Zastosowanie drzew klasyfikacji do określenia preferencji środowiskowych gatunków na przykładzie głuszca (Tetrao urogallus)

• Autorzy: Bolibok L. , Brzeziecki B. , Drozdowski S. , Zawadzka D. , Zawadzki J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Application of classification trees for assessment species habitat preferences on the example of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus)

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Habitat preferences of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in the Augustowska Forest (NE Poland) were evaluated using classification trees. Data were collected on 1033 circular sampling plots localized on leks and in their vicinity with 1 km radius. Gathered information described tree stands (site conditions, age, species com− position, tree density, closure, vertical structure, lower strata coverage (saplings and shrubs) and blueberry coverage (Vaccinium myrtillus) as well signs of capercaillie presence. The analysis shows that for capercaillie of key importance are tree stands growing on fresh or wet coniferous sites, more than 100 years old, with density less than 446 trees/ha, with anthill and situated more than 150 from a road.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; lowiectwo; ptaki lowne; gatunki chronione; gluszec; Tetrao urogallus; preferencje srodowiskowe; metody analizy; drzewo klasyfikacyjne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 158
• Numer: 04
• Opis fizyczny: s.267-276,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bolibok L.

• Katedra Hodowli Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa

autor

Brzeziecki B.

• Katedra Hodowli Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa

autor

Drozdowski S.

• Katedra Hodowli Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa

autor

Zawadzka D.

• Instytut Nauk Leśnych, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Filia w Tomaszowie, ul.Konstytucji 3 Maja 65, 97-200 Tomaszów Mazowiecki

autor

Zawadzki J.

• Regionalna Dyrekcja Lasów Państwowych w Radomiu, ul.25 Czerwca 68, 26-600 Radom

Bibliografia

• Angelstam P. 2004. Habitat Thresholds and Effects of Forest Landscape Change on the Distribution and Abundance of Black Grouse and Capercaillie. Ecological Bulletins 1: 173−187.
• Bell J. F. 1996. Application of classification trees to the habitat preference of upland birds. Journal of Applied Statistics 23: 349−360.
• Bollmann K., Weibel P., Graf R. F. 2005. An analysis of central Alpine capercaillie spring habitat at the forest stand scale. Forest Ecology and Management 215: 307−318.
• Breiman L., Friedman J. H., Olshen R. A., Stone C. J. 1999. Classification and Regression Trees. CRC Press, New York.
• Brzeziecki B., Drozdowski S., Zawadzka D., Zawadzki J. 2012. Quantification of ecological preferences of the capercaillie Tetrao urogallus by means of the Habiatat Suitability Index: A case study in the Augustów Forest (NE Poland). Polish Journal of Ecology 60: 805−814.
• Díaz L. 2006. Influences of forest type and forest structure on bird communities in oak and pine woodlands in Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 223: 54−65.
• Gjerde I. 1991a. Cues in Winter Habitat Selection by Capercaillie. I. Habitat Characteristics. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 197−204.
• Gjerde I. 1991b. Cues in Winter Habitat Selection by Capercaillie. II. Experimental Evidence. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 205−212.
• Gjerde I., Wegge P. 1989. Spacing Pattern, Habitat Use and Survival of Capercaillie in a Fragmented Winter Habitat. Ornis Scandinavica 20: 219−225.
• Graf R. F., Bollmann K., Suter W., Bugmann H. 2005. The Importance of Spatial Scale in Habitat Models: Capercaillie in the Swiss Alps. Landscape Ecol 20: 703−717.
• Huettmann F., Diamond A. W. 2001. Seabird colony locations and environmental determination of seabird distribution: a spatially explicit breeding seabird model for the Northwest Atlantic. Ecological Modelling 141: 261−298.
• Klaus S., Andreev A. V., Bergmann H. H., Müller F., Porkert J., Wiesner J. 1989. Die Auerhuehner: Tetrao urogallus und T. urogalloides. Ziemsen, Wittenberg Lutherstadt.
• Kondracki J. 1994. Geografia Polski. Mezoregiony fizyczno−geograficzne. PWN, Warszawa.
• Kuczyński L., Chylarecki P. 2012. Atlas pospolitych ptaków lęgowych Polski: rozmieszczenie, wybiórczość siedliskowa, trendy. Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska. Warszawa.
• Low M., Joy M. K., Makan T. 2006. Using regression trees to predict patterns of male provisioning in the stitchbird (hihi). Animal Behaviour 71: 1057−1068.
• North M. P., Franklin J. F., Carey A. B., Forsman E. D., Hamer T. 1999. Forest stand structure of the northern spotted owl’s foraging habitat. Forest Science 45: 520−527.
• Olivier F., Wotherspoon S. J. 2006. Modelling habitat selection using presence−only data: Case study of a colonial hollow nesting bird, the snow petrel. Ecological Modelling 195: 187−204.
• Palomino D., Carrascal L. M. 2005. Birds on novel island environments. A case study with the urban avifauna of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecological Research 20: 611−617.
• Quevedo M., Bańuelos M. J., Sáez O., Obeso J. R. 2006. Habitat selection by Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus at the edge of the species’ distribution. Wildlife Biology 12: 267−276.
• R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
• Rolstad J., Wegge P. 1987. Distribution and size of capercaillie leks in relation to old forest fragmentation. Oecologia 72: 389−394.
• Saniga M. 1996. Habitat characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks in central Slovakia. Biologia, Bratislava 51: 191−199.
• Saniga M. 2003. Ecology of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and forest management in relation to its protection in the West Carpathians. Journal of Forest Science 49: 229−239.
• Schroth K.−E. 1991. Survival, Movements, and Habitat Selection of Released Capercaillie in the North−East Black Forest in 1984−1989. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 249−254.
• Sirkiä S., Lindén A., Helle P., Nikula A., Knape J., Lindén H. 2010. Are the declining trends in forest grouse populations due to changes in the forest age structure? A case study of Capercaillie in Finland. Biological Conservation 143: 1540−1548.
• Storch I. 1993. Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: Is bilberry important? Oecologia 95: 257−265.
• Storch I. 2000. Grouse: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000−2004. IUCN, Cambridge.
• Storch I. 2001. Capercaillie. W: BWP Update: The Journal of Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 1−24.
• Storch I. 2002. On spatial resolution in habitat models: can small−scale forest structure explain Capercaillie numbers? Conservation Ecology 6: 6.
• Storch I. 2007. Grouse: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2006−2010. IUCN and Fordingbridge, Gland, Switzerland, World Pheasant Assoc., UK. 114.
• Summers R. W., McFarlane J., Pearce−Higgins J. W. 2007. Measuring Avoidance by Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus of Woodland Close to Tracks. Wildlife Biology 13: 19−27.
• Therneau T. M., Atkinson E. J. 1997. An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning using the rpart Routines. Department of Health Sciences Research Technical Report Series 66: 1−52.
• Wegge P., Rolstad J. 2011. Clearcutting forestry and Eurasian boreal forest grouse: Long−term monitoring of sympatric capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and black grouse T. tetrix reveals unexpected effects on their population performances. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 1520−1529.
• Zawadzka D., Zawadzki J. 2008. Dynamika populacji głuszca w Puszczy Augustowskiej w latach 1911−2005. W: Ochrona kuraków leśnych. I Międzynarodowa Konferencja Ochrona Kuraków Leśnych, CILP, Janów Lubelski, 16−18 października 2007. 25−34.
• Zawadzki J., Sudnik W., Zawadzka D. 1999. Zmiany rozmieszczenia i liczebności głuszca Tetrao urogallus L. w Puszczy Augustowskiej oraz propozycje aktywnej ochrony gatunku. Sylwan 143 (11): 69−78.
• Zawadzki J., Zawadzka D. 2012. Population decline of Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus in the Augustów Forest (NE Poland). Acta Ornithologica 47: 199−204.