Wplyw procedury otrzymywania antygenow ekskrecyjno-sekrecyjnych Trichinella spiralis na wynik testu ELISA u zarazonych swin

• Autorzy: Bien J

Warianty tytułu

EN

The influence of the procedure of excretory -secretory L1 Trichinella spiralis antigen preparation on the efficiency of an ELISA test in pigs

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Background. Trichinellosis is a parasitic zoonosis transmitted to humans by consumption of raw or undercooked meat from animals infected by worms of the Trichinella genus. Every year seropositive cases are found among the human population and thus trichinellosis still remains an epidemiologically important disease in Poland. The usefulness of ELISA for anti-T. spiralis IgG detection in pigs is still limited by the nature of antigen. The objective in the present study was to compare the usefulness of excretory-secretory antigens of L1 T. spiralis for the serological detection of IgG antibodies in pigs. Material and methods. The antigens were prepared in different laboratories: Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (N) in Germany, Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (W) in Italy and Ag ES L1 T. spiralis in Poland. Conventional, Iberian pigs were infected with 200, 1000 and 20 000 muscle larvae of T. spiralis. Serum samples were obtained at 5 and 1 dbi (day before infection), and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60 dpi (day post infection) and screened for specific IgG antibodies to excretory-secretory L1 T. spiralis antigens. Serum samples were obtained from the EU project TRICHIPORSE. The cut-off value of ELISA was determined on serum samples from 248 Trichinella-free pigs from Poznań and Boża Wola, that were examined by artificial digestion. Results. In pigs infected with 200 L1 T. spiralis larvae, specific IgG were detectable from 50 dpi, when the Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (N) was used, whereas when Ag ES L1T. spiralis (W) and Ag ES L1 T. spiralis were used, the specific IgG were detectable from 40 dpi. In pigs infected with 1000 L1 T. spiralis larvae, specific IgG was observed from 30 dpi when Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (W) and Ag ES L1 T. spiralis were used, but when Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (N) was used specific IgG were detectable from 40 dpi. In the group infected with the highest dose of T. spiralis larvae, specific IgG were detectable from 30 dpi when Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (N) and Ag ES L1 T. spiralis (W) were used, whereas when Ag ES L1 T. spiralis was used specific IgG were detectable from 20 dpi. The results strongly indicated that in the examined pigs, the specific IgG response against T. spiralis infection is dose dependent. Furthermore, it was shown that the high infectious dose induced earlier increasing of specific IgG response. Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between OD values obtained in procedures based on the three antigens. The results were statistically repeatable for procedures and for single pigs (P<0.01).

Słowa kluczowe

PL

analiza statystyczna; diagnostyka weterynaryjna; pasozyty; nicienie; Warszawa konferencja; otrzymywanie; procedury; trzoda chlewna; zwierzeta chore; parazytologia; Trichinella spiralis; konferencje; antygeny; wartosc diagnostyczna; test ELISA

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Wiadomości Parazytologiczne
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: s.219-230,tab.,wykr.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bien J

• Instytut Parazytologii PAN, ul.Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa

Bibliografia

• [1] Dupouy-Camet J. 2000. Trichinellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93: 191-200.
• [2] Pozio E. 2001. New patterns of Trichinella infection. Veterinary Parasitology 98: 133-148.
• [3] Ramisz A., Szymborski J., Balicka-Ramisz A. 1997. Epidemiological and epizootiological problems of trichinellosis in Poland. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 43: 297-301.
• [4] Ramisz A., Szymborski J., Balicka-Ramisz A. 2001. Trichinellosis in swine and wilde boars in Poland from 1993-1998. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 47: 233-235.
• [5] Gołąb E., Sadowska-Todys M. 2003: Współczesne problemy epidemiologii i diagnostyki włośnicy w krajach Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce. Przegląd Epidemiologiczny 57: 561-570.
• [6] Cabaj W., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Malczewski A. 2004. Włośnica u zwierząt wolno żyjących i świń w Polsce. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 60: 80-83.
• [7] Gamble H.R., Pozio E., Bruschi F., Nöckler K., Kapel C.M.O., Gajadhar A.A. 2004. International Commission on Trichinellosis: recommendations on the use of serological tests for the detection of Trichinella infection in animals and man. Parasite 11: 3-13.
• [8] Oliver D.G., Singh P., Allison D.E. 1988. Trichina detection techniques as applied to a high-speed slaughterhouse environment. Agri Practice 6: 45-48.
• [9] Murrell K.D., Anderson W.R., Schad G.A., Hanbury R.D., Kazacos K.R., Brown J., Gamble H.R., 1986. Field evaluation of the ELISA test for swine trichinosis: efficacy of the excretory-secretory antigen. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 1046-1049.
• [10] van der Leek M.L., Dame J.B., Adams C.L., Gillis K., Littell R.C. 1992. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of trichinellosis in swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53: 877-882.
• [11] Bradford M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of the protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
• [12] Pozio E., Sofronic-Milosavljevic L., Gomez-Morales M.A., Boireau P., Nöckler K. 2002. Evaluation of ELISA and Western Blot Analysis using three antigens to detect anti-Trichinella IgG in horses. Veterinary Parasitology 108: 163-178.
• [13] Chapa-Ruiz M.R., Salinas-Tobon M.R., MartinezMaranon R., Cedillo R., Garcia-Latorre E. 1989. Diagnosis of human trichinellosis by indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia 31: 136-139.
• [14] www. infecepi.unizar.es/pages/ratio/soft_sp.htm
• [15] Greiner M., Gardner I.A., 2000. Epidemiological issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 45: 3-22.
• [16] Gajadhar A.A., Gamble H.R. 2000. Historical perspectives and current global challenges of Trichinella and trichinellosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93: 183-189.
• [17] www. med.unipi.it/ict/statursp.html
• [18] www.pzh.gov.pl/biblioteka/index.html#5
• [19] Cabaj W., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Bień J. 2005. Włośnica u zwierząt wolno żyjących stałym zagrożeniem zdrowia ludzi w Polsce. Kosmos 54: 95-103.
• [20] van Knapen F., Franchimot J.H., Ruitenberg E.J., Baldelli B., Gibson T.E., Gottal C., Henriksen S.A., Köhler G., Skovgaard N., Soule C., Taylor S.M. 1980. Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with three other methods for the detection of Trichinella spiralis infections in pigs. Veterinary Parasitology 7: 109-121.
• [21] Gamble H.R. 1996. Trichinellosis. In: OIE, Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. List A and B Diseases of Mammals, Birds and Bees. Office International des Epizooties, Paris: 477-480.
• [22] Nöckler K., Pozio E., Voigt W.P., Heidrich J. 2000. Detection of Trichinella infection in food animals. Veterinary Parasitology 93: 335-350.
• [23] Ruitenberg E.J., Steerenberg P.A., Brosi B.J.M., Buys J. 1974. Serodiagnosis of Trichinella spiralis infections in pigs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Bulletin WHO 51: 108-109.
• [24] Ruitenberg E.J., Steerenberg P.A., Brosi B.J.M., Buys J. 1976. Reliability of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis infections in conventionally raised pigs. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 101: 57-68.
• [25] Ruitenberg E.J., van Knapen F. 1977. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a diagnostic method for Trichinella spiralis infections in pigs. Veterinary Parasitology 3: 317-326.
• [26] Gamble H.R., Anderson W.R., Graham C.E., Murrell K.D. 1983. Diagnosis of swine trichinellosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an excretory-secretory antigen. Veterinary Parasitology 13: 349-361.
• [27] Whiting P., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., Glas A.S., Bossuyt P.M., Kleijnen J. 2004. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 140: 189-202.
• [28] Greiner M., Pfeiffer D., Smith R.D. 2000. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 45: 23-41.
• [29] Nöckler K., Serrano F.J., Boireau P., Kapel C.M.O., Pozio E. 2005. Experimental studies in pigs on Trichinella detection in different diagnostic matrices. Veterinary Parasitology 132: 85-90.
• [30] Serrano F., Perez E., Reina D., Navarrete I. 1992. Trichinella strain, pig race and other parasitic infections as factors in the reliability of ELISA for the detection of swine trichinellosis. Parasitology 105: 111-115.
• [31] Zarlenga D.S., Gamble H.R. 1990. Molecular cloning and expression of an immunodominant 53-kDa excretory-secretory antigen from T. spiralis muscle larvae. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 42: 165-174.
• [32] Kapel C.M.O., Webster P., Lind P., Henriksen S., Murrell K.D., Nansen P. 1998: Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi and T. nativa: infectivity, larval distribution in muscle, and antibody response after experimental infection in pigs. Parasitology Research 84: 264-271.
• [33] Smith H.J. 1987. Evaluation of the ELISA for the serological diagnosis of trichinosis in Canadian swine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 5: 194-197.
• [34] Smith H.J. 1988. Comparison of pepsin-digestion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of trichinosis in swine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 63-66.
• [35] Sprawozdanie z wyników urzędowego badania zwierząt rzeźnych, mięsa, drobiu, dziczyzny i królików za rok 2003. GIW 2003.
• [36] Sprawozdanie z wyników urzędowego badania zwierząt rzeźnych, mięsa, drobiu, dziczyzny i królików za rok 2004. GIW 2004.