Impairment of the oral stereognosis in the partial anterior open bite

• Autorzy: Koczorowski M , Wozniak W. , Koczorowski R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study was performed in 20 children with partial anterior open bite and in 20 children of a control group. Stereognosis was evaluated on the basis of correct recognition responses to silicone pieces of the different shapes. Pieces were put on the dorsal surface of the tongue close to its apex. It was evident that the stereognostic ability was impaired in children with anterior open bite. This ability also decreased after infiltration anaesthesia of the tongue. The study indicated that the tongue plays an important role in oral stereognosis.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

oral stereognosis; dental status; tongue; open bite; dental disorder

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 65
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.221-224,fig.,ref

Twórcy

autor

Koczorowski M

• University of Medical Sciences, Swiecickiego 6, 60-781 Poznan, Poland

autor

Wozniak W.

autor

Koczorowski R.

Bibliografia

• 1. Berry DC, Mahood M (1966) Oral stereognosis and oral ability in relation to prosthetic treatment. Br Dent J, 120: 179–185.
• 2. Capra NF (1995) Mechanisms of oral sensation. Dysphagia, 10: 235–247.
• 3. Colleti EA, Geffner D, Schlanger P (1976) Oral stereognostic ability among tongue thrusters with interdental lisp, tongue thrusters without interdental lisp and normal children. Perceptual Motor Skills, 12: 259–268.
• 4. Dahan SJ (1992) Perception and malocclusion: an assessment of their interface with oral dysfunction. Jap Orthod Soc, 51: 89–98.
• 5. Darian-Smith J (1973) The trigeminal system. In: Iggo A (ed.) Somatosensory system. Handbook of sensory physiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 271–314.
• 6. Gardner EP, Kandel ER (2000) Touch. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM (eds.) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill, New York, San Francisco, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, pp. 451–471.
• 7. Gardner EP, Martin JH, Jessel TM (2000) The bodily senses. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM (eds.) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill, New York, San Francisco, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, pp. 431–450.
• 8. Goodwin AW, Wheat HE (2005) Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Ann Rev Neurosci, 27: 53–77.
• 9. Grossman R (1967) Methods in determining oral tactile experience. In: Bosma JF (ed.) Symposium on oral sensation and perception. Charles C Thomas Publ, Springfield, Illinois, pp. 161–181.
• 10. Henkin RL, Banks V (1967) Tactile perception of the tongue, palate and the hand of normal man. In: Bosma JF (ed.) Symposium on oral sensation and perception. Charles C Thomas Publ, Springfield, Illinois, pp. 564–578.
• 11. Jacobs R, Serhal CB, van Steenberghe D (1998) Oral stereognosis: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Invest, 2: 3–10.
• 12. Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1992) Neural meachanism of tactual form and texture perception. Ann Rev Neurosci, 15: 227–250.
• 13. Landt H, Fransson B (1975) Oral ability to recognize forms and oral muscular coordination ability in young and elderly adults. J Oral Rehabil, 2: 125–138.
• 14. Wheat HE, Goodwin AW (2001) Tactile discrimination of edge shape: limits on spatial resolution imposed by parameters of the peripheral neural population. J Neurosci, 21: 7751–7763.