PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2005 | 50 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

The diet of field voles Microtus agrestis at low population density in upland Britain

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Studies on field volesMicrotus agrestis Linnaeus, 1758 in lowland grasslands have shown them to be unselective grazers. The diet of the field vole in upland Britain was investigated using feeding trials with four of the dominant British upland monocots,Molinia caerulea,Nardus stricta, Deschampsia flexuosa and Eriophorum vaginatum. The suitability of faecal analysis was assessed and then used to analyse the diet of wild voles from faecal samples. Percentages of plant species in the faeces were compared to percentages on the ground in sites dominated byMolinia caerulea, Eriophorum vaginatum,Nardus stricta andCalluna vulgaris. Significant preferences for the grassDeschampsia flexuosa were observed in feeding trials and in the wild while the sedgeEriophorum vaginatum was avoided in both. There was no clear preference forMolinia caerulea andNardus stricta. Preference for plant species was related to palatability and nutrient content. The low nutrient conditions in British uplands mean that voles that live in these environments must be selective feeders to maximise nutrient intake.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

50

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.483-492,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • University of Manchester, Oxford Rd Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.

Bibliografia

  • Aebischer N. J., Robertson P. A. and Kenward R. E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313–1325.
  • Aitchison J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, New York: 1–416.
  • Chadwick M. J. 1960.Nardus stricta L. Journal of Ecology 48: 255–267.
  • Chitty D., Pimentel D. and Krebs C. J. 1968. Food supply of overwintered voles. Journal of Animal Ecology 37: 113–120.
  • Dyczkowski J. and Yalden D. W. 1998. An estimate of the impact of predators on the British field vole (Microtus agrestis) population. Mammal Review 28: 165–184.
  • Evans D. M. 1973. Seasonal variations in the body composition and nutrition of the voleMicrotus agrestis. Journal of Animal Ecology 42: 1–18.
  • Faber J. and Ma W. 1986. Observations on seasonal dynamics in diet consumption of the field voleMicrotus agrestis with some methodological remarks. Acta Theriologica 31: 479–490.
  • Ferns P. N. 1979. Growth, reproduction and residency in a declining population ofMicrotus agrestis. Journal of Animal Ecology 48: 739–758.
  • Hansson L. 1970. Methods of morphological diet micro-analysis in small rodents. Oikos 21: 255–266.
  • Hansson L. 1971. Habitat, food and population dynamics of the field voleMicrotus agrestis in south Sweden. Viltrevy 8: 267–378.
  • Harris S., Morris P., Wray S. and Yalden D. 1995. A review of British mammals: Population estimates and conservation status of British mammals other than cetaceans. JNCC, Peterborough: 1–216.
  • Hjalten J., Danell K. and Ericson L. 1996. Food selection by two vole species in relation to plant growth strategies and plant chemistry. Oikos 76: 181–190.
  • Kirkham F. W. 2001. Nitrogen uptake and nutrient limitation in six hill moorland species in relation to atmospheric nitrogen deposition in England and Wales. Journal of Ecology 89: 1041–1053.
  • Krebs J. R. and Davies N. B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 1–420.
  • Magurran A. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Croom Helm, London: 1–179.
  • Manly B. F. J., Macdonald L. L., Thomas D. L., McDonald T. L. and Erickson W. P. 2002. Resource selection by animals: Statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer Academic, London: 1–221.
  • Phillipson J., Sarrazincomans M. and Stomatopoulos C. 1983. Food-consumption byMicrotus agrestis and the unsuitability of fecal analysis for the determination of food preference. Acta Theriologica 28: 397–416.
  • Ranson R. M. 1934. The field vole (Microtus) as a laboratory animal. Journal of Animal Ecology 3: 70–76.
  • Scurfield G. 1954.Deschampsia flexuosa (L.) Trin. Journal of Ecology 42: 225–233.
  • Turchin P. and Batzli O. G. 2001. Availability of food and the population dynamics of arvicoline rodents. Ecology 82: 1521–1534.
  • Wheeler P. 2002. The distribution of mammals across the upland landscape. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester: 1–250.
  • Williams O. 1962. A technique for studying microtine food habits. Journal of Mammalogy 43: 365–368.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-d8c8b090-2fc4-4044-943b-dcb791db865c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.