Zachowania kompulsywne u zwierząt futerkowych

• Autorzy: Swiecicka N.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Compulsive behavior in fur animals

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Fur animals kept indoors, due to partial limitation of their natural behavior, are more likely to develop behavioral disorders. This is due to negative emotions associated with inability to satisfy certain needs or achieve a particular purpose, which leads to frustration or deprivation in animals. This condition can lead to the emergence of compulsive behaviors, which are often a form of coping with stress. Compulsive behaviors in fur animals are usually stereotypical: animals walk along the cage, catch their own tail, gnaw fur (trichotilomanie), or bite the trellis or the claws. The environmental factors resulting from the maintenance conditions and social relations of the animals in the group play an important role in the emergence of this type of behavior. Another factor that is equally important in causing compulsive behavior is mental strain resulting from disease.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zwierzeta futerkowe; zachowanie sie zwierzat; stresy; zaburzenia zachowania; zachowania kompulsywne; stereotypie; przyczyny

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 74
• Numer: 07
• Opis fizyczny: s.421-425,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Swiecicka N.

• Katedra Nauk o Zwierzętach, Zakład Hodowli Owiec, Kóz i Zwierząt Futerkowych, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy w Bydgoszczy, ul.Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz

Bibliografia

• Ahola L., Mononen J., Mohaibes M.: Effects of access to extra cage constructions including a swimming opportunity on the development of stereotypic behaviour in singly housed juvenile farmed mink (Neovison vison). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 134, 201-208.
• Barabasz B.: Współczesne badania nad dobrostanem norek. Zesz. Nauk. Przegl. Hod. 2002, 64, 7-18.
• Bashaw M., Tarou L. R., Maki T. S., Maple T.: A survey assessment of variables related to stereotypy in captive giraffe and okapi. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 73, 235-247.
• Bergeron R., Badnell-Waters A. J., Lambton S., Mason G.: Stereotypic oral behaviour in captive ungulates: foraging, diet and gastrointestinal function, [w:] Mason G., Rushen J. (red.): Stereotypic Animal Behaviour/Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford 2006, s. 19-57.
• Cooper J. J., Mason G. J.: The use of operant technology to measure behavioural priorities in captive animals. Behav. Res. Meth., Instr. Comp. 2001, 33, 427-434.
• Cooper J. J., Nicol C. J.: Stereotypic behaviour affects environmental preference in bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Anim. Behav. 1991, 41, 971-977.
• Cooper J. J., Nicol C. J.: The coping hypothesis of stereotypic behaviour: a reply to Rushen. Anim. Behav. 1993, 45, 616-618.
• Franchi V., Aleuy O. A., Tadich T. A.: Fur chewing and other abnormal repetitive behaviors in chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera), under commercial fur-farming conditions. J. Vet. Behav. 2016, 11, 60e64.
• Ganszczyk K.: Zachowania samouszkadzające o podłożu psychogennym u zwierząt – analiza przyczyn w kontekście możliwości leczenia. Życie Wet. 2010, 85, 674-679.
• Gorajewska E., Filistowicz A., Nowicki S., Nawrocki Z., Przysiecki P.: Wpływ typu zachowania samic lisa polarnego (Vulpes lagopus) na wyniki użytkowości reprodukcyjnej. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 2012, 8, 55-62.
• Guja I.: Wstępna ocena polimorfizmu genu Slitrk 1 u szynszyli hodowlanych z zaburzeniami obsesyjno-kompulsywnymi. VI Konferencja Biologii Molekularnej Łódź, 6-8 kwietnia 2017, s. 73.
• Hansen B. K.: Stereotypic behaviour in farm mink. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 2010, 127, 64-73.
• Hansen C. P. B., Jeppesen L. L.: Short term behavioural consequences of denied access to environmental facilities in mink. Agric. Food Sci. Finland 2000, 9, 149-155.
• Hansen C. P. B., Jeppesen L. L.: Swimming activity of farm mink (Mustela vison) and its relation to stereotypies. Acta Agric. Scand. A 2001, 51, 71-76.
• Hansen S. W., Jeppesen L. J.: Temperament, stereotypies and anticipatory behaviour as measures of welfare in mink. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 99, 172-182.
• Hansen S. W., Malmkvist J., Palme R., Damgaard B. M.: Do double cages and access to occupational materials improve the welfare of farmed mink? Anim. Welf. 2007, 16, 63-76.
• Hewson C. J., Luescher U. A.: Compulsive disorders in dogs, [w:] Voith V. L., Borchelt P. L. (red.): Readings in Companion Animal Behaviour. Veterinary Learning Systems, Trenton, NJ 1996, s. 153-158.
• Hill S. P., Wehnelt S., Sanderson S., Holmes E., Rowlands T.: Changes in behaviour of a spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) following dental treatment, [w:] Hiddinga B. (red.): Proc. EAZA Conference, Bristol 6-10 September 2005, s. 229-230.
• Jeppesen L. L., Heller K. E., Bildsøe M.: Stereotypies in female farm mink (Mustela vison) may be genetically transmitted and associated with higher fertility due to effects on body weight. Appl Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 86, 137-143.
• Kaleta T.: Zachowanie stereotypowe – jego charakterystyka i rola w dobrostanie zwierząt. Życie Wet. 2003, 78, 266-270.
• Korhonen H. T., Jauhiainen L., Niemelä P.: Effect of swimming deprivation on adrenocortical and behavioural responses in farmed mink (Mustela vison). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2003, 3, 145-163.
• Kowalska D., Gugołek A.: Wykorzystanie testu „otwartego pola” w badaniach dotyczących zachowania królików. Wiad. Zoot. 2015, 3, 40-44.
• Kukekova A. V., Acland G. M., Oskina I. N., Kharlamova A. V., Trut L. N., Chase K., Lark K. G., Erb H. N., Aguirre G. D.: The genetics of domesticated behavior in canids: What can dogs and silver foxes tell us about each other? The dog and its genome. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY 2005, s. 515-537.
• Latham N., Mason G.: Frustration and perseveration in stereotypic captive animals: Is a taste of enrichment worse than none at all? Behav. Brain. Res. 2010, 211, 96-104.
• Latham N., Mason G. J.: Maternal deprivation and the development of stereotypic behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 84-108.
• Luescher A.: Compulsive behavior in companion animals, [w:] Houpt K. A. (red.): Recent Advances in Companion Animal Behavior Problems. International Veterinary Information Service 2000 (www.ivis.org).
• Lutz C., Well A., Novak M.: Stereotypic and self-injurious behavior in rhesus macaques: a survey and retrospective analysis of environment and early zexperience. Am. J. Primatol. 2003, 60, 1-15.
• Łapinski S., Lis M. W., Wójcik A., Migdal L., Guja I.: Analysis of factors increasing the probability of fur chewing in chinchilla (Chinchilla lanígera) raised under farm conditions. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 189-195.
• Malmkvist J., Hansen S. W.: The welfare of farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to behavioural selection: A review. Anim. Welf. 2001, 10, 41-52.
• Malmkvist J., Jeppesen L. L., Palme R.: Stress and stereotypic behaviour in mink (Mustela vison): A Focus on adrenocortical activity. STRESS 2011, 14, 312-323.
• Mason G.: A decade-or-more’s progress in understanding stereotypic behaviour, [w:] Mason G., Rushen J. (red.): Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford 2006, s. 1-18.
• Mason G.: Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim. Behav. 1991, 41, 1015-1037.
• Mason G., Clubb R., Latham N., Vickery S.: Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 102, 163-188.
• Mason G., Latham N.: Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator. Anim. Welf. 2004, 13, 57-69.
• McBride S. D., Hemmings A.: Altered mesoaccumbens and nigro-stratial dopamine physiology is associated with stereotypy development in a non-rodent species. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 159, 113-118.
• Meagher R. K., Dallaire J. A., Campbell D. L., Ross M., Møller S. H., Hansen S. W., Mason G. J.: Benefits of a ball and chain: Simple environmental enrichments improve welfare and reproductive success in farmed American mink (Neovison vison). PLOS One 2014, 9, e110589.
• Meagher R. K., Mason G. J.: Environmental enrichment reduces signs of boredom in caged mink. PLOS One 2012, 7, 11, e49180.
• Mononen J., Mølle S. H., Hansen S. W., Hovland A. L., Koistinen T., Lidfors L., Ahola L.: The development of on-farm welfare assessment protocols for foxes and mink: the Wel Fur project. Anim. Welfare-The UFAW J. 2012, 21, 363.
• Möstl E., Palme R.: Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest. Anim. Endocrin. 2002, 23, 67-74.
• Nimon A. J., Broom D. M.: The welfare offarmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to housing and management: a review. Anim. Welf. 1999, 8, 205-228.
• Novak M. A., Meyer J. S., Lutz C., Tiefenbacher S.: Deprived environments: developmental insights from primatology, [w:] Mason G., Rushen J. (red.): Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford 2006, s. 153-189.
• Passini A., Kaleta T.: Porównanie zachowania się serwala (Leptailurus serval) i ocelota (Leopardus pardalis) w ogrodzie zoologicznym. Przegl. Zool.1999, 43, 161-171.
• Rushen J.: The „coping” hypothesis of stereotypic behaviour. Anim. Behav. 1993, 45, 613-615.
• Sergiel A., Maślak R., Kusznierz J., Paśko Ł.: Stereotypie – rozwój i skutki występowania. Med. Weter. 2012, 68, 402-405.
• Sergiel A., Maślak R., Kusznierz J., Paśko Ł.: Zachowania stereotypowe – przegląd definicji i klasyfikacji. Med. Weter. 2012, 68, 45-48.
• Skovgaard K., Jeppesen L. L., Hansen C. P. B.: The effect of swimming water and cage size on the behaviour of ranch mink (Mustela vison). Scientifur 1997, 21, 253-260.
• Svendsen P. M., Hansen B. K., Malmkvist J., Hansen S. W., Palme R., Jeppesen L. L.: Selection against stereotypic behaviour may have contradictory consequences for the welfare of farm mink (Mustela vison). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 107, 110-119.
• Ślaska B., Jeżewska-Witkowska G.: Wykorzystanie testów behawioralnych do oceny dobrostanu reprodukcyjnego szynszyli (Chinchilla lanigera Molina, 1782). Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 2008, 4, 323-335.
• Tadich T., Franchi V., Navarrete D.: Tricofagia en chinchillas (Chinchilla lanígera): Un problema de bienestar animal. Av. Cs. Vet. 2013, 28, 41-48.
• Terlouw E. M. C., Lawrence A. B., Illius A. W.: Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of sterotypies in sows. Anim. Behav. 1991, 42, 981-991.
• Tisljar M., Janic D., Grabarevic Z., Marinculic A., Pinter L., Janicki Z., Nemanic A.: Stress induced cushing’s syndrome in fur chewing chinchillas. Acta. Vet. Hung. 2002, 50, 133-142.
• Toates F.: Stereotypies, [w:] Toates F. (red.): Stress/Conceptual and Biological Aspects. John Wiley & Sons, Baffins Lane, Chichester 1995, s. 215-151.
• Vickery S., Mason G.: Understanding stereotypies in captive bears: the first step towards treatment. Proc. Fifth Ann. Symp. on Zoo Research, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK 2003, s. 38-51.
• Vinke C. M., van den Bos R., Spruijt B. M.: Anticipatory activity and stereotypical behaviour in American mink (Mustela vison) in three housing systems differing in the amount of enrichments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 89, 145-161.
• Wechsler B.: Coping and coping strategies: a behavioural view. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995, 43, 123-134.
• Wemelsfelder F.: The concept of animal boredom and its relationship to stereotyped behaviour, [w:] Lawrence A. B., Rushen J. (red.): Stereotypic Animal Behaviour/Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford 1993, s. 65-95.
• Zanella A. J., Broom D., Hunter J. C., Mendl M. T.: Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiol. Behav. 1996, 59, 769-775.
• Zieliński D., Ślaska B.: Wykorzystanie testów behawioralnych w ocenie temperamentu mięsożernych zwierząt futerkowych. Wiad. Zoot. 2015, 3, 54-59.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21521/mw.5999