Diet selection by red-backed voles Clethrionomys gapperi

• Autorzy: Kasparian K. , Millar J.S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Food supplementation studies often assume that animals will select artificial diets in their natural environment, and that high-protein, high-energy foods are the most appropriate supplement. These assumptions were tested in red-backed voles Clethrionomys gapperi Vigors, 1830 using food-choice experiments with sunflower seeds, oats, and commercial diets in the laboratory and field. Preferred level of dietary protein was also examined using isocaloric diets that varied only in protein content (14%, 20% and 30%). Preferences exhibited in the above trials were subsequently examined relative to natural forage. Voles demonstrated a strong preference for sunflower seeds over oats, dried alfalfa, and rabbit, guinea pig, rat and cat food. Voles preferred the 14% protein diet over the 20% and 30% protein diets. Although sunflower seeds contain more than 20% protein, voles consistently preferred this food over natural forage, perhaps because of their high fat and energy content. This indicates that tradeoffs in protein content may be made to maximize energy. We suggest that red-backed voles will select sunflower seeds in their natural environment, and that their preference for low protein likely reflects their herbivorous diet. This study highlights the importance of an a priori understanding of species-specific preferences and requirements when designing food supplementation studies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

supplement; food choice; red-backed vole; diet selection; protein; vole; food preference; Clethrionomys gapperi

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 49
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.289-300,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kasparian K.

• University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5B7

autor

Millar J.S.

Bibliografia

• Boutin S. 1990. Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 203–220.
• Bronson F. J. 1998. Do small voles require less food than large voles? Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 414–418.
• Bryant J. P. and Chapin III F. S. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40: 357–368.
• Chan-McLeod A. C. A., White R. G. and Holleman D. F. 1994. Effects of protein and energy intake, body condition, and season on nutrient partitioning and milk production in caribou and reindeer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 938–947.
• Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D. and Guinness F. E. 1989. Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337: 260–262.View
• Cole F. R. and Batzli G. O. 1978. Influence of supplemental feeding on a vole population. Journal of Mammalogy 59: 809–819.
• Desy E. A. and Thompson C. F. 1983. Effects of supplemental food on aMicrotus pennsylvanicus population in central Illinois. Journal of Animal Ecology 52: 127–140.
• Ditchkoff S. S., Boyd C. S., Welch E. R. Jr, Raglin J. B. and Lochmiller R. L. 1998. Nitrogen requirements of the adult prairie vole (Microtus ochragaster). American Midland Naturalist 140: 387–392.
• Eccard J. A. and Ylönen H. 2001. Initiation of breeding after winter in bank voles: effects of food and population density. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 1743–1753.
• Gilbert B. S. and Krebs C. J. 1981. Effects of extra food onPeromyscus andClethrionomys populations in southern Yukon. Oecologia 51: 326–331.
• Grodziński W. and Sawicka-Kapusta K. 1970. Energy values of tree-seeds eaten by small mammals. Oikos 21: 52–58.
• Holland E. A., Parton W. J., Detling J. K. and Coppock D. L. 1992. Physiological responses of plant populations to herbivory and their consequences for ecosystem nutrient flow. The American Naturalist 140: 685–706.View
• Holmes W. G. 1991. Predator risk affects foraging behaviour of pikas: observational and experimental evidence. Animal Behaviour 42: 111–120.
• Kerley G. I. H. and Erasmus T. 1991. What do mice select for in seeds? Oecologia 86: 261–267.
• Koskela E., Jonsson P. T., Hartikainen T. and Mappes T. 1998. Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and litter size in the bank vole,Clethrionomys glareolus. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 265: 1129–1134.
• Krebs J. R. and Kacelnik A. 1991. Decision-making. [In: Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. Krebs J. R. and Davies N. B., eds]. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 105–136.
• Lewis C. E., Clark T. W. and Derting T. L. 2001. Food selection by the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) on the basis of energy and protein contents. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 562–598.
• Martell A. M. 1981. Food habits of southern red-backed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi) in northern Ontario. Canadian Field-Naturalist 95: 325–328.
• Maynard L. A., Loosli J. K., Hintz H. F. and Warner R. G. 1979. The proteins and their metabolism. [In: Animal nutrition. Zappa C. R., ed]. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York: 136–185.
• McAdam A. G. and Millar J. S. 1999a. Dietary protein constraint on age at maturity: an experimental test with wild deer mice. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 733–740.
• McAdam A. G. and Millar J. S. 1999b. The effects of dietary protein content on growth and maturation in deer mice. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 1822–1828.
• McManus J. J. 1974. Bioenergetics and water requirements of the redback vole,Clethrionomys gapperi. Journal of Mammalogy 55: 30–44.
• Merritt J. F. 1981.Clethrionomys gapperi. Mammalian Species 146: 1–9.
• Millar J. S. and Zwickel F. C. 1972. Characteristics and ecological significance of hay piles of pikas. Mammalia 36: 657–667.
• Naim M., Brand J. G., Christensen C. M., Kare M. R. and Van Buren S. 1986. Preference of rats for food flavors and texture in nutritionally controlled semi-purified diets. Physiology and Behavior 37: 15–21.View
• National Research Council. 1995. Nutrient requirements of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington: 1–173.
• Norrie M. B. and Millar J. S. 1990. Food resources and reproduction in four microtine rodents. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 641–650.
• Perrin M. R. 1979. Seasonal variation in growth, body composition, and diet ofClethrionomys gapperi in spruce forest. Acta Theriologica 24: 299–318.
• Prévot-Julliard A., Henttonen H., Yoccoz N. G. and Stenseth N. C. 1999. Delayed maturation in female bank voles: optimal decision or social constraint? Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 684–697.
• Ramos J. A. 1996. The influence of size, shape, and phenolic content on the selection of winter foods by the Azores bullfinch (Pyrrhula murina). Journal of Zoology, London 238: 415–433.
• Robbins C. T. 1993. Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press Inc, New York: 1–352.
• Scherz H. and Senser F. 1994. Food composition and nutrition tables. CRC Press, Boca Raton: 1–1091.
• Schloyer C. R. 1977. Food habits ofClethrionomys gapperi on clearcuts in West Virginia. Journal of Mammalogy 58: 677–679.
• Shenk J. S. 1976. The meadow voles as an experimental animal. Laboratory Animal Science 26: 664–669.
• Siegel S. 1956. Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc, New York: 1–312.
• Smith C. C. and Folmer D. 1972. Food preferences of squirrels. Ecology 53: 82–91.
• Spears N. and Clarke J. R. 1987. Effect of nutrition, temperature and photoperiod on the rate of sexual maturation of the field vole (Microtus agrestis). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 80: 175–181.View
• SPSS Inc. 2001. SPSS version 11.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago.
• StatSoft Inc. 1995. Statistica for Windows. StatSoft Inc, Tulsa.
• Teferi T. and Millar J. S. 1993. Early maturation by northernPeromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1743–1747.
• Vickery W. L. 1984. Optimal diet models and rodent food consumption. Animal Behaviour 32: 340–348.
• Vickery W. L., Elliott F. C. and Thomas J. W. 1994. Meadow vole nutrition studies with semisynthetic diets. Journal of Nutrition 100: 1437–1446.
• Zar J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Pentice-Hall, New Jersey: 1–663.