PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2005 | 46 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Optimisation of the microbiological mutagenicity assay based on genetically modified Vibrio harveyi strains

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Recently, we have developed a novel assay designed for detection of mutagenic pollution of the marine environment. This assay is based on the use of a series of genetically modified strains (named BB7, BB7M, BB7X and BB7XM) of a marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi. Sensitivity of the V. harveyi mutagenicity assay was found to be similar to, or even somewhat higher than, that of the commonly used Ames test. Subsequent studies indicated that this assay may be useful in assessment of mutagenic contamination of the marine environment. Nevertheless, we assumed that improvement of this assay is still possible, and thus we aimed to optimise its procedures. Here we present our research on the optimisation of the V. harveyi mutagenicity assay, which indicated that different tester strains used in this assay give the best results depending upon the experimental conditions employed. Incubation of bacteria in a buffer, rather than in a nutrient broth, containing a mutagen, increased the efficiency of the assay with BB7 and BB7M strains, but had a deleterious effect in the case of BB7X and BB7XM. The latter couple of strains revealed higher mutagenicity in the plate assay, as compared to the liquid medium assay. However, the opposite effect was observed for BB7 and BB7M. Low-dose (1 J m⁻²) UV irradiation, as well as 30 min incubation in 0.1 M CaCl₂, had no significant effect on the efficiency of the assay when using BB7 and BB7M, whereas the number of mutagen-induced mutants of BB7X and BB7XM strains increased about two times under these conditions. Our previous experiments indicated that various tester strains revealed different sensitivity to particular mutagens. Thus, a series of strains should be used in the assay. Results presented in this report show that different conditions should be used for two pairs of the tester strains: BB7 and BB7M, and BB7X and BB7XM.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

46

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.241-246,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdynia, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdynia, Poland
autor
  • Department of Molecular Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdynia, Poland
  • Department of Molecular Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Belas R, Mileham A, Cohn D, Hilmen M, Simon M, Silverman M, 1982. Bacterial luminescence: isolation and expression of the luciferase genes from Vibrio harveyi. Science 218: 791-793.
  • Czyż A, Jasiecki J, Bogdan A, Szpilewska H, Węgrzyn G, 2000. Genetically modified Vibrio harveyi strains as potential bioindicators of mutagenic pollution of marine environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 599-605.
  • Czyż A, Zielke R, Konopa G, Węgrzyn G, 2001. A Vibrio harveyi insertional mutant in the cgtA (obg,yhbZ) gene, whose homologues are present in diverse organisms ranging from bacteria to humans and are essential genes in many bacterial species. Microbiology 147: 183-191.
  • Czyż A, Szpilewska H, Dutkiewicz R, Kowalska W, Biniewska-Godlewska A, Węgrzyn G, 2002. Comparison of the Ames test and a newly developed assay for detection of mutagenic pollution of marine environments. Mutat Res 519: 67-74.
  • Czyż A, Kowalska W, Węgrzyn G, 2003. Vibrio harveyi mutagenicity assay as a preliminary test for detection of mutagenic pollution of marine water. Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 70: 1065-1070.
  • Dahlberg AE, 1989. The functional role of ribosomal RNA in protein synthesis. Cell 57: 525-529.
  • Dixon DR, Pruski AM, Dixon LR, Jha AN, 2002. Marine invertebrate eco-genotoxicology: a methodological overview. Mutagenesis 17: 495-507.
  • Goldman R, Shields PG, 2003. Food mutagens. J Nutr 133 (Suppl 3): 965S-973S.
  • Heddle JA, Moody J, Thompson LU, Torous DK, Trentin G, 1999. New approaches to antimutagenesis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 18: 95-101.
  • Jha AN, 2004. Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: an overview. Mutat Res 552: 1-17.
  • Klein G, Walczak R, Krasnowska E, Błaszczak A, Lipińska B, 1995. Characterization of heat-shock response of the marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi. Mol Microbiol 16: 801-811.
  • Kovalchuk I, Kovalchuk O, Hohn B, 2001. Biomonitoring the genotoxicity of environmental factors with transgenic plants. Trends Plant Sci 6: 306-310.
  • Mortelmans K, Zeiger E, 2000. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res 455: 29-60.
  • Piosik J, Ulanowska K, Gwizdek-Wiśniewska A, Czyż A, Kapuściński J, Węgrzyn G, 2003. Alleviation of mutagenic effects of polycyclic aromatic agents (quinacrine mustard, ICR-191 and ICR-170) by caffeine and pentoxifylline. Mutat Res 530: 47-57.
  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Flarbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Vargas VM, 2003. Mutagenic activity as a parameter to assess ambient air quality for protection of the environment and human health. Mutât Res 544: 313-319.
  • Węgrzyn G, Czyż A, 2003. Detection of mutagenic pollution of natural environment using microbiological assays. J Appl Microbiol 95: 1175-1181.
  • Winn RN, 2001. Transgenic fish as models in environmental toxicology. ILAR J 42: 322-329.
  • Zielke R, Sikora A, Dutkiewicz R, Węgrzyn G, Czyż A, 2003. Involvement of the cgtA gene function in stimulation of DNA repair in Escherichia coli and Vibrio harveyi. Microbiology 149: 1763-1770.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-f7e15f36-37ca-4d15-826a-ad870c505438
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.