Wpływ dodatku naświetlanych promieniami podczerwonymi nasion grochu w mieszankach dla brojlerów na status zdrowotny i wybrane wskaźniki produkcyjne

• Autorzy: Kiczorowska B. , Samolinska W. , Grela E.R. , Andrejko D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Effect of infrared-irradiated pea seeds in mixtures for broilers on the health status and selected performance indicators of the birds

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to examine the possibility of substituting infrared-irradiated pea seeds for soybean meal as a protein source in mixtures for broiler chicks, and to determine the impact of such substitution on selected indicators of the performance and health status of the birds. The study was conducted on 150 308 Ross chickens divided into three groups: control (K), group I, and group II. The mixture for the control group was based on cereals and soybean meal (SBM), whereas in groups I and II, 50% and 100% of SBM protein, respectively, were replaced with protein from infrared-irradiated pea seeds. Bird performance was measured in body weight gains and feed consumption, and EWW was calculated. Nutrient digestibility coefficients were also calculated, and slaughter analyses were performed. In blood samples, hematological and biochemical indicators were estimated to evaluate the health of the birds. The complete replacement of soybean meal with pea seeds resulted in a decrease (P < 0.05) of average daily gains of chickens in group II of up to 17%. Production performance in group I after a partial (50%) replacement of SBM with pea seeds was similar to that in the control group. The digestibility of basic nutrients in the final period of fattening was similar in all groups. The replacement of soybean meal with peas did not affect slaughter performance or the proportion of breast muscles and leg muscles in the carcass. Compared with the control group, in both experimental groups a decrease was noted (P < 0.05) in the Ht value (by 23% and 19% in groups I and II, respectively), and in group I a lower (P < 0.05) RBC count (by 16%) was observed. A decreased count of WBC (P < 0.05) (by 14% and 24% in groups I and II, respectively) and a reduced total cholesterol level (by about 15% in both experimental groups) were observed as well. In the blood of birds from group II, the total protein was reduced (P < 0.05) by approximately 9% and uric acid by 19% in comparison with the control. The AST activity in group I was lower (P < 0.05) than in the control. In both groups receiving irradiated peas in mixtures, urea in blood was reduced (P < 0.05) compared with the control birds (by approximately 14% and 12% for groups I and II, respectively). No differences in ALP, ALT and LDH activities were noted among the groups. The results confirm the usefulness of substituting irradiated pea seeds for 50% of soybean meal protein in mixtures for broiler chicken.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

drob; kurczeta brojlery; zywienie zwierzat; nasiona straczkowe; groch; promieniowanie podczerwone; nasiona naswietlane; wyniki produkcyjne; masa ciala; zuzycie paszy; upadki zwierzat; wydajnosc rzezna; zdrowotnosc zwierzat; badania krwi; wskazniki biochemiczne; wskazniki hematologiczne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 71
• Numer: 09
• Opis fizyczny: s.583-588,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kiczorowska B.

• Instytut Żywienia Zwierząt i Bromatologii, Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Samolinska W.

• Instytut Żywienia Zwierząt i Bromatologii, Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Grela E.R.

• Instytut Żywienia Zwierząt i Bromatologii, Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Andrejko D.

• Katedra Biologicznych Podstaw Technologii Żywności i Pasz, Wydział Inżynierii Produkcji, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin

Bibliografia

• 1. Alonoso R., Aguirre A., Marzo F.: Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 159-165.
• 2. Anon.: Smulikowska S., Rutkowski A (red): Zalecenia żywieniowe i wartość pokarmowa pasz – normy żywienia drobiu. Instytut Fizjologii i Żywienia Zwierząt, Wyd. IV, Warszawa 2005.
• 3. AOAC.: Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edition. Association of Analytical Communities. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC), Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.
• 4. Arnoldi A.: Thermal processing and food quality: analysis and control. Thermal Technologies in Food Processing. F. Richardson (ed.). Woodhead Publ. Limited, Cambridge, England 2001.
• 5. Banaś K.: Kształtowanie się opłacalności produkcji drobiarskiej na przykładzie ferm Polski południowej. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. 2009, 2, 12, 13-18.
• 6. Campbell T. W.: Avian hematology and cytology, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA 1995.
• 7. Das T. K., Mondal M. K., Biswas P., Bairagi B., Samanta C. C.: Influence of level of dietary inorganic and organic copper and energy level on the performance and nutrient utilization of boiler chickens. Asian.-Aust. J. Amin. Sci. 2010, 231, 82-89.
• 8. Eggum B. O.: Blood urea measurement as a technique for assessing protein quality. Brit. J. Nutr. 1970, 24, 4, 983-988.
• 9. Ekman P., Emanuelson H., Fransson A.: Investigations concerning the digestibility of protein in poultry. KGL Lantbruks – Hogskol Ann. 1949, 16, 749-776.
• 10. Europejskie Tabele Wartości Energetycznej Pasz dla Drobiu: European Table of Energy Values for Poultry Feedstuffs. World Poultry Science Association European Federation of Branches of the WPSA, Beekbergen, The Netherlandes 1986.
• 11. Ganong W. F.: Review of medical physiology. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York 2005.
• 12. Goelema O., Smits A., Vaessen L. M., Wemmers A.: Effects of pressure toasting, expander treatment and pelleting on in vitro and in situ parameters of protein and starch in a mixture of broken peas, lupins and faba beans. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1999, 78, 109-126.
• 13. Goering H. K., Van Soest P. J.: Forage Fiber Analysis. USDA Agricult. Handbook 1970, 379-381.
• 14. Grahame R., Simmonds H. A., Carrey E.: Gout: The at Your Fingertips Guide. Class Publishing Ltd., London, UK 2003.
• 15. Harr K. E.: Clinical chemistry of companion avian species: a review. Vet. Clin. Path. 2002, 31, 3, 140-151.
• 16. Kaneko J. J., Harvey J. W., Bruss M. L.: Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. Elsevier, Academic Press, Burlingtton, USA 2008.
• 17. Kussaibat R., Leclercq B.: A simplified rapid method for the determination of apparent and true metabolizable energy values of poultry feed. Arch. Geflugelkd. 1985, 49, 54-62.
• 18. Kwiecień M.: Wpływ formy i poziomu miedzi żelaza na wyniki odchowu praz wybrane wskaźniki metaboliczne kurcząt brojlerów. Rozprawa hab. nr 359, Wyd. UP w Lublinie, 2012.
• 19. Laudadio V., Tufarelli V.: Dehulled-micronised lupin (Lupinus albus L. cv. Multitalia) as the main protein source for broilers: influence on growth performance, carcass traits and meat fatty acid composition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2081-2087.
• 20. Laudadio V., Tufarelli V.: Growth performance and carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing micronized-dehulled peas (Pisum sativum cv. Spirale) as a substitute of soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1537-1543.
• 21. Lumeij J. T.: The diagnostic value of plasma proteins and non-protein nitrogen substances in birds. Vet. Quarterly. 1987, 9, 3, 262-268.
• 22. Nowaczewski S., Kontecka H.: Haematological indices, size of erythrocytes and haemoglobin saturation in broiler chickens kept in commercial conditions Anim. Sci. Papers Rep. 2012, 30, 181-190.
• 23. Nwabueze T. U.: Effect of process variables on trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA), phytic acid and tannin content of extruded African breadfruit–corn–soy mixtures: A response surface analysis. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 4, 21-29.
• 24. Piecyk M., Wołosiak R., Drużynka B., Worobiej E.: Chemical composition and starch digestibility in flours from Polish processed legume seeds. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1057-1064.
• 25. Roy F., Boye J. I., Simpson B. K.: Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 2, 432-442.
• 26. Sobotka W., Stanek M., Bogusz J.: The Effect of Oligosaccharides and Alkaloids Contained in Yellow and Blue Lupine Seeds on Fermentation Processes in the Cecum of Rats. Vet. Zootech. (Vet. Med. Zoot.), 2013, 63, 85, 63-70.
• 27. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, USA 2013. www.statsoft.com.
• 28. Valencia D. G., Serrano M. P., Jiménez-Moreno E., Lázaro R., Mateos G. G.: Ileal digestibility of amino acids of pea protein concentrate and soya protein sources in broiler chicks. Livest. Sci. 2009, 121, 1, 21-27.
• 29. Vasconcelos I. M., Oliveira J., Tadeu A.: Antinutritional properties of plant lectins. Toxicon. 2004, 44, 385-403.
• 30. Thrall M. A.: Veterinary Haematology and Clinical Chemistry. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA 2004.
• 31. Weiss D. J., Wardrop K. J. (Eds.): Schalm’s veterinary hematology. John Wiley&Sons, Iowa, USA 2011.
• 32. Wężyk S., Herbut E., Wawrzyński M.: Dobra pasza z „Dobropaszu”. Polskie Drobiarstwo 1996, 9, 30.
• 33. Williams B. A., Verstegen M. W. A., Tamminga S.: Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2001, 14, 207-227.