Antropokinezjologia - uniwersalna i interdyscyplinarna nauka o ruchach człowieka, jej kształtowanie się i podstawowa treść

• Autorzy: Starosta W.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Anthropokinesiology - universal and interdisciplinary science of human movement, its development and fundamental content .

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Man, when creating modern civilization which releases him from pursuing „hard” physical labor, did not see that the increasing level of technical equipment also requires a high level of manifestation of various movement abilities, particularly those of coordination. The desirable abilities and qualities of a good employee have become: precision of movements, speed and adequacy of reactions, ability to differentiation movements, space-time orientation, adaptation to changing conditions and others. They require an effective functioning of the nervous system. The results of research showed a 93% decrease in the human movement activity in the years 1864–1964. This caused a decrease in the level of movement fitness, and along with it an increase of overweight people of all ages amounting to 1.600 million people worldwide. According to forecasts by the World Health Organization this number may increase by 40% in 2017. A comprehensive approach to the importance of movement was presented by Aristotle, who expressed the relationship very briefly: „Movement is life.” He pointed at the forefront importance of movement by stating: our life begins with it and ends with it. All our creative and reproductive activities, regardless of their nature – productive, professional, artistic, everyday or sport – always manifest themselves in movement! Movement is a universal expression of every living organism! Some consider Aristotle as the father of the science of movement others consider N. Dally who was the author of the first textbook on „Cinesiologie” which contained studies of human movements and their relation to education, hygiene and therapy. The scientific justification for movement became possible only in the twentieth century. N.A. Bernstein with his fundamental works: „The building of movements” and „Outline of physiology of movements and physiology of activities” contributed significantly to the understanding of the essence of movement. His works were much ahead of the times in which he lived himself. N. Bernstein was considered as one of the founders of modern science of movements. This science has many names. The multitude and variety of names demonstrates the interest by numerous specialists of various areas of expertise in this scientific discipline, which has been developing over the years. This interest is justified as the science of movement has a universal meaning. The development of a new scientific discipline opens up enormous and little-known research area. Therefore, it creates prospects for the multi-interdisciplinary research. Out of the proposed names the most appropriate seem to be kinesiology or anthropokinesiology, although the first concept may also apply to animals, whereas the second defines precisely the subject of interest. This name indicates the independence of scientific discipline and emphasizes its scientific status. Its tradition dates back to nearly 160 years, when in 1857 N. Dally called his book „Cinesiologie”. The multiplicity of names reveals the range of the thematic study about movement, as well as the number of competitors among which the competition takes place. Part of this naming emphasizes human movements combined with the structure of the body (Anthropomotorics, Kinantropology, Anthropomaximology), or with psychic manifestations (Psychomotorics, Sensomotorics)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Aktywność Ruchowa Ludzi w Różnym Wieku
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 1[29]
• Opis fizyczny: s.35-45,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Starosta W.

• Instytut Sportu w Warszawie, Międzynarodowe Stowarzyszenie Motoryki Sportowej, Warszawa

Bibliografia

• 1. Berg M.A. et al. (1994), Health behavior among adult population. Sprong 1993, Helsinki, National Public Health Institute.
• 2. Starosta W. (2008), Stronne zróżnicowanie techniki ćwiczeń zawodników rozmaitych dyscyplin sportu. Międzynarodowe Stowarzyszenie Motoryki Sportowej. Wyższa Szkoła Wychowania Fizycznego i Turystyki w Supraślu. Warszawa–Supraśl.
• 3. Starosta W. (2010), Human movement science – anthropokinesiology. International Association of Sport Kinetics. IASK Library – Vol. 32. Institute of Sport in Warsaw.
• 4. Doński D. (1963), Biomechanika ćwiczeń fizycznych. Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.
• 5. Meinel K. (1962), Bewegungslehre (Versuch einer Theorie der sportlichen Bewegung unter padagogischem Aspekt. Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin
• 6. Meinel K. (1967), Motoryczność ludzka (zarys teorii czynności sportowych i działań ruchowych z punktu widzenia pedagogicznego). Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.
• 7. Osiński W. (2000), Antropomotoryka. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Poznań.
• 8. Ćelikovski S. (1979), Antropomotoryka. SPN, Praha.
• 9. Renson R. (1999), New insights in the biography and scientific background of Nicolas Dally (1795–1862), father of kinesiology (1857). International Conference ”Kinesiology for the 21st Century”, Faculty of Physical Education University Zagreb, 106–107.
• 10. Bernstein N.A. (1947), Uber den Aufbau der Bewegungen. Moskau.
• 11. Bernstein N.A. (1966), Grundzuge der Physiologie der Bewegungen und der Physiologie der Aktivitat. Moskau.
• 12. Blahus P. (1999), Measuring and modeling motor abilities as concept formation in scientific theory building in kinanthropology. International Conference „Kinesiology for the 21st Century”, Faculty of Physical Education University Zagreb, 43–50.
• 13. Thomas J.R., Nelson J.K. (1990), Research methods in physical activity. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL.
• 14. Wuest D.A., Bucher C.A. (1991), Foundation of physical and sport, 11th ed. Mosby Year Book. Inc., St. Louis.
• 15. Renson R. (1989), From physical education to kinanthropology. A quest for academic anal professional identity. „Quest”, nr 41, s. 235–256.
• 16. Jable J.T. (1997), Whatever Happened to Physical Education? Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Physical Education, nr 1, s. 77–93.
• 17. Osiński W. (1991), Zagadnienia motoryczności człowieka. Wyd. 2. popr. i uzup. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Poznań.
• 18. Osiński W. (1993), Morfologiczne uwarunkowania motoryczności człowieka, w: Motoryczność człowieka – jej struktura, zmienność i uwarunkowania, red. W. Osiński, Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Poznań.
• 19. Szopa J. (1992), Zarys antropomotoryki. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Kraków.
• 20. Starosta W. (1991), Przyczyny powołania i zakres działalności Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Motoryki Sportowej. „Antropomotoryka”, nr 5, s. 69–82.
• 21. Starosta W. (2007), 15th Anniversary of establishment and development of the IASK. International Association of Sport Kinetics. Institute of Sport. Faculty of Physical Culture of Poznan University School of Physical Education in Gorzów, Warsaw.
• 22. Szopa J., Mleczko E., Cempla J. (1985), Zmienność oraz genetyczne i środowiskowe uwarunkowanie podstawowych cech psychomotorycznych i fizjologicznych w populacji wielkomiejskiej w przedziale wieku 7–62 lat. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Kraków.
• 23. Osiński W. (2000), Antropomotoryka. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego, Poznań.