PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 07 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Contradictions in development: growth and crisis in Indian economy

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Sprzeczności w kontekście rozwoju: wzrost i kryzys w indyjskiej gospodarce

Języki publikacji

EN PL

Abstrakty

EN
Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 5% in the 1980s to around 10% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to less than half that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of the reform measures on economic growth and poverty. Because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. It seems that India’s growth has been led by the services sector, which includes real estates, IT, telecommunications, and banking, which contributes nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of the India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.
PL
Od czasu gdy rozpoczęto reformy pro-rynkowe, indyjska gospodarka odnotowała wzrost od 5% w latach 80-tych XX wieku do 10% w 2011 roku, po czym gwałtownie zwolniła do poniżej połowy tego tempa w ostatnich latach. Od rozpoczęcia reform aż do 2011 roku, widoczne były wyraźne i imponujące oznaki podążania Indii w kierunku wysokiego wzrostu i podniesienia poziomu życia mieszkańców tego państwa. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przeanalizowanie możliwych skutków i wpływu działań reformacyjnych na wzrost gospodarczy i ubóstwo. Najbardziej popularne podejście sugeruje, że można oczekiwać, iż reformy zwiększą wzrost gospodarczy i dochody. Wydaje się, że wzrost Indii był prowadzony przez sektor usług, który obejmuje telekomunikację, bankowość, IT oraz nieruchomości i który stanowił prawie 50% PKB w 2012 roku. Produkcja, która doświadczyła niezwykłego wzrostu i transformacji w gospodarkach Wschodniej Azji, wykazała znacznie niższy wzrost. Sektor rolnictwa, który cały czas zatrudnia prawie 2/3 siły roboczej Indii pozostaje w stagnacji. Niniejsze badanie sugeruje, że edukacja i służba zdrowia były zaniedbywane w Indiach i to zaszkodzi wzrostowi oraz produktywności.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

07

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.82-98,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • International Economics at the University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield - HD1 3DH, United Kingdom

Bibliografia

  • 1. Ahluwalia, Montek S. (2011), “Prospects and Policy Challenges in the 12th Plan” Economic and Political Weekly, 46 (21), pp. 88-105.
  • 2. Ahluwalia, Montek S. (2002), “Economic Reforms in India since 1991: Has gradualism worked?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3), pp.67-88.
  • 3. Ash, Garton Timothy (2013), “Come on, India! Show us that freedom can outdo tyranny”, The Guardian, 13th January, London.
  • 4. Bagchi, A. K. (2000), “The past and the Future of the Development State”, Journal of World-Systems Research, Vol. 2, pp. 398-442.
  • 5. Bhagwati J., Panagariya A. (2013), Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth Reduced Poverty, New York: Public Affairs.
  • 6. Bhagwati J. (Ed.) (2013), India in Transition: Freeing the Economy, New York: Clarendon Press.
  • 7. Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P. (2013), “The stunted structural transformation of the Indian economy”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 29, pp 5-13.
  • 8. Brown Michael Barratt (1993), Fair Trade, London: Zed Books.
  • 9. Byres Terry (1994), “The State and Development” in Terry Byres (Edi) The State and Development Planning in India, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10. Das D.K. (2011), “Indian economy: growth performance and prospects of transitioning growth trajectory”, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 12, pp. 171-193, Rutledge.
  • 11. Deaton A., Dreze J. (2009), “Food and nutrition in India: facts and interpretations”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.44, No.7, pp. 42-65.
  • 12. Dreze J., Sen Amartya (2013), An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions, Princeton University Press.
  • 13. Dutt A.K., Rao Mohan (1996), “Growth, distribution and the environment: sustainable development in India”, World Development, 24, No.2, pp.287-300.
  • 14. Economic Survey. (Various annual issues), New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Finance. (www.indiastats.com).
  • 15. Forbes (2012), “The World’s billionaires”, accessed on 14th December 2013. http://www.forbes.com/bioolionaires/list/.
  • 16. Girdner Eddie J., Siddiqui K. (2008), “Neoliberal Globalization, Poverty Creation and Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries”, with International Journal of Environment and Development (IJED), Jan.-June, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 1-27.
  • 17. Ghose A. K. (2013), “Ballooning Current Account Deficit: What Options?”, Economic and Political Weekly, 24th August, Vol. XLVIII, No.34, Mumbai.
  • 18. Kalecki M. (1976), Essays in Developing Economies, Hassocks: Harvester Press.
  • 19. Kohli A. (2012), “State and Redistributive Development in India” in Nagaraj, N. (Edi.) Growth, Inequality and Social Development in India, UNRISD, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 20. Mishra P. (2013), “Agriculture vs non-agriculture”, Economic and Political Weekly, April 13, vol. xlviii, No.15.
  • 21. Mohanty B.B. (2013), “Farmers Suicide in India: Durkheim’s Types”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.48, (21) May 25: Mumbai.
  • 22. Planning Commission (2008), Eleventh Five Year Plan, 3 vols, Planning Commission, New Delhi: Government of India.
  • 23. Prebisch R., (1950), The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principle Problems, New York: United Nations.
  • 24. Rodrik D., Subramanian A. (2004), Why India Can Grow at 7 Per cent a Year or More? Working Paper No. WP/04/118, Washington D.C.: IMF.
  • 25. Siddiqui K. (2014), “Flows of Foreign Capital into Developing Countries: A Critical Review”, Journal of International Business and Economics, Vol.2 (1), March, pp.29-46.
  • 26. Siddiqui K. (2012), “Developing Countries Experience with Neoliberalism & Globalisation”, Research in Applied Economics, Vol.4, No.4, Dec. pp. 12-37.
  • 27. Siddiqui K. (2011),. “Experiences of Capitalism in India and Pakistan’, Research in Applied Economics, June, Vol.3, No.1, pp.1-48.
  • 28. Siddiqui K. (2010), “Globalisation and Neo-liberal Economic Reforms in India: A Critical Review”, S. K. Pramanick & R. Ganguly, Eds. Globalization in India: New Frontiers and Emerging Challenges, pp. 219-243, New Delhi: Prentice Hall.
  • 29. Siddiqui K. (2009), “The Political Economy of Growth in China and India”, Journal of Asian Public Policy (JAPP), March, Vol.1, No.2, pp.17-35, ISSN 1751-6234.
  • 30. Siddiqui K. (1999a), “New Technology and Process of Differentiation: Two Sugarcane Cultivating Villages in UP, India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 25th December, Vol. XXXIV (52), pp. A39-A53, Mumbai.
  • 31. Siddiqui K. (1999b), “Credit and Marketing of Sugarcane: A field study of two villages in Western UP”, Social Scientist, Vol.25 (1-2), Jan., pp. 62-93, New Delhi.
  • 32. Siddiqui K. (1996), “Growth of Modern Industries under Colonial Regime: Industrial Development in British India between 1900 and 1946”, Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, Vol. XVII (1), January, pp. 11-59.
  • 33. Siddiqui K. (1990), “Historical Roots of Mass Poverty in India”, in C.A. Thayer et al. (Eds.) Trends and Strains, PPH, New Delhi, pp. 59-76.
  • 34. Sephenson W. (2013), “Indian Farmers and Suicide: How big the problem?”, BBC new magazine, http:www.bbc.co.uk/news/magizine-21077458 accessed on 15th May 2014.
  • 35. Stiglitz J. (1996), Some lessons from the East Asian miracle, The World Bank Research Observer; Aug; pp.151-171, Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 36. Storm S. (2001), The desirable form of openness for Indian agriculture, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 185-207.
  • 37. The Economist (2014) “Fighting corruption in India: A bad boom”, 15th March, London.
  • 38. Vasavi A.R. (2012), Shadow Spaces: Suicides and the Predicament of Rural India, New Delhi: Collective.
  • 39. World Bank (2008), World Development Indicators, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 40. World Bank (1996), India–Five Years of Stabilization and Reform and Challenges Ahead, Washington DC: World Bank.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-be3d7829-8841-4ac8-acde-a57112851c3c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.