Operational criteria for genetically defined species: analysis of the diversification of the small fruit-eating bats, Dermanura (Phyllostomidae: Stenodermatinae)

• Autorzy: Solari S. , Hoofer S. R. , Larsen P. A. , Brown A. D. , Bull R. J. , Guerrero J. A. , Ortega J. , Carrera J. P. , Bradley R. D. , Baker R. J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Species diversity and species limits of the small fruit-eating bats, genus Dermanura (Phyllostomidae: Stenodermatinae) were examined. Estimates of species diversity based on classical morphological criteria (current taxonomy) were compared to diversity estimates based on monophyly and cytochrome-b sequence divergence. The most recent taxonomic list included nine species, whereas the genetic based list contained 11: anderseni, azteca, bogotensis, cinerea, glauca, gnoma, phaeotis, rava, rosenbergi, tolteca, and watsoni, of which three (bogotensis Andersen, rava Miller, and rosenbergi Thomas) have been considered synonyms of cinerea, glauca, phaeotis, and tolteca by previous authors. In addition, we consider incomitata to be a synonym of watsoni. Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA sequences resolved the interrelationships among taxa and prompted us to re-evaluate some morphological characters that support the distinction of all the recognized taxa, therefore providing a robust estimate of species status. A phylogenetic tree revealed a geographic component to the diversification of Dermanura, including a historical connection between western Andean and Middle American biota. In South America, no species has been recorded from both sides of the Andes Mountains, and at least one clade (glauca, gnoma, and bogotensis) is restricted to the eastern versant of the Andes. Using genetic data (monophyly and genetic distance) to identify species we were able to produce testable genealogical and biogeographic hypotheses to facilitate further studies.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.279-288,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Solari S.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Hoofer S. R.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Larsen P. A.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Brown A. D.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Bull R. J.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Guerrero J. A.

• Laboratorio de Systematica y Morfologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, C.P. 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

autor

Ortega J.

• Laboratorio de Ictiología y Limnologia, Posgrado en Ciencias Quimico-Biologicas, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Prolongacion de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Sto. Tomas, Mexico City, D. F., 11340, Mexico

autor

Carrera J. P.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Bradley R. D.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

autor

Baker R. J.

• Department of Biological Sciences and the Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

Bibliografia

• Andersen, K. 1906. Brief diagnoses of a new genus and ten new forms of stenodermatous bats. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 18: 419-423.
• Andersen, K. 1908. A monograph of the chiropteran genera Uroderma, Enchistenes, and Artibeus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1908: 204-319.
• Baker, R. J., and R. D. Bradley. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 643-662.
• Baker, R. J., S. R. Hoofer, C. A. Porter, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2003. Diversification among New World leaf-nosed bats: a evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 230: 1-32.
• Barraclough, T. G., and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 391-399.
• Bateson, W. 1909. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Pp. 85-101, in Darwin and modern science (A. C. Seward, ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 595 pp.
• Bradley, R. D., and R. J. Baker. 2001. A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 82: 960-973.
• Brumfield, R. T., and A. P. Capparella. 1996. Historical diversification of birds in northwestern South America: a molecular perspective on the role of vicariant events. Evolution, 50: 1607-1624.
• Cabrera, A. 1958. Catálogo de los Mamíferos de América del Sur. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’. Ciencias Zoológicas, 4: 1-307.
• Carter, D. C., and P. G. Dolan. 1978. Catalogue of type specimens of Neotropical bats in selected European museums. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University, 15: 1-136.
• Corbet, G. B. 1997. The species in mammals. Pp. 34—356, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London, 460 pp.
• Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 545 pp.
• Cracraft, J. 1985. Historical biogeography and patterns of diversification within South American areas of endemism. Pp. 49-84, in Neotropical Ornithology (P. A. Buckley, M. S. Foster, E. S. Morton, R. S. Ridgely, and F. G. Buckley, eds.). American Ornithological Union, Washington, D.C., 1041 pp.
• Cracraft, J. 1997. Species concepts in systematics and conservation biology: an ornithological viewpoint. Pp. 325-339, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London, 460 pp.
• Dalquest, W. W. 1953. Mexican bats of the genus Artibeus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 66: 61-66.
• Davis, W. B. 1958. Review of the Mexican bats of the Artibeus ‘cinereus’ complex. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 71: 163-166.
• Davis, W. B. 1969. A review of the small fruit bats (genus Artibeus) of Middle America. Part I. Southwestern Naturalist, 14: 15-29.
• Davis, W. B. 1970. A review of the small fruit bats (genus Artibeus) of Middle America. Part II. Southwestern Naturalist, 14: 389-402.
• Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, 364 pp.
• Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
• Gervais, M. P. 1856. Chéiroptères sud-américains. Pp. 25-28, in Animaux nouveaux ou rares de l’Amérique du Sud. Mammifères (F. Casttlenau, ed.). Chez P. Bertrand, Paris, 1: 1-116.
• Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 678 pp.
• Handley, C. O., Jr. 1987. New species of mammals from northern South America: fruit-eating bats, genus Artibeus Leach. Fieldiana: Zoology, 39: 163-172.
• Hershkovitz, P. 1949. Mammals of northern Colombia, preliminary report no. 5: bats (Chiroptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 99: 429-454.
• Hillis, D. M., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity, 83: 189-195.
• Hoofer, S. R., S. Solari, P. A. Larsen, R. D. Bradley, and R. J. Baker. 2008. Phylogenetics of the fruit-eating bats (Phyllostomidae: Artibeina) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 277: 1-15.
• Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17: 745-755.
• Kalko, E. K. V., and C. O. Handley, Jr. 1994. Evolution, biogeography, and description of fruit-eating bat, genus Artibeus Leach (1821), from Panama. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 59: 257-273.
• Koopman, K. F. 1978. Zoogeography of Peruvian bats with special emphasis on the role of the Andes. American Museum Novitates, 2652: 1-33.
• Koopman, K. F. 1982. Biogeography of the bats of South America. Pp. 273-302, in Mammalian biology in South America (M. A. Mares and H. H. Genoways, eds.). Special Publications, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, 6, 1-539.
• Larsen, P. A., S. R. Hoofer, M. C. Bozeman, S. C. Pedersen, H. H. Genoways, C. J. Phillips, D. E. Pumo, and R. J. Baker. 2007. Phylogenetics and phylogeography of the Artibeus jamaicensis complex based on cytochrome-b DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy, 88: 712-727.
• Leache, A. D., and T. W. Reeder. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology, 51: 44-68.
• Lim, B. K., M. D. Engstrom, T. E. Lee, Jr., J. C. Patton, and J. W. Bickham. 2004. Molecular differentiation of large species of fruit-eating bats (Artibeus) and phylogenetic relationships based o the cytochrome b gene. Acta Chiropterologica, 6: 1-12.
• Lim, B. K., M. D. Engstrom, H. H. Genoways, F. M. Catzeflis, K. A. Fitzgerald, S. L. Peters, M. Djosetro, S. Brandon, and S. Mitro. 2005. Results of the Alcoa Foundation-Suriname Expeditions. XIV. Mammals of Brownsberg Nature Park, Suriname. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 74: 225-274.
• Longmire, J. L., M. Maltbie, and R. J. Barer. 1997. Use of ‘lysis buffer’ in DNA isolation and its implications for museum collections. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 163: 1-3.
• Maddison, D. R., and W. R. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Marques-Aguiar, S. A. 1994. A systematic review of the large species of Artibeus Leach, 1821 (Mammalia: Chiroptera), with some phylogenetic inferences. Boletim, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Zoologia, 10: 3-83.
• Mayden, R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pp. 381—424, in Species: the units of biodiversity (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London, 460 pp.
• Miller, G. S., Jr. 1902. Twenty new American bats. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1902: 389—412.
• Muller, H. J. 1939. Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 14: 261-280.
• Osgood, W. H. 1916. Mammals of the Collins-Day South American expedition. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 10: 199-216.
• Oxford Molecular Group PLC. 1998. AssemblyLIGN 1.0.9. Oxford Molecular Group PLC, Oxford.
• Patterson, B. D., V. Pacheco, and M. V. Ashley. 1992. On the origins of the western slope region of endemism: systematics of fig-eating bats, genus Artibeus. Memorias del Museo de Historia Natural (Lima), 21: 189-205.
• Patterson, B. D., V. Pacheco, and S. Solari. 1996. Distribution of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the Andes of south-eastern Peru. Journal of Zoology (London), 240: 637-658.
• Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818.
• Redondo, R. A. F., L. P. S. Brina, R. F. Silva, A. D. Ditchfield, and F. R. Santos. 2008. Molecular systematics of the genus Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49: 44-58.
• Reid, F. A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, xiv + 334 pp.
• Saussure, M. H. 1860. Note sur quelques mammifères du Mexique. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, 2, 12: 428—431.
• Simmons, N. B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312-529, in Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.
• Solari, S., and R. J. Baker. 2007. Review of ‘Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (eds.). 2005. Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference’. Journal of Mammalogy, 88: 824-830.
• Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Tamsitt, J. R., D. Valdivieso, and J. Hernandez-Camacho. 1964. Bats of the Bogota Savanna, Colombia, with notes on altitudinal distribution of Neotropical bats. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 12: 107-115.
• Thomas, O. 1893. On some mammals from Central Peru. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1893: 333-341.
• Thomas, O. 1897. Description of new bats and rodents from America. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6, 20: 544-553.
• Thomas, O. 1901. New Myotis, Artibeus, Sylvilagus, and Metachirus from Central and South America. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 7: 541-545.
• Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: 4876-4882.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., R. J. Baker, H. A. Wichman, and M. J. Hamilton. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of Stenodermatini bat genera: congruence of data from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10: 944-959.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., J. L. Hudgeons, and R. J. Baker. 1998. Phylogenetic accuracy, stability, and congruence. Relationships within and among the New World bat genera Artibeus, Dermanura, and Koopmania. Pp. 59-71, in Bat biology and conservation (T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., xiv + 365 pp.
• Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (eds.). 2005. Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/150811009X485521