PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2020 | 164 | 01 |

Tytuł artykułu

Wzorce czasowe kolizji łosi z pociągami na terenie Kolumbii Brytyjskiej i ich wpływ na metody zapobiegające takim zdarzeniom

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

EN
Temporal patterns of moose-train collisions in British Columbia – implications for mitigation

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Where train tracks bisect moose habitat, trains may collide with moose, impacting the local population and creating a safety concern for rail traffic. Understanding the patterns underlying these collisions, is critical for helping managers choose the right mitigation methods to reduce mortality on railways. Our objective was to analyze the long−term temporal patterns of moose−train collisions. We used data on moose−train collisions from British Columbia (Canada) obtained from Canadian National Railways and British Columbia Rail Corporation. We analysed data from collision events that occurred between 1990 and 2010, excluding 1995−1996 for which there were no data. A total number of days, when moose−train collisions occurred (LD), and a total number of moose killed from collisions (LK) were calculated in annual, seasonal and monthly resolutions. We also investigated distribution of these data for day of the week. We used chi² and Mann−Kendall tests to investigate whether LD or LK changed over time and Pearson correlation coefficient to relate these trends to the annual moose harvest in the analysed period. The number of days in which moose−train collisions occurred varied by year and by time of year. LD occurred most often in winter and least often in summer, with the highest number being recorded in February and the lowest in July. There were no significant differences in the number of moose−train collisions on various days of the week. We found no significant trends in LD for seasons, months (except for November) and weekdays for the period under investigation. In general, LK revealed a temporal pattern as LD, however number of killed moose was significantly lower on Fridays and Saturdays comparing to other week days. Because moose−train collision patterns did not change significantly between years, we assume that the temporal patterns exhibited in our study likely hold true from year to year and can be used to inform managers considering mitigation measures aimed at reducing moose−train collisions.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

164

Numer

01

Opis fizyczny

s.32-40,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

  • Samodzielny Zakład Zoologii Leśnej i Łowiectwa, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa
autor
  • Zakład Dendrometrii i Produkcyjności Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa
autor
  • 6372 Cornell Place, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 2N7
autor
  • Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia; 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada V2N 4Z9

Bibliografia

  • Andersen R., Wiseth B., Pedersen P., Jaren V. 1991. Moose-train collisions: effects of environmental conditions. Alces 27: 79-84.
  • Babińska-Werka J., Krauze-Gryz D., Wasilewski M., Jasińska K. 2015. Effectiveness of an acoustic wildlife warning device using natural calls to reduce the risk of train collisions with animals. Transportation Research. Part D: Transport and Environment 38: 6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.021.
  • Bartonička T., Andrášik R., Duľa M., Sedoník J., Bíl M. 2018. Identification of local factors causing clustering of animal-vehicle collisions. Journal of Wildlife Management 82 (5): 940-947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21467.
  • Belant J. 1995. Moose collisions with vehicles and trains in Northwestern Minnesota. Alces 27: 31-45.
  • Bolger D. T., Newmark W. D., Morrison T. A., Doak D. F. 2008. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecology Letters 11: 63-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01109.x.
  • Cederlund G. 1989. Activity patterns in moose and roe deer in a north boreal forest. Ecography 12 (1): 39-45.
  • Child K. N. 1983. Railways and moose in the central interior of British Columbia: a recurrent management problem. Alces 19: 118-135.
  • Child K. N., Barry S. P., Aitken D. A. 1991. Moose mortality on highways and railways in British Columbia. Alces 27: 41-49.
  • Child K. N., Stuart K. M. 1987. Vehicle and train collision fatalities of moose: some management and socio-economic considerations. Swedish Wildlife Research Supplement 1: 699-703.
  • Conover M. R., Pitt W. C., Kessler K. K., DuBow T. J., Sanborn W. A. 1995. Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23 (3): 407-414.
  • Cserkész T., Farkas J. 2015. Annual trends in the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions on the main linear transport corridors (highway and railway) of Hungary. North-Western Journal of Zoology 11 (1): 41-50.
  • Di Giulio M., Holderegger R., Tobias S. 2009. Effects of habitat and landscape fragmentation on humans and biodiversity in densely populated landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2959-2968.
  • Grilo C., Bissonette J. A., Santos-Reis M. 2009. Spatial-temporal patterns in Mediterranean carnivore road casualities: consequences for mitigation. Biological Conservation 142 (2): 301-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008. 10.026.
  • Groot Bruinderink G. W. T. A., Hazebroek E. 1996. Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 10 (4): 1059-1067.
  • Gundersen H., Andreassen H. P. 1998. The risk of moose Alces alces collision: a predictive logistic model for moose-train accidents. Wildlife Biology 4 (2): 103-110.
  • Gundersen H., Andreassen H. P., Storaas T. 1998. Spatial and temporal correlates to Norwegian moose-train collisions. Alces 34: 385-394.
  • Hammar Ř., Harper D. A. T., Ryan P. D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 (1).
  • Hedlund J. H., Curtis P. D., Curtis G., Williams A. F. 2004. Methods to reduce traffic crashes involving deer: What works and what does not. Traffic Injury Prevention 5 (2): 122-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580490435079.
  • Ito T. Y., Lhagvasuren B., Tsunekawa A., Shinoda M., Takatsuki S., Buuveibaatar B., Chimeddorj B. 2013. Fragmentation of the habitat of wild ungulates by anthropogenic barriers in Mongolia. PLoS ONE 8 (2): e56995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056995.
  • Jasińska K., Werka J., Krauze-Gryz D., Wasilewski M. 2014. Urządzenia akustyczne UOZ-1 sposobem na ogranicze-nie kolizji z udziałem zwierząt na liniach kolejowych. Sylwan 158 (2): 143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan. 2013074.
  • Jasińska K. D., Żmihorski M., Krauze-Gryz D., Kotowska D., Werka J., Piotrowska D., Pärt T. 2019. Linking habitat composition, local population densities and traffic characteristics to spatial patterns of ungulate-train collisions. Journal of Applied Ecology 56: 2630-2640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13495.
  • Joshi R., Singh R., Joshi B. D., Gangwar R. S. 2009. Decline of the Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from Hardwar Forest Range of the Rajaji National park, India: the first documented case of free-ranging wildlife species. New York Science Journal 2: 1-12.
  • Krauze-Gryz D., Żmihorski M., Jasińska K., Kwaśny L., Werka J. 2017. Temporal pattern of wildlife-train collisions in Poland. Journal of Wildlife Management 81 (8): 1513-1519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21311.
  • Kuzyk G. W. 2016. Provincial population and harvest estimates of moose in British Columbia. Alces 52: 1-11.
  • Malo J. E., Suárez F., Díez A. 2004. Can we mitigate animal-vehicle accidents using predictive models? Journal of Applied Ecology 41 (4): 701-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00929.x.
  • Meidinger D., Pojar J. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Special Report Series Number 6. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Modafferi R. D. 1991. Train moose-kill in Alaska: characteristics and relationship with snowpack depth and moose distribution in lower Sustina Valley. Alces 27: 193-207.
  • Pollock S. Z., Whittington J., Nielsen S. E., St. Clair C. C. 2019. Spatiotemporal railway use by grizzly bears in Canada’s Rocky Mountains. The Journal of Wildlife Management 83 (8): 1787-1799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ jwmg.21750.
  • Rea R. V., Child K. N., Spata D. S., MacDonald D. 2010. Road and Rail Side Vegetation Management Implications of Habitat Use by Moose Relative to Brush Cutting Season. Environmental Management 46: 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9502-6.
  • Rolandsen C. M., Solberg E. J., Herfindal I., Van Moorter B., Sćther B.-E. 2011. Large-scale spatiotemporal variation in road mortality of moose: Is it all about population density? Ecosphere 2 (10): 12. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1890/ES11-00169.1.
  • Schwartz C. C., Bartley B. 1991. Reducing incidental moose mortality: Considerations for management. Alces 27: 227-231.
  • Schwartz C. C., Hundertmark K. J. 1993. Reproductive Characteristics of Alaskan Moose. The Journal of Wildlife Management 57 (3): 454-468.
  • Seiler A. 2005. Predicting locations of moose-vehicle collisions in Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 42 (2): 371-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01013.x.
  • Seiler A., Olsson M. 2017. Wildlife deterrent methods for railways. W: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. M. [red.]. Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. 277-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3--319-57496-7_17.
  • Shackleton D. 1999. Hoofed Mammals of British Columbia. Royal British Columbia Museum Handbook. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Spalding D. J., Lesowski J. 1971. Winter food of the cougar in southcentral British Columbia. Journal of Wildlife Management 35: 378-381. DOI: 10.2307/3799618.
  • Steiner W., Friedrich L., Hackländer K. 2014. A review on the temporal pattern of deer-vehicle accidents: impact of seasonal, diurnal and lunar effects in cervids. Accident Analysis and Prevention 66: 168-181. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.020.
  • Tanner A. L., Leroux S. J. 2015. Effect of roadside vegetation cutting on moose browsing. PLoS ONE 10 (8): e0133155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133155.
  • Trombulak S. C., Frissell C. A. 2000. Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities. Conservation Biology 14 (3): 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x.
  • Waller J. S., Servheen C. 2005. Effects of transportation infrastructure on grizzly bears in northwestern Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 69 (3): 985-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0985:EOTIOG] 2.0.CO;2.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-b0b3e4d1-222b-409c-8012-255bed051978
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.