Selection of rendezvous sites and reuse of pup raising areas among wolves Canis lupus of north-eastern Apennines, Italy

• Autorzy: Capitani C. , Mattioli L. , Avanzinelli E. , Gazzola A. , Lamberti P. , Mauri L. , Scandura M. , Viviani A. , Apollonio M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A coarse scale analysis was carried out of factors affecting rendezvous site selection and fidelity to pup raising areas in wolfCanis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 packs inhabiting the north eastern Apennines, Italy. From 1993 to 2004, 44 rendezvous sites were identified, and compared with random sites for variables related to topography, habitat, and human presence. Rendezvous sites were significantly more frequent inside protected areas and at a significantly greater distance from paved roads and villages than random sites. Moreover, they were located on a significantly steeper slope and at a higher absolute elevation than random sites, whereas we did not observe selection of a particular aspect. Deciduous forests were selected, whereas open areas were not used. Canopy cover above 70% was positively selected. Distance from protected areas border and paved roads, and presence of deciduous forest proved the main factors affecting rendezvous site distribution. In four cases we observed the reuse of the same rendezvous sites for two consecutive years. Some packs tended to locate their rendezvous sites in small portions of their territory, thus implying that some areas are more suitable for pup raising.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.395-404,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Capitani C.

• University of Sassari, Via F.Muroni, 25- I07100, Sassari, Italy

autor

Mattioli L.

autor

Avanzinelli E.

autor

Gazzola A.

autor

Lamberti P.

autor

Mauri L.

autor

Scandura M.

autor

Viviani A.

autor

Apollonio M.

Bibliografia

• Apollonio M., Mattioli L., Scandura M., Mauri L., Gazzola A. and Avanzinelli E. 2004. Wolves in the Casentinesi Forests: insight for wolf conservation in Italy from a protected area with a rich wild prey community. Biological Conservation 120: 249–260.
• Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P. and Thompson W. L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 912–923.
• Avisoft SAS LAB PRO 1999. Avisoft SAS LAB PRO version 3.0. Raimund Specht, Berlin, Germany.
• Ballard W. B. and Dau J. R. 1983. Characteristics of gray wolf (Canis lupus) den and rendezvous sites in south--central Alaska. Canadian Field-Naturalist 97: 299–302.
• Boertje R. D. and Stephenson R. O. 1992. Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Zoology, London 70: 2441–2443.
• Capitani C., Bertelli I., Varuzza P., Scandura M. and Apollonio M. 2004. A comparative analysis of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in three different Italian ecosystems. Mammalian Biology 69: 1–10.
• Capitani C. 2005. Distribution and dynamics of a wolf (Canis lupus) population in Eastern-Central Apennines. PhD thesis, University of Sassari, Sassari: 1–132.
• Chapman R. C. 1977. The effects of human disturbance on wolves (Canis lupus). MSc thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks: 1–209.
• Ciucci P., Boitani L., Francisci F. and Andreoli G. 1997. Home-range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. Journal of Zoology, London 243: 803–819.
• Ciucci P. and Boitani L. 1998. Wolf and dog depredation on livestock in central Italy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 504–514.
• Ciucci P. and Mech L. D. 1992. Selection of wolf dens in relation to winter territories in northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 899–995.
• Cozza K., Fico R., Battistini L. and Rogers E. 1996. The damage conservation interface illustrated by predation on domestic livestock in central Italy. Biological Conservation 78: 329–336.
• Fico R., Morosetti G. and Giovannini A. 1993. The impact of predators on livestock in the Abruzzo region of Italy. Revue scientifique et technique, Office International des Epizooties 12: 39–50.
• Fuller T. K. 1989. Denning behaviour of wolves in north--central Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 121: 184–188.
• Fuller T. K., Mech L. D. and Cochrane J. F. 2003. Wolf population dynamics. [In: Wolves: behaviour, ecology and conservation. L. D. Mech and L. Boitani, eds]. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 161–191.
• Gazzola A., Avanzinelli E., Mauri L., Scandura M. and Apollonio M. 2002. Temporal changes of howling in south European wolf packs. Italian Journal of Zoology, London 69: 157–161.
• Gu W. and Swihart R. K. 2004. Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife--habitat models. Biological Conservation 116: 195–203.
• Harrington F. H. and Asa C. S. 2003. Wolf communication. [In: Wolves: behaviour, ecology and conservation. L. D. Mech and L. Boitani, eds]. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 66–103.
• Harrington F. H. and Mech L. D. 1982a. Patterns of homesites attendance in two Minnesota wolf packs. [In: Wolves of the world-perspective of behaviour, ecology, and conservation. F. H. Harrington and P. C. Paquet, eds]. Parkridge, New Jersey: Noyes Publications: 81–105.
• Harrington F. H. and Mech L. D. 1982b. An analysis of howling response parameters useful for wolf pack censusing. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 686–693.
• Heard D. C. and Williams T. M. 1992. Distribution of wolf dens on migratory caribou ranges in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 1504–1510.
• Jordan P. A., Shelton P. C. and Allen D. L. 1967. Number, turnover and social structure of the Isle Royal wolf population. American Zoologist 7: 233–252.
• Joslin P. W. B. 1966. Summer activities of two timber wolf (Canis lupus) packs in Algonquin Park. MSc thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto: 1–99.
• Joslin P. W. B. 1967. Movements and rendezvous sites of timber wolves in Algonquin Park. American Zoologist 7: 279–288.
• Kolenoski G. B. and Johnston D. 1967. Radio-tracking timber wolves in Ontario. American Zoologist 7: 289–303.
• Manly B. F. J., McDonald L. L, Thomas D. L., Mc Donald T. L. and Erickson W. P. (eds) 2002. Resource selection by animals. 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Dordrecht: 1–221.
• MapInfo Professional, 1998. MapInfo for Windows version 5.0. MapInfo Corp., New York, USA.
• Massolo A. and Meriggi A. 1998. Factors affecting habitat occupancy by wolves in northern Apennines (northern Italy): a model of habitat suitability. Ecography 21: 97–107.
• Mattioli L., Capitani C., Avanzinelli E., Bertelli I., Gazzola A. and Apollonio M. 2004. Predation by wolves (Canis lupus) on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in north-eastern Apennines, Italy. Journal of Zoology, London 264: 249–258.
• McLoughlin P. D., Walton L. R., Cluff H. D., Paquet P. C. and Ramsay M. A. 2004. Hierarchical habitat selection by tundra wolves. Journal of Mammalogy 85: 576–580.
• Mech L. D. 1970. The wolf: the ecology and behaviour of an endangered species. The Natural History Press, Garden City, New York: 1–384.
• Mech L. D. and Boitani L. (eds) 2003. Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–448.
• Mech L. D. and Packard J. M. 1990. Possible use of wolf den over several centuries. Canadian Field-Naturalist 104: 484–485.
• Mladenoff D. J., Sickley T. A., Haight R. G. and Wydeven A. P. 1995. A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favourable grey wolf habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region. Conservation Biology 9: 279–294.
• Murie A. 1944. The wolves of Mount McKinley. U.S. Natural Park Service Fauna Service 5: 1–238.
• Norris D. R., Therberge M. T. and Therberge J. B. 2002. Forest composition around wolf (Canis lupus) dens in eastern Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 866–872.
• Packard J. M. 2003. Wolf behaviour: reproductive, social and intelligent. [In: Wolves: behaviour, ecology and conservation. L. D. Mech and L. Boitani, eds.] The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 35–65.
• Peters R. 1979. Mental maps in wolf territoriality. [In: The behaviour and ecology of wolves. E. Klinghammer, ed]. Garland STMP Press, New York: 119–152.
• Scandura M. 2004. The use of microsatellites in the study of social structure in large mammals: Italian wolf and fallow deer as case studies. PhD thesis, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld: 1–132.
• Scandura M. 2005. Individual sexing and genotyping from blood spots on the snow: A reliable source of DNA for non-invasive genetic surveys. Conservation Genetics 6: 871–874.
• Scandura M., Capitani C., Iacolina L. and Apollonio M. 2006. An empirical approach for reliable microsatellite genotyping of wolf DNA from multiple non invasive sources. Conservation Genetics DOI 10.1007/s10592-005-9106-5.
• SPSS 1997. SPSS for Windows 8.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago Illinois.
• Theuerkauf J., Rouys S. and Jędrzejewski W. 2003. Selection of dens, rendezvous and resting sites by wolves in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 163–167.
• Thiel R. P., Merril S. and Mech L. D. 1998. Tolerance by denning wolvesCanis lupus to human disturbance. Canadian Field Naturalist 112: 340–342.
• Young S. P. 1944. The wolves of North America, part I. American Wildlife Institute Washington D.C.: 1–385.