Alokacja nadziemnej biomasy u sosen zajmujących różne pozycje biosocjalne w drzewostanie

• Autorzy: Ochal W. , Grabczynski S. , Orzel S. , Wertz B. , Socha J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Aboveground biomass allocation in Scots pines of different biosocial positions in the stand

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the biosocial position occupied by the tree on the amount and structure of the biomass produced. The empirical material was measurements of biomass for 63 pines (21 for each of the I, II, and III Kraft classes). The total aboveground biomass of the trees was calculated as sum of following fractions: stem wood, stem bark, living branches, dead branches, shoots, needles and cones. It has been found that with a decrease of biosocial position of tree the share of a stem increases while share of branches in the overall biomass of the tree decreases. On the other hand biosocial position does not affect significantly the share of needles, dead branches and cones.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; drzewa lesne; pozycja biosocjalna drzew; sosna zwyczajna; Pinus sylvestris; biomasa nadziemna; alokacja biomasy

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 157
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.737-746,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Ochal W.

• Katedra Biometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Wydział Leśny, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków

autor

Grabczynski S.

• Katedra Biometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Wydział Leśny, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków

autor

Orzel S.

• Katedra Biometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Wydział Leśny, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków

autor

Wertz B.

• Katedra Biometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Wydział Leśny, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków

autor

Socha J.

• Katedra Biometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Wydział Leśny, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Kraków

Bibliografia

• Baskerville G. L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2: 49−53.
• Eriksson E. 2006. Thinning operations and their impact on biomass production in stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biomass and Bioenergy 30 (10): 848−854.
• Franklin O., Johansson J., Dewar R. C., Dieckmann U., McMurtrie R. E., Brännström A., Dybzinski R. 2012. Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles. Tree Physiology 32 (6): 648−666.
• Gayon J. 2000. History of the Concept of Allometry. Integrative and Comparative Biology 40 (5): 748−758.
• Jelonek T., Pazdrowski W., Tomczak A., Szaban J. 2008. The effect of social position of tree in the stand and site on wood quality of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 11 (2).
• Jelonek T., Pazdrowski W., Walkowiak R., Arasimowicz−Jelonek M., Tomczak A. 2011. Allometric Models of Foliage Biomass in Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Polish Journal of Environment Study 20 (2): 355−364.
• Kellomäki S. 1981. Effect of the within−stand light conditions on the share of stem, branch and needle growth in a twenty−year−old Scots pine stand. Silva Fennica 15 (2): 130−139.
• Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Heikkinen J., Sievänen R., Liski J. 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 188 (1−3): 211−224.
• Litton C. M., Raich J. W., Ryan M. G. 2007. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology 13 (10): 2089−2109.
• Mäkinen H. 1996. Effect of intertree competition on biomass production of Pinus sylvestris (L.) half−sib families. Forest Ecology and Management 86: 105−112.
• Mátyás C., Varga G. 2000. Effect of intra−specific competition on tree architecture and aboveground dry matter allocation in Scots pine. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, Fuera de Serie 1: 111–119.
• Naidu S. L., Delucia E. H., Thomas R. B. 1998. Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominate and suppressed loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28 (8): 1116−1124.
• Nilsson U., Albrektson A. 1993. Productivity of needles and allocation of growth in young Scots pine trees of different competitive status. Forest Ecology and Management 62: 173−187.
• Oleksyn J., Reich P. B., Chałupka W., Tjoelker M. G. 1999. Differential Above− and Below−ground Biomass Accumulation of European Pinus sylvestris Populations in a 12−year−old. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14: 7−17.
• Poorter H., Niklas K. J., Reich P. B., Oleksyn J., Poot P., Mommer L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta−analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. The New Phytologist 193 (1): 30−50.
• Poorter, H., Sack, L., 2012. Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 3: 1−10.
• Sharma R. P. 2012. Modelling dry matter allocation within Alnus nepalensis D. Don trees in Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 4 (2): 47−53.
• Socha J., Wężyk P. 2007. Allometric equations for estimating the foliage biomass of Scots pine. European Journal of Forest Research 126 (2): 263−270.
• Vanninen P. 2004. Allocation of Above−ground Growth in Pinus sylvestris – Impacts of Tree Size and Competition. Silva Fennica 38 (2): 155−166.
• Vanninen P., Mäkelä A. 2000. Needle and stem wood production in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees of different age, size and competitive status. Tree Physiology 20 (8): 527−533.
• Xue L., Jacobs D. F., Zeng S., Yang Z., Guo S., Liu B. 2012. Relationship between above−ground biomass allocation and stand density index in Populus x euramericana stands. Forestry 85 (5): 611−619.
• Zasada M., Bronisz K., Bijak Sz., Wojtan R., Tomusiak R., Dudek A., Michalak K. 2008. Wzory empiryczne do określania suchej biomasy nadziemnej części drzew i ich komponentów. Sylwan 152 (3): 27−39.