Uproszczony model rozkładu pierśnic jednowiekowych niepielęgnowanych drzewostanów sosnowych (Pinus sylvestris L.)

• Autorzy: Jagiello R. , Beker C.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Simplified model of diameter distribution for even-aged unthinned Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Although modelling of the diameter at the breast height (DBH) distributions has long history, theoretical discrete distributions have not so far been used for this purpose. In this study we use measurements covering 25 years (six inventories) without silvicultural influence on 14 even−aged Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands to develop the DBH distribution models. Analysed stands are located in Murowana Goślina Forest Experimental Station (W Poland). The objective of the study was to elaborate the most simplified model that applies stand variables easy to assess and uncomplicated theoretical distribution. We employed two−parameter Gamma Poisson (GP) distribution and compared it to Weibull (W) and Sb Johnson (SbJ) ones. When maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was used, GP gave similar results to W and both were slightly worse than SbJ. We found that both DBH standard deviation and stand density have substantial impact for model bias when above distributions used. Stepwise regression analysis was used for obtaining linear equations for parameter prediction of GP distribution. Then, GP model was simplified by removing standard deviation of DBH (SDD) from equation for overdispersion parameter. Results showed slight increase in mean of error values (i.e. modified Reynolds e index and root mean square error) for simplified model (SGP) compared with those for model including SDD, but differences in means were insignificant. Minimal and mean DBH represent enough variability of diameter distribution to obtain appropriate model based on Gamma Poisson distribution. Error was only 5% greater from four−parameter SbJ (MLE) distribution with similar range: 8.2−28.8% against 5.1−25.5% for SGP and SbJ respectively. The presented model can be used in many branches of forestry for more accurate calculation of stand level variables, when additional allometric equations employed, for instance assimilation apparatus volume or below− and above− ground biomass.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; dendrometria; sosna zwyczajna; Pinus sylvestris; drzewostany sosnowe; drzewostany jednowiekowe; drzewostany niepielegnowane; rozklad piersnic; rozklad uproszczony; rozklad gamma

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 161
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.822-830,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Jagiello R.

• Instytut Dendrologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, ul.Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kórnik

autor

Beker C.

• Katedra Urządzania Lasu, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznań

Bibliografia

• Beker C., Andrzejewski T. 2013a. Model wzrostu niepielęgnowanych drzewostanów sosnowych I. Lokalny model referencyjny PINUS ZIELONKA. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria 12 (3): 5-13.
• Beker C., Andrzejewski T. 2013b. Model wzrostu niepielęgnowanych drzewostanów sosnowych II. Lokalny model bonitacyjny PINUS. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria 12 (3): 15-23.
• Bliss C. I. 1938. The Transformation of Percentages for Use in the Analysis of Variance. The Ohio Journal of Science 38 (1): 9-12.
• Burkhart H. E., Tomé M. 2012. Diameter-distribution models for even-aged stands. W: Burkhart H. E., Tomé M. [red.]. Modeling Forest Trees and Stands. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht – Heidelberg – New York – London. 261-297.
• Cao Q. V. 2004. Predicting Parameters of a Weibull Function for Modeling Diameter Distribution. Forest Science 50 (5): 682-685.
• Hyink D. M., Moser Jr. J. W. 1983. A generalized framework for projecting forest yield and stand structure using diameter distributions. Forest Science 29 (1): 85-95.
• Jagiełło R., Beker C., Jagodziński A. M. 2016. Ocena zgodności rozkładów empirycznych pierśnic drzewostanów bukowych różnych klas wieku z wybranymi rozkładami teoretycznymi. Sylwan 160 (2): 107-119.
• Jagodziński A. M., Oleksyn J. 2009a. Ekologiczne konsekwencje hodowli drzew w różnym zagęszczeniu. I. Wzrost i rozwój drzewostanu. Sylwan 153 (2): 75-85.
• Jagodziński A. M., Oleksyn J. 2009b. Ekologiczne konsekwencje hodowli drzew w różnym zagęszczeniu. II. Pro-dukcja i alokacja biomasy, retencja biogenów. Sylwan 153 (3): 147-157.
• Jagodziński A. M., Oleksyn J. 2009c. Ekologiczne konsekwencje hodowli drzew w różnym zagęszczeniu. III. Stabilność drzewostanu, fitoklimat i różnorodność biologiczna. Sylwan 153 (4): 219-230.
• Johnson N. L. 1949. Systems of Frequency Curves Generated by Methods of Translation. Biometrika 36 (1): 149-176.
• Kerr G. 2014. The management of silver fir forests: de Liocourt (1898) revisited. Forestry 87 (1): 29-38.
• Maltamo M., Puumalainen J., Päivinen R. 1995. Comparison of Beta and Functions for modelling basal area diameter distribution in stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 10 (1-4): 284-295.
• Nord-Larsen T., Cao Q. V. 2006. A diameter distribution model for even-aged beech in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 231 (1-3): 218-225.
• Palahí M., Pukkala T., Blasco E., Trasobares A. 2007. Comparison of beta, Johnson's SB, Weibull and truncated Weibull functions for modeling the diameter distribution of forest stands in Catalonia (north-east of Spain). European Journal of Forest Research 126 (4): 563-571.
• Podlaski R. 2016. Highly skewed and heavy-tailed tree diameter distributions: approximation using the gamma shape mixture model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 46 (11): 1275-1283.
• Podlaski R., Roesch F. A. 2013. Aproksymacja rozkładów pierśnic drzew w drzewostanach dwugeneracyjnych za pomocą rozkładów mieszanych. II. Testy zgodności. Sylwan 157 (9): 652-661.
• Repola J. 2009. Biomass Equations for Scots Pine and Norway Spruce in Finland. Silva Fennica: 43 (4): 625-647.
• Reynolds M. R., Burk T. E., Huang W.-C. 1988. Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Model Selection Procedures for Diameter Distribution Models. Forest Science 34 (2): 373-399.
• Siekierski K. 1992. Comparison and evaluation of three methods of estimation of the Johnson SB distribution. Biometrical Journal 34: 879-895.
• Socha J., Wężyk P. 2007. Allometric equations for estimating the foliage biomass of Scots pine. European Journal of Forest Research 126 (2): 263-270.
• Turski M., Beker C., Kaźmierczak K., Najgrakowski T. 2008. Allometric equations for estimating the mass and volume of fresh assimilational apparatus of standing scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees. Forest Ecology and Management 255 (7): 2678-2687.
• Weibull W. 1951. A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 18 (3): 293--297.
• Zhang L., Packard K. C., Liu C. 2003. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnsons SB distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33 (7): 1340-1347.
• Zhou B., McTague J. P. 1996. Comparison and evaluation of five methods of estimation of the Johnson system parameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 (6): 928-935.