Structural diversity of Papaver somniferum L. cell surfaces in vitro depending on particular steps of plant regeneration and morphogenetic program

• Autorzy: Ovecka M , Bobak M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Culture of Papaver somniferum in vitro was used for a characterisation of cell surface structures and mode of cell adhesion and cell separation during cell differentiation and plant regeneration in somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis. In early stages of somatic embryogenesis, cell type-specific and developmentally regulated change of cell morphogenesis was demonstrated. Cell wall of separated embryonic cells were self-covered with external tubular network, whereas morphogenetic co-ordination of adhered cells of somatic proembryos was supported by fine and fibrillar external cell wall continuum of peripheral cells, interconnecting also local sites of cell separation. Such type of cell contacts disappeared during histogenesis, when the protodermis formation took place. Tight cell adhesion of activated cells with polar cell wall thickening, and production of extent mucilage on the periphery were the crucial aspects of meristemoids. Fine amorphous layer covered developing shoot primordia, but we have not observed such comparable external fibrillar network. On the contrary intercellular separation of differentiated cells in regenerated organs, and accepting distinct developmental system of somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis, cell adhesion in early stages and ultrastructural changes associated with tissue disorganisation, and the subsequent reorganisation into either embryos or shoots appear to be regulatory morphogenetical events of plant regeneration in vitro.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

plant regeneration; cell surface; somatic embryogenesis; shoot organogenesis; extracellular matrix; Papaver somniferum; morphogenesis; in vitro; cell adhesion

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
• Rocznik: 1999
• Tom: 21
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.117-126,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Ovecka M

• Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 14, SK-84223 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

autor

Bobak M.

Bibliografia

• Brownlee C, Berger F. 1995. Extracellular matrix and pattern in plant embryos: on the look out for developmental information. Trends in Genetics 11: 344–348.
• Connoly JH, Berlyn G. 1996. The plant extracellular matrix. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1545–1546.
• Cyr RJ, Bustos MM, Guiltinan MJ, Fosket DE. 1987. Developmental modulation of tubulin protein and mRNA levels during somatic embryogenesis in cultured carrot cells. Planta 171: 365–376.
• Dijak M, Simmonds DH. 1988. Microtubule organization during early embryogenesis from mesophyll protoplasts of Medicago sativa L. Plant Science 58: 183–191.
• Domon J-M, Meyer Y, Faye L, David A, David H. 1994. Extracellular (glyco)proteins in embryogenic and non-embryogenic cell lines of Carribean pine. Comparison between phenotypes of stage one somatic embryos. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 32: 137–147.
• Du H, Clarke AE, Bacic A. 1996. Arabinogalactan-proteins: a class of extracellular matrix proteoglycans involved in plant growth and development. Trends in Cell Biology 6: 411–414.
• Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Vasseur J. 1990. Direct somatic embryogenesis in roots of Cichorium: Is callose an early marker? Annals of Botany 65: 539–545.
• Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Vasseur J. 1991. Direct somatic embryogenesis in leaves of Cichorium. A histological and SEM study of early stages. Protoplasma 162: 120–129.
• Dubois T, Dubois J, Guedira M, Diop A, Vasseur J. 1992. SEM characterisation of an extracellular matrix around somatic proembryos in roots of Cichorium. Annals of Botany 70: 119–124.
• Dudits D, Brge L, Gyrgyey J. 1991. Molecular and cellular approaches to the analysis of plant embryo development from somatic cells in vitro. Journal of Cell Science 99: 475–484.
• Emons AMC. 1994. Somatic embryogenesis: cell biological aspects. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 43: 1–14.
• Fahn A. 1979. Secretory tissues in plants. London: Academic Press.
• Goodner B, Quatrano RS. 1993. Fucus embryogenesis: a model to study the establishment of polarity. Plant Cell 5: 1471–1481.
• Hilbert JL, Dubois T, Vasseur J. 1992. Detection of embryogenesis-related proteins during somatic embryo formation in Cichorium. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 30: 733–741.
• Knox JP. 1990. Emerging patterns of organisation at the plant cell surface. Journal of Cell Science 96: 557–561.
• Knox JP. 1992a. Molecular probes for the plant cell surface. Protoplasma 167: 1–9.
• Knox JP. 1992b. Cell adhesion, cell separation and plant morphogenesis. Plant Journal 2: 137–141.
• Mariani P, Rascio N, Baldan B, Paiero P, Urso T. 1988. Epidermal mucilage cells in leaves of Salix species. Flora 181: 137–145.
• Mo LH, Egertsdotter U, von Arnold S. 1996. Secretion of specific extracellular proteins by somatic embryos of Picea abies is dependent on embryo morphology. Annals of Botany 77: 143–152.
• Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.
• Ovečka M, Bobák M, Erdelský K, Šamaj J, Blehová A, Krištín J. 1996. Morphology and conversion ability of somatic embryos in long-term embryogenic callus culture of Papaver somniferum. Biologia (Bratislava) 51: 417–423.
• Ovečka M, Bobák M, Šamaj J. 1997. Development of shoot primordia in tissue culture of Papaver somniferum L. Biologia Plantarum 39: 499–506.
• Ovečka M, Bobák M, Blehová A, Krištín J. 1997/98. Papaver somniferum regeneration by somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis. Biologia Plantarum 40: 321–328.
• Poethig RS. 1989. Genetic mosaics and cell lineage analysis in plants. Trends Genetics 5: 273–277.
• Poulsen GB, Frugis G, Albrechtsen M, Mariotti D. 1996. Synthesis of extracellular proteins in embryogenic and non-embryogenic cell cultures of alfalfa. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 44: 257–260.
• Reuzeau C, Pont-Lezica RF. 1995. Comparing plant and animal extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton connections — are they alike? Protoplasma 186: 113–121.
• Roberts K. 1989. The plant extracellular matrix. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 1: 1020–1027.
• Roberts K. 1994. The plant extracellular matrix: in a new expansive mood. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 6: 688–694.
• Sawidis T. 1991. A histochemical study of nectaries of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1477–1487.
• Sondahl MR, Salisbury JL, Sharp WR. 1979. SEM characterization of embryogenic tissue and globular embryos during high frequency somatic embryogenesis in coffee callus cells. Zeitschrift fr Pflanzenphysiologie 94: 185–188.
• Stacey NJ, Roberts K, Knox JP. 1990. Patterns of expression of the JIM4 arabinogalactan-protein epitope in cell cultures and during somatic embryogenesis in Daucus carota. Planta 180: 285–292.
• Sterk P, Booij H, Schellekens GA, Van Kammen A, De Vries SC. 1991. Cell-specific expression of the carrot EP2 lipid transfer protein gene. Plant Cell 3: 907–921.
• Šamaj J, Bobák M, Erdelský K. 1990. Histological-anatomical studies of the structure of the organogenic callus in Papaver somniferum L. Biologia Plantarum 32: 14–18.
• Šamaj J, Bobák M, Blehová A, Krištín J, Auxtová-Šamajová O. 1995. Developmental SEM observations on an extracellular matrix in embryogenic calli of Droera rotundifolia and Zea mays. Protoplasma 186: 45–49.
• Thorpe TA, Murashige T. 1968. Starch accumulation in shoot-forming tobacco callus cultures. Science 160: 421–422.
• Verdus M-C, Dubois T, Dubois J, Vasseur J. 1993. Ultrastructural changes in leaves of Cichorium during somatic embryogenesis. Annals of Botany 72: 375–383.