Assessment of changes in microbial communities in different operational units from a wastewater treatment plant

• Autorzy: Poyraz N. , Mutlu M.B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Microbial communities in wastewater play an important role in treatment, and especially microbial community composition and changes have great influence on biological treatment. In these cases, monitoring and evaluating the changes with practical methods becomes important. Ecoplates may be an effective and quick method for assessing microbial activity. Therefore, we observed, with Ecoplates, the microbial community function of different operational units from wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater and sludge samples used in the study were taken from different units of a sewage treatment plant located in the Eskisehir in two different time intervals. Changes in wastewater samples’ metabolic diversity and microbial activity were evaluated. High similarity rates were obtained from samples, as indicated by the diversity indices and average well color development (AWCD) values. A return activated sludge pump and anaerobic digestion unit were highly active in the community. Low substrate usage rates were observed in the secondary classifier unit and the lowest used substrate was 2-hydroxybutyric acid from the carboxylic acid group. The most actively used substrates were from the carbohydrate group substrates. These results refer to the degradation capacity. In addition, results showed that sampling intervals and operational conditions caused changes in the functional diversity of communities. This study allowed us to gather general information about microbial community structures in different operational units of wastewater treatment systems. The results obtained from the study showed that this method is useful for monitoring the treatment process, bacterial changes, and operational parameters.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 26
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.1615-1625,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Poyraz N.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Anadolu University, TR 26470 Eskisehir, Turkey

autor

Mutlu M.B.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Anadolu University, TR 26470 Eskisehir, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. MCMARTHY J.J., CANZIANI O.F., LEARY N.A., DOKKEN D.J., WHİTE K.S. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2001.
• 2. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/nr/water/index.html. 2008.
• 3. NIELSEN P.H., KRAGELUND C., SEVIOUR R.J., NIELSEN J.L. Identity and ecophysiology of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbial. Rev. 33 (6), 969, 2009.
• 4. NIELSEN P.H., SAUNDERS A.M., HANSEN A.A., LARSEN P., NIELSEN J.L. Microbial communities involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater-a model system in environmental biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23 (3), 452, 2012.
• 5. SCHMIDT I., SLIEKERS O., SCHMID M., BOCK E., FUERST J., KUENEN J.G., JETTEN M.S.M., STROUS M. New concepts of microbial treatment processes for the nitrogen removal in wastewater. FEMS Microbial. Rev. 27 (4), 481, 2003.
• 6. YUAN Z., BLACKALL L.L. Sludge population optimisation: a new dimension for the control of biological wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 6 (2), 482, 2002.
• 7. CURTIS T.P., SLOAN W.T. Towards the design of diversity: stochastic models for community assembly in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 54 (1), 227, 2006.
• 8. MCMAHON K.D., MARTIN H.G., HUGENHOLTZ P. Integrating ecology into biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18 (3), 287, 2007.
• 9. NIELSEN P.H., MIELCZAREK A.T., KRAGELUND C., NIELSEN J.L., SAUNDERS A. M., KONG Y., HANSEN A.A., VOLLERTSEN J. A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Water Res. 44 (17), 5070, 2010.
• 10. BOCHNER B.R., GADZINSKI P., PANOMITROS E. Phenotype MicroArrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function. Genome Res. 11, 1246, 2001. pmid:11435407 doi: 10.1101/gr.186501
• 11. BRADLEY R.L., SHIPLEY B., BEAULIEU C. Refining numerical approaches for analyzing soil microbial community catabolic profiles based on carbon source utilization patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 629, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.002
• 12. GARLAND J., MILLS A. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, 2351, 1991. pmid:16348543
• 13. KENAROVA A,, RADEVA G., TRAYKOV I., BOTEVA S. Community level physiological profiles of bacterial communities inhabiting uranium mining impacted sites. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 100, 226, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.012
• 14. KIRK J.L., BEAUDETTE L.A., HART M., MOUTOGLIS P., KLIRONOMOS J.N., LEE H., TREVORS, J. T., Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J. Microbiol. Methods. 58 (2), 169, 2004. pmid:15234515
• 15. PRESTON-MAFHAM J., BODDY L., RANDERSON P.F. Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole-carbon-source utilization profiles-a critique. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 42, 1, 2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00990.x. pmid:19709261
• 16. STEFANIS C., ALEXOPOULOS A., VOIDAROU C., VAVIAS S., BEZIRTZOGLOU E. Principle methods for isolation and identification of soil microbial communities. Folia Microbiol. 58, 61, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12223-012-0179-5
• 17. WIDMER F., FLIEΒBACH A., LACZKO E., SCHULZE-AURICH J., ZEYER J. Assessing soil biological characteristics: a comparison of bulk soil community DNAPLFA-, and Biolog™-analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1029, 2001. doi: 10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00006-2
• 18. REASONER D.J., GELDREICH E.E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49 (1), 1, 1985.
• 19. ZAK J.C., WILLIG M.R., MOORHEAD D.L., WILDMAN H.G. Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26 (9), 1101, 1994.
• 20. WEBER K.P., LEGGE R.L. One-dimensional metric for tracking bacterial community divergence using sole carbon source utilization patterns. J. Microbiol. Methods. 79 (1), 55, 2009.
• 21. CLASSEN A.T., BOYLE S.I., HASKINS K.E., OVERBY S.T., HART S.C. Community-level physiological profiles of bacteria and fungi: plate type and incubation temperature influences on contrasting soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 44, 319, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00068-0. PMID:19719613.
• 22. GARLAND J.L., MILLS A.L., YOUNG J.S. Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on communitylevel physiological profiles (CLPP). Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1059, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00011-6. PMID:12194184.
• 23. GOMEZ E., GARLAND J., CONTİ M. Reproducibility in the response of soil bacterial community-level physiological profiles from a land use intensification gradient. Appl. Soil Ecol. 26, 21, 2006.
• 24. JAŁOWIECKI Ł., CHOJNIAK J.M., DORGELOH E., HEGEDUSOVA B., EJHED H., MAGNÉR J., PŁAZA G.A. Microbial Community Profiles in Wastewaters from Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Technology. PloS one, 11 (1), e0147725, 2016.
• 25. GRYTA A., FRĄC M., OSZUST K. The application of the Biolog EcoPlate approach in ecotoxicological evaluation of dairy sewage sludge. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 174 (4), 1434, 2014.
• 26. MICHALSKA J., WOJCIESZYŃSKA D., GREŃ I. Investigation of functional diversity and activated sludge condition using Biolog® system. ACEE. 9 (1), 119, 2016.
• 27. GERARDI M.H. Wastewater bacteria (Vol. 5). John Wiley & Sons., 2006.
• 28. PAUL D., PANDEY G., MEİER C., VAN DER MEER J.R., JAİN R.K. Bacterial community structure of a pesticidecontaminated site and assessment of changes induced in community structure during bioremediation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 57, 116, 2006.
• 29. STEFANOWICZ A. The Biolog plates technique as a tool in ecological studies of microbial communities. Pol. J. Envıron. Stud. 15 (5), 669, 2006.
• 30. AL-MUTAIRI N.Z. Variable distributional characteristics of substrate utilization patterns in activated sludge plants in Kuwait. Bioresource Technol. 100, 1524, 2009
• 31. SALA M.M., ARRİETA J.M., BORAS J.A., DUARTE C.M., VAQUE D. The impact of ice melting on bacterioplankton in the Arctic Ocean. Polar Biol. 33, 1683, 2010.
• 32. GARCIA S.N., CLUBBS R.L., STANLEY J.K., SCHEFFE B., YELDERMAN Jr J.C., BROOKS B.W. Comparative analysis of effluent water quality from a municipal treatment plant and two on-site wastewater treatment systems. Chemosphere 92, 38, 2013
• 33. MORETTI G., MATTEUCCI F., ERCOLE C., VEGLIÒ F., DEL GALLO M. Microbial community distribution and genetic analysis in a sludge active treatment for a complex industrial wastewater: a study using microbiological and molecular analysis and principal component analysis. Ann. Microbiol. 66 (1), 397, 2016.
• 34. CHOJNIAK J., JAŁOWIECKI Ł., DORGELOH E., HEGEDUSOVA B., EJHED H., MAGNÉR J., PŁAZA G. Application of the BIOLOG system for characterization of Serratia marcescens ss marcescens isolated from onsite wastewater technology (OSWT). Acta Biochim. Pol. 62 (4), 799, 2015.
• 35. MANDAL H. Influence of wastewater pH on turbidity. J. Environ. Res. Develop. 7 (2), 105, 2011.
• 36. ALWAN G.M. pH-control Problems of wastewater treatment plants. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, 4 (2), 37, 2008.
• 37. ZAVERI P., MUNSHI N., VAIDYA A., JHA S., KUMAR G. N. Functional microbial diversity dynamics in common effluent treatment plants of South Gujarat and hydrocarbon degradation. Can. J. Microbiol. 61 (6), 389, 2015.
• 38. CARDINALI-REZENDE J., MORAES A. M., COLTURATO L. F., CARNEIRO E. V., MARRIEL I. E., CHARTONE-SOUZA E., NASCIMENTO A. M. Phylogenetic and physiological characterization of organic waste-degrading bacterial communities. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27 (2), 245,2011.
• 39. WANG J.L., ZHAN X.M., FENG Y.C., QIAN Y. Effect of salinity variations on the performance of activated sludge system. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 18 (1), 5, 2005.
• 40. BAYSAL A., OZBEK N., AKMAN S. Determination of trace metals in waste water and their removal processes. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2013.
• 41. CECCHINI G., CIRELLO P., ERAMO B. Partitioning dynamics and fate of metals in an urban wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 14 (7), 1511, 2015
• 42. EL-LATHY A.M., EL-TAWEEL G.E., EL-SONOSY M.W., SAMHAN F. A., MOUSSA T. A. Determination of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater using conventional and PCR techniques. Environ Biotechnol. 5, 73, 2009.
• 43. KAPANEN A., VIKMAN M., RAJASARKKA J., VIRTA M., ITAVAARA M. Biotests for environmental quality assessment of composted sewage sludge. Waste Manage. 33, 1451, 2013.
• 44. LI J., YU S. Changes in the structure and diversity of bacterial communities during the process of adaptation to organic wastewater. Can. J. Microbiol. 56, 352, 2010. doi: 10.1139/w10-009 PMID: 20453903
• 45. FRĄC M., OSZUST K., LIPIEC J. Community level physiological profiles (CLPP), characterization and microbial activity of soil amended with dairy sewage sludge. Sensors, 12 (3), 3253-3268, 2012.
• 46. ALBRECHT R., PÉRİSSOL C., RUAUDEL F., LE PETIT J., TERROM G. Functional changes in culturable microbial communities during a co-composting process: Carbon source utilization and co-metabolism. Waste Manage., 30 (5), 764, 2010.
• 47. CHAZARENC F., BRISSON J., MERLIN G. Seasonal and spatial changes of microorganism communities in constructed wetlands: a community level physiological profiling analysis. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010.
• 48. LIU W., PAN N., CHEN W., JIAO W.,WANG M. Effect of veterinary oxytetracycline on functional diversity of soil microbial community. Plant, Soil and Environ. 58 (7), 295, 2012.
• 49. WANG P., YU Z., ZHAO J., ZHANG H. Seasonal Changes in Bacterial Communities Cause Foaming in a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Microbial Ecol. 71 (3), 660, 2016.
• 50. VON SPERLING M. (Ed.). Activated sludge and aerobic biofilm reactors (Vol. 5). IWA publishing. 2007
• 51. PHADTARE S. Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 6 (2), 125, 2004.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/68870