Synchronizacja rui i superowulacja wplywaja na funkcje cialka zoltego krowy: czy manipulacje hormonalne zawsze przynosza oczekiwane efekty?

• Autorzy: Pilawski W , Siemieniuch M.J. , Skarzynski D.J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Influence of estrus synchronization and superovulation on corpus luteum functioning in cattle. Does hormonal manipulation always provide desirable effects?

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The main function of the corpus luteum (CL) is progesterone (P4) production, a factor which regulates the estrous cycle and provides proper embryo and fetus development, the hormone that determines the efficiency of reproduction. Estrus synchronization is one of the basal methods applied in reproductive biotechnics. However, pharmacological manipulation of the estrous cycle may cause various CL dysfunctions, including abnormal P4 synthesis after superovulation or synchronization of the cycle. In the authors studies the influence of different methods of estrous synchronization (injection of PGF₂α analogues: dinoprost, cloprostenol and luprositiol; or gestagens treatment: norgestomet) on CL sensitivity to luteotropic factors (LH and PGE₂) was investigated. With the use of PGF₂α analogues the lower action of luteotropic factors on the CL function was demonstrated in the CL after estrus synchronization. Physiological CL sensitivity to the stimulation was observed in CL from the cows with norgestomet-synchronized cycles. The only effects of dinoprost on CL functioning in vitro were conferrable and similar to the natural PGF₂α action. Other PGF₂α analogues much more powerfully and differently influenced the cells/tissues of the bovine reproductive tract compared to natural PGF₂α action. Lower P4 production in the CL after hormonal manipulation may cause insufficient protection of the embryo by the CL products during the first critical pregnancy period and lead to the early termination of pregnancy.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

prostaglandyna F2 alfa; superowulacja; bydlo; synchronizacja rui; krowy; cialko zolte; rozrod zwierzat

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 64
• Numer: 04B
• Opis fizyczny: s.525-527,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Pilawski W

• Instytut Rozrodu Zwierzat i Badan Zywnosci PAN, ul.Tuwima 10, 10-747 Olsztyn

autor

Siemieniuch M.J.

autor

Skarzynski D.J.

Bibliografia

• 1. Acosta T. J., Miyamoto A.: Vascular control of ovarian function: ovulation, corpus luteum formation and regression. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 82, 127-140.
• 2. Acosta T. J., Yoshizawa N., Ohtani M., Miyamoto A.: Local changes in blood flow within the early and midcycle corpus luteum after PGF₂α injection in the cow. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 66, 651-658.
• 3. Bah M. M., Acosta T. J., Pilawski W., Deptuła K., Okuda K., Skarżynski D. J.: Role of intraluteal prostaglandin F₂α, progesterone and oxytocin in basal and pulsatile progesterone release from developing bovine corpus luteum. Prostaglandins Other Lipid. Med. 2006, 79, 218-229.
• 4. Beal W. E., Milvae R. A., Hansel W.: Oestrous cycle length and plasma P4 concentrations following administration of PGF₂α early in the bovine oestrous cycle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1980, 59, 393-396.
• 5. Bielański A., Tischner M.: Biotechnologia rozrodu zwierząt. PAU, Kraków 1992, 117-136.
• 6. Hansel W., Dowd J. P.: New concepts of the control of CL function. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1986, 78, 755-768.
• 7. Hansen T. R., Randel R. D., Segerson E. C. Jr, Rutter L. M., Harms P. G.: Corpus luteum function following spontaneous or PGF-induced estrus in Brahman cows and heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 1987, 65, 524-533.
• 8. Humblot P.: The frequence and variation of embryonic mortality, and the use of pregnancy specific proteins to monitor pregnancy failure in ruminants. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 1999, 6, 19-27.
• 9. Jaśkowski J. M.: Superowulacja u krów - rodzaje preparatów gonadotropowych i sposoby ich podawania. Medycyna Wet. 1996, 52, 347-349.
• 10. Jaśkowski J. M., Urbaniak K.: Wpływ ingerencji hormonalnych na skuteczność zacieleń u biorczyń zarodków. Medycyna Wet. 2000, 56, 705-708.
• 11. Lafri M., Ponsart C., Nibart M., Durand M., Morel A., Jeanguyot N., Badinand F., De Mardi K., Humblot P.: Influence of CIDR treatment during superovulation on embryo production and hormonal patterns in cattle. Theriogenol. 2002, 58, 1141-1151.
• 12. Lei Z. M., Chegini N., Rao Ch. V.: Quantitative cell composition of human and bovine CL from various reproductive states. Biol. Reprod. 1991, 44, 1148-1156.
• 13. Lopez-Gatius F.: Effects of cloprostenol, human chorionic gonadotropin and estradiol benzoate treatment on estrus synchronization in dairy cows. Theriogenol. 1989, 32, 185-192.
• 14. McCracken J. A., Custer E. E., Lamsa J. C.: Luteolysis: A neuroendocrine-mediated event. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 263-323.
• 15. Meidan R., Levy N., Kisliouk T., Podlovny L., Rusiansky M., Klipper E.: The yin and yang of corpus luteum-derived endothelial cells: Balancing life and death. Dom. Ani. Endocrin. 2005, 29, 318-328.
• 16. Okada A., Kamada S., Jeon C. W., Miyamoto A., Fukus Y.: Incidence of abnormal corpus luteum in superovulated ewes. J. Reprod. Develop. 2000, 46, 397-402.
• 17. Pate J. L., Keyes P.: Immune cells in the corpus luteum: friends or foes? Reproduction 2001, 122, 665-676.
• 18. Shelton K., De Abreu G., Hunter M. G., Parkinson T. J., Lamming G. E.: Luteal inadequacy during the early luteal phase of subfertile cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1990, 90, 1-10.
• 19. Skarżyński D. J., Bogacki M., Kotwica J.: Changes in ovarian oxytocin secretion as an indicator of corpus luteum response to PGF₂α. Theriogenol. 1997, 48, 733-742.
• 20. Skarżyński D. J., Bogacki M., Kotwica J.: Involvement of ovarian steroids in basal and oxytocin-stimulated PGF₂α secretion from bovine endometrium in vitro. Theriogenol. 1999, 52, 385-397.
• 21. Skarżyński D. J., Jaroszewski J. J., Okuda K.: Luteotropic mechanisms in the bovine corpus luteum: role of oxytocin, prostaglandin F₂α, progesterone and noradrenaline. J. Reprod. Develop. 2001, 47, 125-137.
• 22. Skarzyński D. J., Jaroszewski J. J., Okuda K.: Role of tumor necrosis factor-α and nitric oxide in luteolysis in cattle. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2005, 29, 340-346.
• 23. Skarzyński D. J., Pilawski W., Bah M. M.: Analogues of prostaglandin (PG)F₂α regulate the function of the bovine corpus luteum (CL) differently. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2006, 41, 356 (P187).
• 24. Skarzyński D. J., Pilawski W., Wocławek-Potocka I., Bah M. M.: In vitro assessment of the corpus luteum (CL) function in cattle following different estrus synchronization protocols. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2003, 26 (Suppl 1), 189.
• 25. Thacher W. W., Moreira F., Pancarci S. M., Bartolome J. A., Santos J. E. P.: Strategies to optimize reproductive efficiency by regulation of ovarian function. Dom. Animal. Endocrinol. 2002, 23, 243-254.
• 26. Tsai S. J., Wiltbank M. C.: PGF₂α regulates distinct physiological changes in early and mid-cycle bovine corpora lutea. Biol. Reprod. 1998, 58, 346-352.
• 27. Urbaniak K., Jaśkowski J. M.: Wpływ CIDR-B lub hCG na wyniki zacieleń u krów biorczyń zarodków. Medycyna Wet. 2000, 56, 793-797.
• 28. Voughan L., Fitzpatrick E., Boland M. P., Roche J. F.: A histological study of CL from superovulated beef heifers. Animal. Reprod. Sci. 1996, 43, 1-14.
• 29. Wierzchoś E., Gregoraszczuk E., Stoklosowa S.: Follicles and CL function following spontaneous and PGF₂α induced estrus and superovulation in ewes. Endocr. Regul. 1995, 29, 121-126.
• 30. Zbylut J., Jaśkowski J. M.: Współczesne metody synchronizacji rui u krów mięsnych. Medycyna Wet. 1998, 54, 97-100.