Air-dry and water-stable soil aggregate distribution of Polish chernozems classified in various complexes of agricultural suitability

• Autorzy: Paluszek J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this study was quality estimation of air-dry and water-stable soil aggregate distribution in Polish Haplic Chernozems developed from loess. It was found that among the Chernozems classified in the particular complexes of agricultural suitability there were small differences in the content of air-dry aggregates with sizes of 0.25-10 mm. The distribution of air-dry aggregates in horizons Ap, A, and ABw was estimated as good or medium, while that in horizons Bw and Ck as medium or poor. In the Chernozems classified in the very good wheat complex and the good wheat complex the content of water-stable aggregates with sizes of 0.25-10 mm was significantly greater than in soils classified in the deficient wheat complex. The water-stable aggregate distribution in the Ap horizons of soils classified in the very good and good wheat complexes was estimated as good, and in the Ap horizons of soils of the deficient wheat complex as medium. In horizons A the distribution of water stable aggregates was assessed as medium, and in horizons ABw, Bw, and Ck as poor or very poor.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

air-dry aggregate; water-stable aggregate; soil aggregate; distribution; Poland; black earth; agricultural suitability; size distribution

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.813-821,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Paluszek J.

• Institute of Soil Science, Environmental Engineering, and Management, University of Life Science in Lublin, S.Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. CHENDEV Y.G., IVANOV I.V., PESOCHINA L.S. Trends of the natural evolution of Chernozems on the East European Plain. Eurasian Soil Sci+. 43, (7), 728, 2010.
• 2. LISETSKII F.N., GOLEUSOV P.V., CHEPELEV O.A. The development of Chernozems on the Dniester-Prut interfluve in the Holocene. Eurasian Soil Sci+. 46, (5), 491, 2013.
• 3. ALTERMANN M., RINKLEBE J., MERBACH I., KÖRSCHENS M., LANGER U., HOFMANN B. Chernozem – soil of the year 2005. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc. 168, 725, 2005.
• 4. ECKMEIER E., GERLACH R., GEHRT E., SCHMIDT M.W.I. Pedogenesis of Chernozems in Central Europe – A review. Geoderma 139, 288, 2007.
• 5. LORZ C., SAILE T. Anthropogenic pedogenesis of Chernozems in Germany? – a critical review. Quatern. Int. 243, 273, 2011.
• 6. PTG. Polish soil classification. 5 Edition. Rocz. Glebozn. 62, (3), pp. 1-193, 2011 [In Polish].
• 7. SMETANOVA A., ŠABO M. Bright patches in Chernozems areas on loess – an evidence of soil erosion and relief changes. Pr. Stud. Geogr. 45, 143, 2010.
• 8. ZÁDOROVÁ T., JAKŠÍK O., KODEŠOVÁ R., PENÍŽEK V. Influence of terrain attributes and soil properties on soil aggregate stability. Soil Water Res. 6, (3), 111, 2011.
• 9. OFFICIAL TABLE OF SOIL CLASSES. Appendix to the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 12th September, 2012, on the soil-science classification of soils. Dz. U. RP of 14th November, 2012, item 1246, pp. 4-269, 2012 [In Polish].
• 10. PAGLIAI M., VIGNOZZI N., PELLEGRINI S. Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil Till. Res. 79, 131, 2004.
• 11. BRONICK C.J., LAL R. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124, 3, 2005.
• 12. PRANAGAL J. The physical state of selected silty soils of on the Lublin Region. Rozpr. Nauk. Uniw. Przyr. w Lublinie 353, pp. 1-129, 2011 [In Polish].
• 13. ĆIRIĆ V., MANOJLOVIĆ M., NEŠIĆ L., BELIĆ M. Soil dry aggregate size distribution: effects of soil type and land use. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12, (4), 689, 2012.
• 14. KONDRACKI J. Regional geography of Poland. 3 Edition. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa, pp. 1-444, 2011 [In Polish].
• 15. PENNOCK D., YATES T., BRAIDEK J. Soil sampling designs. In: Carter M.R., Gregorich E.G. (Eds.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1-14, 2008.
• 16. LARNEY F.J. Dry-aggregate size distribution. In: Carter M.R., Gregorich E.G. (Eds.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Second Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 821-831, 2008.
• 17. NIMMO J.R., PERKINS K.S. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Dane J.H., Topp G.C. (Eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4 – Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 317-328, 2002.
• 18. KHAN K.Y., POZDNYAKOV A.I., SON B.K. Structure and stability of soil aggregates. Eurasian Soil Sci. 40, (4), 409, 2007.
• 19. TOBIAŠOVÁ E., MIŠKOLCZI J. Humus substances and soil structure. Rocz. Glebozn. 63, (3), 31, 2012.
• 20. RZĄSA S., OWCZARZAK W. Structure of mineral soils. Wyd. AR w Poznaniu, Poznań, pp. 1-394, 2004 [In Polish].
• 21. GUIMARÄES R.M.L., BALL B.C., TORMENA C.A. Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use Manage. 27, 395, 2011.
• 22. KUZNETSOVA I.V. Changes in the physical status of the typical and leached Chernozems of Kursk Oblast within 40 years. Eurasian Soil Sci+. 46, (4), 393, 2013.
• 23. GUBER A.K., RAWLS W.J., SHEIN E.V., PACHEPSKY Y.A. Effect of soil aggregate size distribution on water retention. Soil Sci. 168, 223, 2003.
• 24. LIPIEC J., WALCZAK R., WITKOWSKA-WALCZAK B., NOSALEWICZ A., SŁOWIŃSKA-JURKIEWICZ A., SŁAWIŃSKI C. The effect of aggregate size on water retention and pore structure of two silt loam soils of different genesis. Soil Till. Res. 97, 239, 2007.
• 25. SŁAWIŃSKI C., WITKOWSKA-WALCZAK B., LIPIEC J., NOSALEWICZ A. Effect of aggregate size on water movement in soils. Int. Agrophys. 25, 53, 2011.
• 26. PALUSZEK J. Comparison of aggregation and aggregate water stability in Luvisols, Phaeozems and Fluvisols. Rocz. Glebozn. 55, (1), 181, 2004 [In Polish].
• 27. PALUSZEK J. Evaluation of the soil structure of Luvisols and Pheozems developed from silts. Rocz. Glebozn. 62, (1), 117, 2011 [In Polish].
• 28. PALUSZEK J. Criteria of evaluation of soil physical quality of polish arable soils. Acta Agrophys., Rozpr. i Monogr. 191, pp. 1-139, 2011 [In Polish].
• 29. LENART S. The influence of soil management and cultivation technology on soil crumb structure. Ochr. Środ. Zasob. Natur. 35/36, 173, 2008 [In Polish].
• 30. PALUSZEK J. The quality of structure and water-air properties of eroded Haplic Luvisol treated with gel-forming polymer. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 19, 1287, 2010.
• 31. BALASHOV E., BUCHKINA N. Impact of short- and longterm agricultural use of chernozem on its quality indicators. Int. Agrophys. 25, 1, 2011.
• 32. SUWARA I., SZULC W. The effect of long-term fertilization on the soil structure. Nawozy i Nawoż. 42, 20, 2011.
• 33. BRYK M., SŁOWIŃSKA-JURKIEWICZ A., MEDVEDEV V.V. Morphometrical structure evaluation of long-term manured Ukrainian chernozem. Int. Agrophys. 26, 117, 2012.
• 34. SŁOWIŃSKA-JURKIEWICZ A., BRYK M., MEDVEDEV V.V. Long-term organic fertilization effect on chernozem structure. Int. Agrophys. 27, 81, 2013.
• 35. ANNABI M., LE BISSONNAIS Y., LE VILLIO-POITRENAUD M., HOUOT S. Improvement of soil aggregate stability by repeated applications of organic amendments to a cultivated silty loam soil. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 144, 382, 2011.