Response of tomato genotypes to salinity stress assessed at the seedlings stage

• Autorzy: Smolik M. , Kram P. , Krupa-Malkiewicz M. , Smolik B. , Malinowska K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

tomato; Solanum lycopersicum; Awizo F1 cultivar; Pokusa cultivar; Malinowy Ozarowski cultivar; genotype; salinity stress; seedling stage; proline; abiotic stress; drought; physiological adaptation; root system

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Biology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 14
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl

Twórcy

autor

Smolik M.

• Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Slowackiego St. 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Kram P.

autor

Krupa-Malkiewicz M.

autor

Smolik B.

autor

Malinowska K.

Bibliografia

• 1. Alian A., Altman A., Heuer B. 2000. Genotypic difference in salinity and water stress tolerance of fresh market tomato cultivars. Plant Sci. 152: 59-65.
• 2. Bahaji A., Mateu L., Sanz A., Cornejo M.J. 2002. Common and distinctive responses of rice seedlings to saline- and osmotically- generated stress. Plant Growth Reg. 38: 83-94.
• 3. Bates L.S., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
• 4. Cano E.A., Perez-Alfocea F., Moreno V., Caro M., Bolarin M.C. 1998. Evaluation of salt tolerance in cultivated and wild tomato species trough in vitro shoot apex culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 53: 19-26.
• 5. Cuartero J., Fernandez-Munoz R. 1999. Tomato and salinity. Sci. Hort. 78: 83-125.
• 6. Cuartero J., Bolarin M.C., Asins M.J., Moreno V. 2006. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J Exp. Bot. 57(5): 1045-1058.
• 7. Flowers T.J. 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp. Bot. 55(396): 307-319.
• 8. Goel D., Singh A.K., Yadav V., Babbar S.B. 2010. Overexpression of osmotin gene confers tolerance to salt and drought stresses in transgenetic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Protoplasma 245(1-4): 133-141.
• 9. Hare P.D., Cress W.A. 1997. Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Reg. 21: 79-102.
• 10. Lutts S., Kinet J.M., Bouharmont J. 1996. Effect of salt stress on growth, mineral nutrition and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Plant Growth Reg. 19: 207-218.
• 11. Petrusa L.M., Winicov I. 1997. Proline status in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive alfalfa cell lines and plants in response to NaCl. Plant Phys. Bioch. 35(4): 303-310.
• 12. Rzepka-Plevnes D., Grabiec M., Smolik M., Kowalczys K. 2004. Variation of some tomato species (Lycopersicon sp.) in respect to salt tolerance of medium. Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin. Agricultura 234(93): 341-348 (in Polish).
• 13. Rzepka-Plevnes D., Kulpa D., Smolik M., Główka M. 2007. Somaclonal variation in tomato L. pennelli and L. peruvianum f. glandulosum characterized in respect to salt tolerance. JFAE 5(2): 194-201.
• 14. Rzepka-Plevnes D., Krupa-Małkiewicz M., Twardowska M., Kurek J., Wyborska K. 2008. Variability of rye varieties and breeding strains tested for tolerance to drought in in vitro cultures. JFAE 6(2): 265-271.
• 15. Szabados L., Savoure A. 2009. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science 15(2): 89-97.
• 16. Trovato M., Matiioli R., Constantino P. 2008. Multiple roles of proline in plant stress tolerance and development. Rendiconti Lincei 19: 325-346.
• 17. Ueda A., Yamamoto-Yamane Y., Takabe T. 2007. Salt stress enhances proline utilization in the apical region of barley roots. Bioch. Bioph. Research Comm. 355: 61-66.
• 18. Viegas, R.A.; Silveira, J.A.G. 1999. Ammonia assimilation and proline accumulation in young cashew plants during long term exposure to NaCl-salinity. Braz. J. of Plant Physiol., 11(3): 153-159.