Wpływ gospodarki leśnej na na wybrane gatunki małych ssaków

• Autorzy: Bogdziewicz M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Influence of forest management on ground-dwelling small mammals

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Maintaining biological diversity is one of the main goals of modern forestry. To reach this objective we need to know how management practices affect forest species. This study summarizes the results published in papers on the influence of clear−cutting on small mammals. Most of the studied species increased in abundance on clear−cuts. The response of voles (Microtus agrestis and M. arvalis) was uniformly positive. Mice (Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus) and shrews (Sorex araneus and S. minutus) varied in their responses but generally their number increased on clear−cuts. Bank voles (Myodes glareolus) appeared to be associated with the heterogeneity of habitat rather than with the age of forest stands per se. Nevertheless, our knowledge on the effects of forest management on small mammals is far from complete. In particular, there are almost no studies on the subject conducted in Western Europe or concerning management practices other than clear−cutting.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; gospodarka lesna; pozyskiwanie drewna; rebnie zupelne; oddzialywanie na zwierzeta; drobne ssaki; ryjowka aksamitna; Sorex araneus; ryjowka malutka; Sorex minutus; nornica ruda; Clethrionomys glareolus; nornik bury; Microtus agrestis; nornik zwyczajny; Microtus arvalis; mysz lesna; Apodemus flavicollis; mysz zaroslowa; Apodemus sylvaticus; liczebnosc

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 157
• Numer: 07
• Opis fizyczny: s.546-552,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bogdziewicz M.

• Zakład Zoologii Systematycznej, Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza, ul.Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań

Bibliografia

• Angelstam P., Hansson L., Pehrsson S. 1987. Distribution borders of field mice Apodemus: the importance of seed abundance and landscape composition. Oikos 50 (1): 123−130.
• Angelstam P., Kuuluvainen T. 2004. Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape structures: a European perspective. Ecological Bulletins 51: 117−136.
• Borowski Z. 2003. Habitat selection and home range size of field voles Microtus agrestis in Słowiński National Park, Poland. Acta theriologica 48 (3): 325−333.
• Borowski Z. 2007. Damage caused by rodents in Polish forests. International Journal of Pest Management 53 (4): 303−310.
• Bryja J., Heroldová M., Zejda J. 2002. Effects of deforestation on structure and diversity of small mammal communities in the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts (Czech Republic). Acta Theriologica 47 (3): 295−306.
• Čepelka L., Suchomel J., Purchart L., Heroldová M. 2011. Small mammal diversity in the Beskydy Mts. forest ecosystems subject to different forms of management. Beskydy 4: 101−107.
• Charles W. 1981. Abundance of field voles (Microtus agrestis) in conifer plantations. W: Last F. T. [red.]. Forest and woodland ecology. Institiute of Terrestial Ecology, Cambridge. 135−137.
• Churchfield S., Hollier J., Brown V. 1997. Community structure and habitat use of small mammals in grasslands of different successional age. Journal of Zoology 242 (3): 519−530.
• Ecke F., Löfgren O., Sörlin D. 2002. Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to forest age and structural habitat factors in northern Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 39 (5): 781−792.
• Fisher J. T., Wilkinson L. 2005. The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mammal Review 35 (1): 51−81.
• Gorini L., Linnell J. D. C., Boitani L., Hauptmann Um, Odden M., Wegge P., Nilsen E. B. 2011. Guild composition and habitat use of voles in 2 forest landscapes in south−eastern Norway. Integrative Zoology 6 (4): 299−310.
• Grodziński W. 1959. The succession of small mammal communities on an overgrown clearing and landslip mountain in the Beskid Sredni (Western Carpathians). Ekologia Polska, Serie A 7:83−143.
• Hansson L. 1974. Small mammal productivity and consumption in spruce forest and reforestation in South Sweden. Oikos 25 (2): 153−156.
• Hansson L. 1978. Small mammal abundance in relation to environmental variables in three Swedish forest phases. Studia Forestalia Suecica 147.
• Hansson L. 1992a. Landscape ecology of boreal forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7 (9): 299−302.
• Hansson L. 1992b. Small mammal communities on clearcuts in a latitudinal gradient. Acta Oecologica 13: 687−699.
• Hansson L. 1994. Vertebrate distributions relative to clear−cut edges in a boreal forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 9 (2): 105−115.
• Hansson L. 1996. Habitat selection or habitat−dependent survival: on isodar theory for spatial dynamics of small mammals. Oikos 75 (3): 539−542.
• Hansson L. 2002. Consumption of bark and seeds by voles in relation to habitat and landscape structure. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17 (1):28−34.
• Henttonen H., Hansson L. 1984. Interspecific relations between small rodents in European boreal and subarctic environments. Acta Zool Fennica 172: 61−65.
• Henttonen H., Kaikusalo A., Tast J., Viitala J. 1977. Interspecific competition between small rodents in subarctic and boreal ecosystems. Oikos 29 (3): 581−590.
• Heroldová M. 1992. The diet of Microtus agrestis in immission clearings in the Krušné hory Mts. Folia Zoologica 41: 11−18.
• Heroldová M., Bryja J., Zejda J., Tkadlec E. 2007. Structure and diversity of small mammal communities in agriculture landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 120 (2−4): 206−210.
• Horváth G., Molnár D., Csonka G. 2005. Population dynamics and spatial pattern of small mammals in protected forest and reforested area. Natura Somogyiensis 7: 191−207.
• Jensen T. 1984. Habitat distribution, home range and movements of rodents in mature forest and reforestations. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 305−307.
• Jędrzejewska B., Jędrzejewski W. 1998. Predation in vertebrate communities: the Białowieża Primeval Forest as a case study. Springer−Verlag, Berlin.
• Jones C. G., Ostfeld R. S., Richard M. P., Schauber E. M., Wolff J. O. 1998. Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science 279 (5353): 1023−1026.
• Keenan R. J., Kimmins J. 1993. The ecological effects of clear−cutting. Environmental Reviews 1 (2): 121−144.
• Kirkland G. L. 1977. Responses of small mammals to the clearcutting of northern Appalachian forests. Journal of Mammalogy 58 (4): 600−609.
• Kirkland G. L. 1990. Patterns of initial small mammal community change after clearcutting of temperate North American forests. Oikos 59 (3): 313−320.
• Korpimäki E., Krebs C. J. 1996. Predation and population cycles of small mammals. BioScience 46 (10): 754−764.
• Korpimäki E., Norrdahl K. 1989. Avian and mammalian predators of shrews in Europe: regional differences, between−year and seasonal variation, and mortality due to predation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26: 389−400.
• Löfgren O. 1995. Niche expansion and increased maturation rate of Clethrionomys glareolus in the absence of competitors. Journal of Mammalogy 76 (4): 1100−1112.
• Marsh A., Harris S. 2000. Partitioning of woodland habitat resources by two sympatric species of Apodemus: lessons for the conservation of the yellow−necked mouse A. flavicollis in Britain. Biological Conservation 92 (3): 275−283.
• Montgomery W. 2008. Studies on the distributions of Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) and A. flavicollis (Melchior) in Britain. Mammal Review 8 (4): 177−184.
• Niedziałkowska M., Kończak J., Czarnomska S., Jędrzejewska B. 2010. Species diversity and abundance of small mammals in relation to forest productivity in northeast Poland. Ecoscience 17 (1): 109−119.
• Panzacchi M., Linnell J. D. C., Melis C., Odden M., Odden J., Gorini L., Andersen R. 2010. Effect of land−use on small mammal abundance and diversity in a forest−farmland mosaic landscape in south−eastern Norway. Forest Ecology and Management 259 (8): 1536−1545.
• Petty S. 2006. Diet of tawny owls (Strix aluco) in relation to field vole (Microtus agrestis) abundance in a conifer forest in northern England. Journal of Zoology 248 (4): 451−465.
• Rychlik L. 2000. Habitat preferences of four sympatric species of shrews. Acta Theriologica 45 (1): 173−190.
• Schickmann S., Urban A., Kräutler K., Nopp−Mayr U., Hackländer K. 2012. The interrelationship of mycophagous small mammals and ectomycorrhizal fungi in primeval, disturbed and managed Central European mountainous forests. Oecologia 170 (2): 395−409.
• Sidorovich V. E., Solovej I. A., Sidorovich A. A., Rotenko I. I. 2008. Effect of felling on the distribution of rodents and their predators in a transitional mixed forest. Polish Journal of Ecology 56 (2): 309−321.
• Simberloff D. 1999. The role of science in the preservation of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 115 (2−3): 101−111.
• Sundell J., Church C., Ovaskainen O. 2012. Spatio−temporal patterns of habitat use in voles and shrews modified by density, season and predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 81 (4): 747−755.
• Voutilainen L., Savola S., Kallio E. R., Laakkonen J., Vaheri A., Vapalahti O., Henttonen H. 2012. Environmental Change and Disease Dynamics: Effects of Intensive Forest Management on Puumala Hantavirus Infection in Boreal Bank Vole Populations. PloS ONE 7: e39452.
• Wołk E., Wołk K. 1982. Responses of small mammals to the forest management in the Bialowieza primeval forest. Acta Theriologica 27: 45−49.
• Zwolak R. 2009. A meta−analysis of the effects of wildfire, clearcutting, and partial harvest on the abundance of North American small mammals. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 539−545.
• Zwolak R., Crone E. E. 2012. Quantifying the outcome of plant−granivore interactions. Oikos 121 (1): 20−27.
• Zwolak R., Pearson D. E., Ortega Y. K., Crone E. E.. 2010. Fire and mice: Seed predation moderates fire’s influence on conifer recruitment. Ecology 91 (4): 1124−1131.