Land use structure as the basis for indicators determining spatial development of the environment

• Autorzy: Gasiorowski J. , Polawski Z. F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The transfer of urban spatial forms out of its center, as well as the uncontrolled expansion of large cities and urban sprawl have become a significant problem. These processes, especially when they occur in environmentally sensitive areas, may cause serious problems. The aim of this research was to propose – on the basis of land use structure – indicators that will quantitatively determine the characteristics of development of areas around large cities. Such indicators can be helpful in identifying issues and problems in spatial development of the environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

land use structure; indicator; determination; spatial development; environment; urban sprawl

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.955-960,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gasiorowski J.

• Institute of Geodesy and Cartography, Modzelewskiego 27, 02-679 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Polawski Z. F.

• Institute of Geodesy and Cartography, Modzelewskiego 27, 02-679 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. NECHYBA T. J., WALSH R. P. Urban Sprawl. J. Econ. Perspect. 18, (4), 177, 2004.
• 2. GUTRY-KORYCKA M. Urban Sprawl. Warsaw Agglomeration case study; Warsaw University: Warsaw, 2007.
• 3. MARKOWSKI T., MARSZAŁ T. Metropolises. Metropolital areas. Metropolization; Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, Polish Academy of Sciences: Warsaw, pp. 10-25, 2006 [In Polish].
• 4. BRUECKNER J. K. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. Int. Regional Sci. Rev. 23, (2), 160, 2000.
• 5. YEH A. G. O., LI X. Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 67, (1), 83, 2001.
• 6. EPSTEIN J., PAYNE K., E. KRAMER E. Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 63, (9), 913, 2002.
• 7. YANG X., LO C. P. Modelling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 17, (5), 463, 2003.
• 8. IRWIN E. G., BOCKSTAEL N. E. Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 34, (6), 705, 2004.
• 9. SUDHIRA H. S., RAMACHANDRA T. V., JAGADISH K. S. Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 5, (1), 29, 2004.
• 10. JAT M. K., GARG P. K., KHARE D. Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 10, (1), 26, 2008.
• 11. HAYEK U. W., JAEGER J. A. G., SCHWICK C., JARNE A., SCHULER M. Measuring and Assessing Urban Sprawl: What are the Remaining Options for Future Settlement Development in Switzerland for 2030? Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. 4, (4), 249, 2011.
• 12. MARTELLOZZO F., CLARKE K. C. Measuring urban sprawl, coalescence, and dispersal: a case study of Pordenone, Italy. Environ. Plann. B. 38, (6), 1085, 2011.
• 13. NOLE G., DANESE M., MURGANTE B., LASAPONARA R., LANORTE A. Using Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques and Multi-temporal Satellite Data for Analyzing Urban Sprawl. Computational Science And Its Applications – ICCSA 2012, PT III. 7335, 512, 2012.
• 14. SOHN J., CHOI S., LEWIS R., KNAAP G. Characterising urban sprawl on a local scale with accessibility measures. Geogr. J. 178, 230, 2012.
• 15. LV Z-Q., DAI F-Q., SUN C. Evaluation of urban sprawl and urban landscape pattern in a rapidly developing region. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, (10), 6437, 2012.
• 16. FENG L., LI H. Spatial Pattern Analysis of Urban Sprawl: Case Study of Jiangning, Nanjing, China. J. Urban Plan. D.- ASCE. 138, (3), 263, 2012.
• 17. CHEN Y-M., LI X., LIU X-P., AI B. Modeling urban landuse dynamics in a fast developing city using the modified logistic cellular automaton with a patch-based simulation strategy. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 28, (2), 234, 2014.
• 18. LIU H., WENG Q-H. Landscape metrics for analysing urbanization-induced land use and land cover changes. Geocarto Int. 28, (7), 582, 2013.
• 19. KOZŁOWSKI S. Spontaneous urban sprawl; Economics and Environment: Białystok, 2006 [In Polish].
• 20. LISOWSKI A., GROCHOWSKI M. Suburbanisation processes. Conditions, forms and consequences; Ministry of Regional Development: Warsaw, 2007 [In Polish].
• 21. GROSS G. On the Parametrization of Urban Land Use in Mesoscale Models. Bound-Lay-Meteor. 150, (2), 319, 2014.
• 22. WEILAND U., KINDLER A., BANZHAF E., EBERT A., REYES-PAECKE S. Indicators for sustainable land use management in Santiago de Chile. Ecol. Indic. 11, (5), 1074, 2011.
• 23. OSZWALD J., GOND V., DOLEDEC S., LAVELLE P. Identification of land-use indicators to assess changes in landscape mosaics. Bois. For. Trop. 307, 7, 2011.
• 24. MATTILA T., HELIN T., ANTIKAINEN R. Land use indicators in life cycle assessment A case study on beer production. Int. J. Life Cycle. Ass. 17, (3), 277, 2012.
• 25. OPRSAL Z., SARAPATKA B., KLADIVO P. Land-use changes and their relationships to selected landscape parameters in three cadastral areas in Moravia (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports. 21, (1), 41, 2013.
• 26. EASTGATE C. J., MORRISON D. A. Identifying Specific Indicators of Land Use Incompatibilities. Military Operations Research. 14, (1), 7, 2009.
• 27. Warsaw Metropolitan Area; Statistical Office in Warszawa, Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego w Warszawie: Warsaw, 2008 [In Polish].
• 28. Statistical Handbook for Local Government; Statistical Office in Warszawa: Warsaw, 2010 [In Polish].
• 29. CLC-2006 Technical guidelines, EEA Technical report No. 17/2007; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, 2007.
• 30. GALSTER G, HANSON R., RATCLIFFE M. R., WOLMAN H., COLEMAN S., FREIHAGE J. Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept. Hous. Policy Debate 12, (4), 681, 2001.
• 31. BROOS M. Analyzing Sprawl land Loss of Farmland in Pennsylvania at a Local Level. Paper on GIS for Local Government Conference, Pennsylvania, 2004.
• 32. TORRENS P. M. A Toolkit for Measuring Sprawl. Appl. Spatial Analysis 1, 5, 2008.