Application of hydrodynamic simulation and frequency analysis for assessment of sediment deposition and vegetation impacts on floodplain inundation

• Autorzy: Dysarz T. , Wicher-Dysarz J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The problem analyzed in our paper is quantification of the impact of sediment deposition and riparian vegetation growth on floodplain inundation frequency. An additional factor is water reservoir operation. A Warta River reach was selected for the study. This natural channel is located above the Jeziorsko Reservoir. The applied methodology is a combination of data collection, hydrodynamic model simulations, and analysis of water stage frequencies. Computations and analyses showed interesting relations between elements of the river system studied. Floodplain inundation frequency was found permanently increasing. Although the main factor responsible for this is sediment deposition, the influence of riparian vegetation is important at higher water stages.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 20
• Numer: 6
• Opis fizyczny: p.1441-1551,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dysarz T.

• Department of Water and Sanitary Engineering, Poznań University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94A, 60-649 Poznań, Poland

autor

Wicher-Dysarz J.

• Department of Water and Sanitary Engineering, Poznań University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Piątkowska 94A, 60-649 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. KEELAND B.D., CONNER W.H., SHARITZ R.R. A comparison of wetland tree growth response to hydrologic regime in Louisiana and South Carolina. Forest Ecology and Management, 90, 237, 1997.
• 2. SURTEVANT B.R. A model of wetland vegetation dynamics in simulated beaver impoundments, Ecological Modeling, 112, 195, 1998.
• 3. STROMBERG J.C. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. Journal of Arid Environments, 49, 17, 2001.
• 4. NILSSON C., SVEDMARK M. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environmental Management, 30, (4), 468, 2002.
• 5. PETTS G.E., GURNELL A.M. Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphology, 71, 27, 2005.
• 6. MAINGI J.K., MARSH S.E. Quantifying hydrologic impacts following dam construction along the Tana River. Kenya. Journal of Arid Environments, 50, 53, 2002.
• 7. MAGILLIGAN F.J., NISLOW K.H. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology, 71, 61, 2005.
• 8. MARSTON R.A., MILLS J.D., WRAZIEN D.R., BASSETT B., SPLINTER D.K. Effects of Jackson Lake Dam on the Snake River and its floodplain, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA. Geomorphology, 71, 79, 2005.
• 9. MUMBA M., THOMPSON J.R. Hydrological and ecological impacts of dams on the Kafue Flats floodplain system, southern Zambia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30, 442, 2005.
• 10. PINTER N., HEINE R.A. Hydrodynamic and morphodynamic response to river engineering documented by fixeddischarge analysis, Lower Missouri River, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 302, 70, 2005.
• 11. KING S.L., ALLEN J.A., MCCOY J.W. Long-term effects of a lock and dam and green tree reservoir management on a bottomland hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 112, 213, 1998.
• 12. WELLMEYER J.L., SLATTERY M.C., PHILLIPS J.D. Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas. Geomorphology, 69, 1, 2005.
• 13. KITE G. Modelling the Mekong: Hydrological simulation for environmental impact studies. Journal of Hydrology, 253, 1, 2001.
• 14. WICHER-DYSARZ J., PRZEDWOJSKI B. Modeling of sediment accumulation in the inlet part of Jeziorsko reservoir, Annual Reviews of Agricultural University of Poznan, 26, 483, 2005.
• 15. KLOPSTRA D., BARNEVELD H.J., VAN NOORTWIJK J.M., VAN VELZEN E.H. Analytical model for hydraulic roughness of submerged vegetation. The 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, Proceedings of Theme A, Managing Water: Coping with Scarcity and Abundance, San Francisco, California, 1997.
• 16. WALCZAK N., PRZEDWOJSKI B. Determination of resistance coefficients for floodplains of the Warta river upstream of the Jeziosko reservoir, Annals of Agricultural University of Poznan, 2005 [In Polish].
• 17. BRUNNER G.W. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System hydraulic reference manual, computer program documentation. Davis, CA.: US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2002.
• 18. LIGGETT M.B., CUNGE J.A. Numerical methods of solution of the unsteady flow equations, in Mahmood and Yevjevich. In: MAHMOOD K., YEVJEVICH V. (Eds.). Unsteady flow in open channels. Fort Collins, Colorado: Water Resources Publications, 1975.
• 19. ABBOTT M.B. Computational Hydraulics, Elements of the Theory of Free Surface Flows. London: Pitman, 1979.
• 20. CUNGE J.A., HOLLY F.M.JR., VERVEJ A. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, 1988.
• 21. BARKAU R.L. Simulation of the July 1981 flood along Salt River, Report for CE695BV, Special Problems in Hydraulics. Fort Collins, CO.: Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, 1982.
• 22. ARMANINI A., RIGHETI M., GRISENTI P. Direct measurement of vegetation resistance in prototype scale. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 43, (5), 481, 2005.
• 23. CHOW V.T., MAIDMENT D.R., MAYS L.W. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill International Editions, Civil Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988.
• 24. SALTELLI A., RATTO M., ANDRES T., CAMPOLONGO F., CARIBONI J., GATELLI D., SAISANA M., TARANTOLA S. Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2008.
• 25. HALL J.W., BOYCE S.A., WANG Y., DAWSON R.J., TARANTOLA S., SALTELLI A. Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135, (11), 2009.
• 26. CHOW V.T. Open Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill College, 1959.