Organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis induced in petal cultures of Sedum species

• Autorzy: Wojciechowicz M K
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Plant regeneration was studied in petal cultures of three Sedum species: S. aizoon, S. spectabile and S. gracile. The course of morphogenesis was examined by light and electron microscopy. Histological examination revealed that morphogenesis took place as direct organogenesis, indirect organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis, depending on the species and the concentrations of growth regulators in the medium. Initial petals and explants from cultures were studied to determine the origin of organogenesis. Petal histology showed that all cells at the time of culture initiation were differentiated. Epidermal and parenchymatous cells were highly vacuolated and the parenchyma contained chloroplasts with starch grains. TEM revealed that cell dedifferentiation occurred in culture under the influence of BAP and IBA. In petal culture the first cell division started subepidermally on day 2 of culture initiation. Epidermal cells underwent regular anticlinal divisions on day 3 of culture initiation, as confirmed by histology and SEM. Direct formation of adventitious buds in petals was observed in meristematic cells dedifferentiated from the epidermis and parenchyma. In indirect organogenesis, callus tissue resulted from division of dedifferentiated parenchyma cells. Somatic embryos were formed directly from subepidermal parenchymatous cells.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

organogenesis; Sedum aizoon; callus; petal culture; ornamental plant; electron microscopy; light microscopy; adventitious bud; somatic embryo; plant regeneration; Sedum; Sedum gracile; somatic embryogenesis; Sedum spectabile

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.83-90,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wojciechowicz M K

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Andry H, Yamamoto T, and Inoue M. 2005. Effectiveness of hydrated lime and artificial zeolite amendments and sedum (Sedum sediforme) plant cover in controlling soil erosion from an acid soil. HortScience 40: 659-664.
• Bennici A. 1974. Cytological analysis of roots, shoots and plants regenerated from suspension and solid in vitro cultures of haploid Pelargonium. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 72: 199-205.
• Biautti M, Gimelli F, Venturo R, Bogani P, and Picconi T. 1986. Interclonal variability induced in vitro and in vivo propagation in vegetatively propagated plant, the carnation. In: Semal S. [ed.], Somaclonal Vvariations and Crop Improvement, 251-256. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht NL.
• Brandao I, and Salema R. 1977. Callus and plantlets development from cultured leaf explants of Sedum telephium L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiology 85: 1-8.
• Bush SR, Ealre ED, and Langhans LW. 1976. Plantlets from petal segments, petal epidermis, and shoot tips of the periclinal chimera, Chrysanthemum morifolium 'Indianapolis'. American Journal of Botany 63: 729-737.
• Chengalrayan K, Hazra S, and Gallo-Meagher M. 2001. Histological analysis of somatic embryogenesis induced from mature zygotic embryo-derived leaflets of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Science 161: 415-421.
• Durhman AK, and Rowe DB. 2006. Effect of watering regimen on chlorophyll fluorescence and growth of selected green roof plant taxa. HortScience 41: 1525-1715.
• Esau C. 1973. The flower. In: Esau C [ed.], Plant Anatomy, 530-576. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
• Fisher M, Ziv M, and Vainstein A. 1993. An efficient method for adventitious shoot regeneration from cultured carnation petals. Scientia Horticulture 53: 231-237.
• Fujii Y, and Shimizu K. 1990. Regeneration of plants from achenes and petals of Chrysanthemum coccineum. Plant Cell Reports 8: 625-627.
• Getter KL, and Rowe BD. 2006. The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development. HortScience 41: 1101-1366.
• Gudrupa I, Kruzmane D, and Ievnish G. 2002. Effect of CCC and pH condition on shoot elongation of Sedum rubrotinctum R. T. Clausen. Plant Science 163: 647-651.
• Heuser CW, and Apps DA. 1976. In vitro plantlet formation from flower petal explants of Hemerocallis cv. Chipper Cherry. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 616-618.
• Humprey CD. and Pittman FE. 1974. A simple methylene blue azure II basic fuchsin stain for epoxy-embedment tissue sections. Stain Technology 42: 9-14.
• Jensen WA. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco and London.
• Kakehi M. 1979. Studies on the tissue culture of carnation induction of dedifferentiated plant from petal tissue. Bulletin of Hiroshima Agricultural College 6: 159-166.
• Karam NS, and Al-Matahoub M. 2000. In vitro regeneration from mature tissue of wild Cyclamen persicum Mill. Scientia Horticulture 86: 323-333.
• Mandal AKA, and Datta SK. 2005. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from ray florets of chrysanthemum. Biologia Plantarum 49: 29-33.
• Miller RM, Kaul V, Hutchinson JF, Mahesvaran G, and Richards D. 1991. Shoot regeneration from fragmented flower buds of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Annals of Botany 68: 563-568.
• Monterusso MA. Rowe DB, and Rugh CL. 2005. Establishment and persistence of Sedum spp. and native taxa for green roof applications. HortScience 40: 277-500.
• Murali S, Sreedhar D, and Lokeswari TS. 1996. Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from petals-derived calli of Rosa hybrida L. cv Arizona (hybrid tea). Euphytica 91: 271-275.
• Murashige T, and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-479.
• Noriega C, and Sondahl M. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in hybrid tea roses. Bio/Technology 9: 991-993.
• Nugent G, Wardley-Richardson T, and Lu CH. 1991. Plant regeneration from stem and petal of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Plant Cell Reports 10: 477-480.
• Rout GR, Mohapatra A, and Mohan Jain S. 2006. Tissue culture of ornamental pot plant. A critical review on present scenario and future prospects. Biotechnology Advances 24: 531-560.
• Schepper S, Leus L, Eeckhaut T, Debergh P, Bockstaele E, and Loose M. 2004. Somatic polyploid petals: regeneration offers new road for breeding Belgian pot azaleas. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 76: 183-188.
• Simard H, Michaux-Ferriere N, and Silvy A. 1992. Variations of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) obtained by organogenesis from irradiated petals. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 29: 37-42.
• Spurr AR. 1969. A low-viscosity embedding medium for electron microscopy. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 23: 31-43.
• Stephenson R. 1994 [ed.]. Sedum, Cultivated Stonecrops. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
• Teixeira da Silva JA, 2004. Ornamental chrysanthemums: Improvement by biotechnology. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79: 1-18.
• Torne JM, Rodriquez P, Manich A, Claparolos I, and Santos MA. 1997. Embryogenesis induction in petals of Araujia sericifera. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 51: 95-102.
• Uhring J. 1983. Propagation of Sedum and Myrtus cultivars. HortScience 18: 6.
• Vazques AM, and Short KC. 1978. Morphogenesis in cultured floral parts of African violet. Journal of Experimental Botany 29: 1265-1271.
• van Woert ND, Rowe DB, Andresen JA, Rugh CL, and Xiao LD. 2005. Watering regime and green roof substrate design affect Sedum plant growth. HortScience 40: 659-664.
• Wilmink A, van de Ven BCA, Custers JBM, Nöllen Y, and Dons JJM. 1995. Adventitious shoot formation in tulip; histological analysis and response to selective agents. Plant Science 110: 155-164.
• Wojciechowicz MK. 2007. Comparison of regenerative potential of petals, stamens and pistils of five Sedum species in vitro. Biodiversity, Research and Conservation 5-8: 87-94.
• Yoon ES, Jeong JH, and Choi YE. 2002. Recovery of Basta resistant Sedum erytrostichum via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Reports 21: 70-75.