Artificial hybridization of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus mugo Turra

• Autorzy: Kormutak A , Ostrolucka M. , Vookova B. , Pretova A. , Feckova M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Artificial hybridization experiments revealed a relatively high degree of crossability between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo, ranging between 0.15 and 0.98. Differences between P. sylvestris x P. mugo and reciprocal hybrids of the species were observed. Hybrid seeds of P. sylvestris x P. mugo shared higher germination potential than seeds from selling, controlled intraspecific crossing, and open pollination. The corresponding value in reciprocal combination was slightly lower. The hybrid nature of the seeds obtained was shown by restriction analysis of chloroplast DNA (cp DNA) using the trnV-trnH/Hinf I primer-enzyme combination.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

artificial hybridization; Scotch pine; cross-pollination; mountain dwarf pine; hybridization; Pinus sylvestris; seed viability; Pinus mugo

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.129-134,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kormutak A

• Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P.O.Box 39A, SK-950 07 Nitra, Slovakia

autor

Ostrolucka M.

autor

Vookova B.

autor

Pretova A.

autor

Feckova M.

Bibliografia

• Bertsch K. 1906. Die Pinus - Formen in Federseeried. Allgemeine Botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik 12: 7-12.
• Bobowicz MA, Stephan BR, and Prus-Glowacki W. 2000. Genetic variation of F1 hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostrata and Pinus sylvestris in anatomical needle traits. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 69: 207-214.
• Boratyńska K, Boratyński A, and Lewandowski A. 2003. Morphology of Pinus uliginosa (Pinaceae) needles from populations exposed to and isolated from the direct influence of Pinus sylvestris. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 83-91.
• Boratyński A, Boratyńska K, Lewandowski A, Gołab Z, and Kiciński P. 2003. Evidence of the possibility of natural reciprocal crosses between Pinus sylvestris and P. uliginosa based on the phenology of reproductive organs. Flora 198: 377-388.
• Brügger CG. 1886. Mittheilungen über neue und kritische Pflanzenformen. Erste Serie. Jahresbericht Naturwissenschaftlicher Gesellschaft Graubündens 29: 49-178.
• Christ H. 1864. Beiträge zur Kenntnis europäischer Pinus - Arten. III. Die Formen der Pinus sylvestris des Ober-Engadins (Ctn. Graubünden). Flora 22: 147-160.
• Christensen KJ, and Dar GH. 1997. A morphometric analysis of spontaneous and artificial hybrids of Pinus mugo x sylvestris (Pinaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 17: 77-86.
• Dengler A. 1932. Künstliche Bestäubungsversuche an Kiefern. Zeitschrift für Forst-Jagdwesen 64: 513-555.
• Dobrinov I. 1965. Study on natural hybrids between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo var. mughus in Bulgaria. Naučne Trudy Lesotechnieskogo Instituta, Sofia 13: 39-48.
• Dobrinov I, and Jagdzidis G. 1971. Spontaneous hybrids between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo in Bulgaria. Gorsko Stopanstwo 11: 28-30.
• Duffield JW. 1952. Relationships and species hybridization in the genus Pinus. Zeitschrift für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung 1: 93-97.
• Kormuťák A, Vooková B, Salajová T, Wang WR, and Szmidt A. 2002. Morphometric and genetic analyses of the putative hybrid Pinus sylvestris x Pinus mugo in Habovka. Abstracts of IUFRO Symposium of Population and Evolutionary Genetics of Forest Trees, 25-29 August 2002, Stará Lesná, Slovakia: 29.
• Little EL, and Critchfield WB. 1969. Subdivisions of the genus Pinus (Pines). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 1144.
• Marcet E. 1967. Über den Nachweis spontaner Hybriden von Pinus mugo Turra und Pinus silvestris L. Aufgrund von Nadelmerkmalen. Berichte Schweizer Botanischen Gesellschaft 77: 314-361.
• Murray MG, and Thompson WF. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. Nucleic Acid Research 8: 4231-4235.
• Musil I. 1977. Needle variation in the complex Pinus mugo and Pinus sylvestris. Preslia (Prague) 19: 1-6.
• Net-Sarqueda C, Plumettaz Clot AC, and Bécholey I. 1988. Mise en évidence de l’hybridation introgressive entre Pinus sylvestris L. et Pinus uncinata DC. En Valais (Suisse) par deux méthodes multivariées. Botanica Helvetica 98:161-169.
• Parducci L, and Szmidt A. 1999. PCR-RFLP analysis of cpDNA in the genus Abies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 802-808.
• Pazourková Z. 1986. Botanical microtechnique. Charles University, Prague.
• Pilger R. 1926. Genus Pinus. In: Engler A and Prantl K [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 3. Gymnospermae. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
• Price RA, Liston A, and Strauss SH. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In: Richardson DM [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 49-68. Cambridge University Press.
• Prus-Glowacki W, and Stephan BR. 1998. Immunochemical and isoenzymatic characterization of hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostrata and Pinus sylvestris. Forest Genetics 5: 155-163.
• Sarvas R. 1962. Investigation on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus silvestris. Communicationes Instituti Forestalls Fenniae 53: 1-198.
• Schmidt E. 1951. Die aufrechten Bergfhren in der Schweiz.
• Schweizer Beitrag für Dendrologie 3: 9-13.
• Shaw GR. 1914. The genus Pinus. Arnold Arboretum Publ. No. 5.
• Houghton Mifflin Corporation, Boston.
• Šmelko Š, and Wolf J. 1977. Statistical methods in forestry. Príroda, Bratislava.
• Staszkiewicz J, and Tyszkiewicz M. 1969. Natural hybrids of Pinus mugo Turra x Pinus sylvestris L. in Nowy Targ Valley. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 15: 187-212.
• Viewegh J. 1981. Variability of the hybrid swarms Pinus mugo x Pinus silvestris on peat-bog in Zuberec, Orava. Folia Dendrologica 8: 41-59.
• Wachowiak W, Leśniewicz K, Odrzykoski IJ, Augustyniak H, and Prus-Glowacki W. 2000. Species specific cpDNA marker useful for studies on the hybridisation between Pinus mugo and P. sylvestris. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 69: 273-276.