Metody dojrzewania mięsa wołowego w aspekcie bezpieczeństwa zdrowotnego

• Autorzy: Domaradzki P. , Florek M. , Litwinczuk Z.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Methods of beef ageing from the health safety standpoint

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Beef ageing is a technique used by meat technologists, retailers, and restaurateurs to intensify flavor and improve tenderness due to the natural enzymatic processes occurring in meat postmortem. There is a widespread consensus that meat should age to achieve desirable palatability and tenderness. However, taking into account obvious advantages and disadvantages it is questionable which technique of meat ageing is to be selected. The paper presents two techniques of beef ageing (dry and wet) and their effect on the final sensory quality of meat, weight losses, and microbiological status. On the one hand, dry ageing primarily augments the flavor of meat. On the other hand, wet ageing notably increases the meat tenderness. Unfortunately, dry ageing of unpacked beef (or beef cuts) is a process which requires specific temperatures, relative humidity, airflow, and high standards of hygienic conditions. In contrast, wet ageing of meat in a vacuum bag does not require such circumstances (with the exception of temperature). Moreover, wet ageing can further amplify the effect of dry ageing, thus creating an additional benefit. The main advantages of this combination are the constrained weight loss of beef and a substantial reduction in the risk of contamination. Although the dry beef ageing process is extremely time-consuming, requires particular attention and professional knowledge, it turns out that a narrow group of consumers is prepared to pay a premium for the properly manufactured final productthat stands out in terms of a unique taste profile. Furthermore, such a product is nutritious and completely safe from the health point of view (the lack of pathogenic microorganisms and mycotoxins as well as relatively low level of biogenic amines) when good hygienic and manufacturing practices (temperature, humidity, air-flow, careful treatment) are respected.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

mieso wolowe; jakosc; dojrzewanie miesa; metody; dojrzewanie na sucho; dojrzewanie na mokro; bezpieczenstwo zywnosci; bezpieczenstwo zdrowotne; stan mikrobiologiczny; zagrozenia zdrowia

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 75
• Numer: 09
• Opis fizyczny: s.521-527,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Domaradzki P.

• Katedra Towaroznawstwa i Przetwórstwa Surowców Zwierzęcych, Wydział Biologii, Nauk o Zwierzętach i Biogospodarki, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lubline, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Florek M.

• Katedra Towaroznawstwa i Przetwórstwa Surowców Zwierzęcych, Wydział Biologii, Nauk o Zwierzętach i Biogospodarki, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lubline, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Litwinczuk Z.

• Instytut Hodowli Zwierząt i Ochrony Bioróżnorodności, Wydział Biologii, Nauk o Zwierzętach i Biogospodarki, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

Bibliografia

• Abdullah A. Y., Qudsieh R. I.: Effect of slaughter weight and aging time on the quality of meat from Awassi ram lambs. Meat Sci. 2009, 82, 309-316.
• Ahnström M. L., Seyfert M., Hunt M. C., Johnson D. E.: Dry aging of beef in a bag highly permeable to water vapour. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 674-679.
• Bartholomä A., Schering B., Horn D.: Lebensmittelrechtliche Bewertung von “Dry Aged Beef”. Fleischwirt. 2013, 6, 104-109.
• Berger J., Kim Y. H. B., Legako J. F., Martini S., Lee J., Ebner P. E., Zuelly S. M. S.: Dry-aging improves meat quality attributes of grass-fed beef loins. Meat Sci. 2018, 145, 285-291.
• Brewer S., Novakofski J.: Consumer sensory evaluations of aging effects on beef quality. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 78-82.
• Campbell R. E., Hunt M. C., Levis P., Chambers E.: Dry-Aging Effects on Palatability of Beef Longissimus Muscle. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 196-199.
• DeGeer S. L., Hunt M. C., Bratcher C. L., Crozier-Dodson B. A., Johnson D. E., Stika J. F.: Effects of dry aging of bone-in and boneless strip loins using two aging processes for two aging times. Meat Sci. 2009, 83, 768-774.
• Dikeman M. E., Obuz E., Gök V., Akkaya L., Stroda S.: Effects of dry, vacuum, and special bag aging; USDA quality grade; and end-point temperature on yields and eating quality of beef Longissimus lumborum steaks. Meat Sci. 2013, 94, 228-233.
• Domaradzki P., Litwińczuk Z., Florek M., Litwińczuk A.: Zmiany właściwości fizykochemicznych i sensorycznych mięsa wołowego w zależności od warunków jego dojrzewania. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość. 2016, 3, 35-53.
• EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ): Scientific opinion on risk based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented food. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2393.
• Feiner G.: Meat products Handbook: Practical science and technology (1st ed.). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge 2006.
• Florek M., Domaradzki P., Litwińczuk Z.: Teorie dotyczące naturalnych procesów kruszenia mięsa po uboju. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość. 2016, 2, 34-48.
• Florek M., Junkuszew A., Bojar W., Skałecki P., Greguła-Kania M., Litwińczuk A., Gruszecki T. M.: Effect of vacuum ageing on instrumental and sensory textural properties of meat from Uhruska lambs. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 16, 601-609.
• Galletly J.: Dry Aged Beef – Design and Good Manufacturing Practices Review. Final report. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, North Sydney 2016, 1-38.
• Gowda T. K. G. M., De Zutter L., Van Royen G., Houf K., Van Damme I.: Evaluation of the microbiological quality of dry aged beef in Belgium. J. Food Process. Technol. 2016, 7, 11.
• Gudjónsdóttir M., Gacutan M. D., Mendes A. C., Chronakis I. S., Jespersen L., Karlsson A. H.: Effects of electrospun chitosan wrapping for dry-ageing of beef, as studied by microbiological, physicochemical and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. Food Chem. 2015, 184, 167-175.
• Huis in’t Veld J. H. J.: Microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods: An overview. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 33, 1-18.
• Hulánková R., Kameník J., Saláková A., Závodský D., Borilova G.: The effect of dry aging on instrumental, chemical and microbiological parameters of organic beef loin muscle. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 559-565.
• Ingham S. C., Buege D. R.: Validation of dry-aging as an effective intervention step against Escherichia coli O157:H7 on beef carcasses. A University of Wisconsin-Madison Research Report 2003.
• Juárez M., Caine W. R., Dugan M. E. R., Hidiroglou N., Larsen I. L., Uttaro B., Aalhus J. L.: Effects of dry-ageing on pork quality characteristics in different genotypes. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 117-121.
• Kim Y. H. B., Kemp R., Samuelsson L. M.: Effects of dry-aging on meat quality attributes and metabolite profiles of beef loins. Meat Sci. 2016, 111, 168-176.
• Kim Y. H. B., Ma D., Setyabrata D., Farouk M. M., Lonergan S. M., Huff-Lonergan E., Hunt M. C.: Understanding postmortem biochemical processes and post-harvest aging factors to develop novel smart-aging strategies Meat Sci. 2018, 144, 74-90.
• Laster M. A., Smith R. D., Nicholson K. L., Nicholson J. D. W., Miller R. K., Griffin D. B., Harris K. B., Savell J. W.: Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer sensory at-tribute evaluations of steaks from ribeyes, strip loins, and top sirloins from two quality grade groups. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 795-804.
• Lemenager R.: Amount of Freezer Beef Expected from a Carcass? Animal Sciences Department, Purdue University 2002, 1-2.
• Lepper-Blilie A. N., Berg E. P., Buchanan D. S., Berg P. T.: Effects of postmortem aging time and type of aging on palatability of low marbled beef loins. Meat Sci. 2016, 112, 63-68.
• Li X., Babol J., Bredie W. L. P., Nielsen B., Tománková J., Lundström K.: A comparative study of beef quality after ageing longissimus muscle using a dry ageing bag, traditional dry ageing or vacuum package ageing. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 433-442.
• Li X., Babol J., Wallby A., Lundström K.: Meat quality, microbiological status and consumer preference of beef gluteus medius aged in a dry ageing bag or vacuum. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 229-234.
• Ludwiczak A., Stanisz M., Bykowska M., Składanowska J., Ślósarz P.: Effect of storage on quality traits of the semimembranosus muscle of farmed fallow deer (Dama dama) bucks and does. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 1149-1155.
• Lyford C., Thompson J., Polkinghorne R., Miller M., Nishimura T., Neath K., Allen P., Belasco E.: Is willingness to pay (WTP) for beef quality grades affected by consumer demographics and meat consumption preferences? Australas. Agribus. Rev. 2010, 18, 1-17.
• Miller R. K.: Beef flavor: A white paper. National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Centennial 2001.
• Novakofski J., Brewer M. S.: The paradox of toughening during the aging of tender steaks. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, 473-479.
• Olivier S.: Assessment of the mycological hazards associated with the dry ageing of red meat. Final report. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, North Sydney 2018, 1-11.
• Parrish F. C., Boles J. A., Rust R. E., Olson D. G.: Dry and wet aging effects on palatability attributes of beef loin and rib steaks from three quality grades. Journal of Food Science 1991, 56, 601-603.
• Perry N.: Dry aging beef. Inter. J. Gastronomy and Food Sci. 2012, 1, 78-80.
• Piaskowska N., Daszkiewicz T., Kubiak D., Zapotoczny P: Quality of meat (Longissimus dorsi) from male fallow deer (Dama dama L.) packaged and stored under vacuum and modified atmosphere conditions. Asian. Austral. J. Anim. 2016, 29, 1782-1789.
• Polkinghorne R. J., Thompson J. M.: Meat standards and grading: a world view. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 227-235.
• Polkinghorne R., Thompson J. M., Watson R., Gee A., Porter M.: Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system. Austral. J. Experim. Agric. 2008, 48, 1351-1359.
• Ryu S., Park M. R., Maburutse B. E., Lee W. J., Park D.-J., Cho S., Hwang I., Oh S., Kim Y.: Diversity and characteristics of the meat microbiological community on dry aged beef. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 28, 105-108.
• Savell J.: Dry-aging of beef: Executive Summary. Texas, Estados Unidos: Center for Research and Knowledge Management. National Cattlemen’s Beef Association. Centennial 2008, p. 1-12.
• Sitz B. M., Calkins C. R., Feuz D. M., Umberger W. J., Eskridge K. M.: Consumer sensory acceptance and value of wet-aged and dry-aged beef steaks. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 1221-1226.
• Smith A. M., Harris K. B., Griffin D. B., Miller R. K., Kerth C. R., Savell J. W.: Retail yields and palatability evaluations of individual muscles from wet-aged and dry-aged beef ribeyes and top sirloin butts that were merchandised innovatively. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 21-26.
• Smith R., Nicholson K., Nicholson J., Harris K., Miller R., Griffin D., Savell J.: Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US Choice and US Select short loins. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 631-639.
• Stenström H., Li X., Hunt M. C., Lundström K.: Consumer preference and effect of correct or misleading information after ageing beef longissimus muscle using vacuum, dry ageing, or a dry ageing bag. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 661-666.
• Verbeke W., Van Wezemael L., de Barcellos M. D., Kugler J. O., Hocquette J. F., Ueland O., Grunert K. G.: European beef consumers’ interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite 2010, 54, 289-296.
• Warren K. E., Kastner C. L.: A comparison of dry-aged and vacuum-aged beef strip loins. J. Muscle Foods 1992, 3, 151-157.
• Whetstone S., Adhikari K., Chamber IV E.: Impact of Seasoning and Bromelain on Sensory Attributes of Beef Steaks. J. Hum. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 2, 1023.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21521/mw.6257