by the Hamilotn-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1553-1568.
• 20. Root Kustritz M. V.: The value of canine semen evaluation for practitioners. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 329-337.
• 21. Spiropoulos J.: Computerized Semen Analysis (CASA) Effect of Semen Concentration and Chamber Depth on Measurement. Arch. Androl. 2001, 46, 37-42.
• 22. Suarez S. S.: Control of hyperactivation in sperm. Human Repod. Update 2008, 14, 647-657.
• 23. Sukcharoen N.: Definition of the optimal criteria for identifying hyperactivated human spermatozoa at 25HZ using in vitro fertilization as funcional end point. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 2928-2937.
• 24. Takagi H., Kurihara A., Inoue T., Nakamura I., Kiura M.: Investigation of usefulness of sperm analyses in dogs for male fertility study. J. Toxic. Sci. 2001, 26, 313-321.
• 25. Thurston L. M., Watson P. F., Mileham A. J., Holt W. V.: Morphologycal sperm subpopulation defined by fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following crypreservation. J. Androl. 2001, 22, 382-394.
• 26. Turner R. M.: Tales from the tail: what do we really know review about sperm motility? J. Androl. 2003, 24, 790-803.
• 27. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K.: Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 149-179.
• 28. Wessel M. T., Althouse G. C.: Validation of an objective approach for simultaneous assessment of viability and motility of fresh and cooled equine spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 94, 21-22.
• 29. Zhu J. J., Pacey A. A., Barratt C. R. L.: Computer-assisted measurement of hyperactivation in human spermatozoa: differences between European and American versions of the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyser. Hum. Reprod. 1994, 9, 456-462.
• 30. Zinaman M. J., Uhler M. L., Vertuno E., Fisher S. G., Clegg E. D.: Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) with IDENT stain to determine sperm concentration. J. Androl. 1996, 17, 288-292.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu