PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 20 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Detection of experimental swine trichinellosis using commercial ELISA test

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of the study carried out on ten young (10-week old) pigs of the native Polish Large White breed experimentally infected with a low dose of 300 invasive muscle larvae (ML) of Trichinella spiralis was intravital detection of trichinellosis using the E-S ELISA test, determination of a variation level of IgG antibodies against excretory-secretory (E-S) antigens of T. spiralis muscle larvae and finally, describing the intensity of T. spiralis larvae infection in selected muscles. The pig sera were collected at 7 and 9 days prior to the experimental infection with T. spiralis and at 9, 14, 20, 23, 25, 27, 30, 33, 37, 41, 46 days post-infection (d.p.i.). The anti-T. spiralis IgG antibodies were detected by a commercial E-S ELISA test (PrioCHECK Trichinella Ab). Average intensity of the T. spiralis infection in the examined muscles of pigs ranged from 1.52 up to 43.09 larvae/g. The studies revealed that the E-S antigen in the ELISA test did not show cross-reaction with the sera of pigs infected with Oesophagostomum spp. The ELISA assay did not recognize trichinellosis in pigs until 27 days after the T. spiralis infection. The anti-T. spiralis IgG antibodies were first detected on day 30 post-infection. A statistically significant increase of IgG antibodies against T. spiralis ML E-S antigens was first observed between days 27-30 (p<0.01) post-infection, and a further significant rise in the antibody level occurred between days 27 and 33 (p<0.01); 30 and 33 (p<0.01); 33 and 37 (p<0.05) following infection.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

20

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.445-454,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Food Hygiene of Animal Origin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Witold Stefanski Institute of Parasitology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Food Hygiene of Animal Origin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 12, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Campbell WC (1983) Epidemiology I: Modes of transmission. In: Campbell WC (ed) Trichinella and trichinosis. Plenum Press, New York, USA, pp 425-444.
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1375 of 10 August 2015 laying down specific rules on official controls for Trichinella in meat (O.J.L 212, 11.8.2015, pp 7-34).
  • EFSA (2005) European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on the risk assessment of a revised inspection of slaughter animals in areas with low prevalence of Trichinella. EFSA Journal 200: 1-41.
  • Forbes LB, Gajadhar AA (1999) A validated Trichinella digestion assay and an associated sampling and quality assurance system for use in testing pork and horse meat. J Food Prot 62: 1308-1313.
  • Gajadhar AA, Pozio E, Gamble HR, Nöckler K, Maddox-Hyttel C, Forbes LB, Vallée I, Rossi P, Marinculić A, Boireau P (2009) Trichinella diagnostics and control: mandatory and best practices for ensuring food safety. Vet Parasitol 159: 197-205.
  • Gamble HR (1996) Detection of trichinellosis in pigs by artificial digestion and enzyme immunoassay. J Food Prot 59: 295-298.
  • Gamble HR (1998) Sensitivity of artificial digestion and enzyme immunoassay methods of inspection for trichinae in pigs. J Food Prot 61: 339-343.
  • Gamble HR, Anderson WR, Graham CE, Murrell KD (1983) Diagnosis of swine trichinosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an excretory-secretory antigen. Vet Parasitol 13: 349-361.
  • Gamble HR, Pozio E, Bruschi F, Nöckler K, Kapel CM, Gajadhar AA (2004) International Commission on Trichinellosis: recommendations on the use of serological tests for the detection of Trichinella infection in animals and man. Parasite 11: 3-13.
  • General Veterinary Inspectorate (2016) Veterinary statistical reporting: http://old.wetgiw.gov.pl/index.php?action=art&a–id=4239.
  • Gómez-Morales MA, Ludovisi A, Amati M, Bandino E, Capelli G, Corrias F, Gelmini L, Nardi A, Sacchi A, Cherchi S, Lalle M, Pozio E (2014) Indirect versus direct detection methods of Trichinella spp. infection in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Parasit Vectors 7: 171.
  • Gómez-Morales MA, Ludovisi A, Pezzotti P, Amati M, Cherchi S, Lalle M, Pecoraro F, Pozio E, Ring Trial Participans (2009) International ring trial to detect anti-Trichinella IgG by ELISA on pig sera. Vet Parasitol 166: 241-248.
  • Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K (2009) Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 22: 127-145.
  • Kapel CM, Gamble HR (2000) Infectivity, persistence, and antibody response to domestic and sylvatic Trichinella spp. in experimentally infected pigs. Int J Parasitol 30: 215-221.
  • Kapel CM, Webster P, Gamble HR (2005) Muscle distribution of sylvatic and domestic Trichinella larvae in production animals and wildlife. Vet Parasitol 132: 101-105.
  • Kapel CM, Webster P, Lind P, Pozio E, Henriksen SA, Murrell KD, Nansen P (1998) Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, and T. nativa: infectivity, larval distribution in muscle, and antibody response after experimental infection of pigs. Parasitol Res 84: 264-271.
  • Kocięcka W, Boczoń K, Pozio E, van Knapen F (2003) Trichinella. In: Miliotis MD, Bier JW (ed) International handbook of foodborne pathogens. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA, pp 637-658.
  • Kořínková K, Kovařčík K, Pavlíčková Z, Svoboda M, Koudela B (2008) Serological detection of Trichinella spiralis in swine by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) using an excretory-secretory (E/S) antigen. Parasitol Res 102: 1317-1320.
  • Kotula AW, Murrell KD, Acosta – Stein L, Lamb L (1984) Distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae in selected muscles and organs of experimentally infected swine. J Anim Sci 58: 94-98.
  • Nöckler K, Kapel CMO (2007) Detection and surveillance for Trichinella: meat inspection and hygiene, and legislation. In: Dupouy-Camet J, Murrell KD (eds) FAO/WHO/OIE guidelines for the surveillance, management, prevention and control of trichinellosis. World Organisation for Animal Health Press, Paris, France, pp 69-97.
  • Nöckler K, Pozio E, Voigt WP, Heidrich J (2000) Detection of Trichinella infection in food animals. Vet Parasitol 93: 335-350.
  • Nöckler K, Serrano FJ, Boireau P, Kapel CM, Pozio E (2005) Experimental studies in pigs on Trichinella detection in different diagnostic matrices. Vet Parasitol 132: 85-90.
  • Nöckler K, Voigt WP, Protz D, Miko A, Ziedler K (1995) Diagnosis of trichinellosis in living pigs using indirect ELISA. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 108: 167-174.
  • OIE (2012) Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (mammals, birds and bees). 7th ed., World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France, pp 305-313.
  • Pozio E (1998) Trichinellosis in the European Union: epidemiology, ecology and economic impact. Parasitol Today 14: 35-38.
  • Pozio E (2000) Factors affecting the flow among domestic, synanthropic and sylvatic cycles of Trichinella. Vet Parasitol 93: 241-262.
  • Pozio E, Rinaldi L, Marucci G, Musella V, Galati F, Cringoli G, Boireau P, La Rosa G (2009) Hosts and habitats of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi in Europe. Int J Parasitol 39: 71-79.
  • Prost EK, Nowakowski Z (1990) Detectability of Trichinella spiralis in muscles by pooled-sample-digestion-method. Fleischwirtschaft 70: 593-595.
  • Reiterová K, Dubinský P, Klimenko VV, Tomašovičová O, Dvorožňáková E (1999) Comparison of Trichinella spiralis larva antigens for the detection of specific antibodies in pigs. Vet Med-Czech 44: 1-5.
  • Serrano FJ, Pérez-Martin JE, Reina D, Navarrete I, Kapel CM (1999) Influence of infection intensity on predilection sites in swine trichinellosis. J Helminthol 73: 251-254.
  • Smith HJ (1987) Evaluation of the ELISA for the serological diagnosis of trichinosis in Canadian swine. Can J Vet Res Res 51: 194-197.
  • Smith HJ (1988) Comparison of pepsin-digestion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of trichinosis in swine. Can J Vet Res 52: 63-66.
  • Smith HJ, Snowdon KE (1989) Comparative assessment of a double antibody enzyme immunoassay test kit and a triple antibody enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis spiralis and Trichinella spiralis nativa infections in swine. Can J Vet Res 53: 497-499.
  • Van der Leek ML, Dame JB, Adams CL, Gillis KD, Littell RC (1992) Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of trichinellosis in swine. Am J Vet Res 53: 877-882.
  • Zarlenga DS, Chute MB, Martin A, Kapel CM (1999) A multiplex PCR for unequivocal differentiation of all encapsulated and non-encapsulated genotypes of Trichinella. Int J Parasitol 29: 1859-1867.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-ebfe817c-bec5-4a45-bd67-188b081bca63
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.