Differences in foraging behaviour between water shrews: Neomys anomalus and Neomys fodiens

• Autorzy: Rychlik L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The modes and efficiency of foraging in the terrestrial and aquatic habitats in water shrews Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 and N. fodiens (Pennant, 1771) were compared in order to investigate if these species can avoid competition for food when they occur syntopically. Seven individuals of N. anomalus and five of N. fodiens, caught in the Białowieża Primeval Forest, were tested individually in the terrarium of size 3 x 0.5 m, containing a 0.25-m-wide 'stream' with flowing water of an average depth 25 cm. Six experimental variants, simulating different habitat conditions, were established. Each animal was tested in a given variant during 3 succeeding days for 6 h a day. In total, 738 h of shrews' behaviour were recorded in darkness using 2 infra-red sensitive video-cameras. Results obtained on four N. fodiens tested with similar methods (648 h; Ruthardt 1990) were included for comparison. N. anomalus swam and dived significantly shorter than N. fodiens, and they did not take food under water, even when there was no food on land. N. fodiens found and took food placed under water and foraged quite efficiently here. They found on average 17.7% of food portions placed under water in the most similar to natural conditions and 19.4% when there was no food on land. In both species foraging time on land was much longer than in water. The presence of natural structures increased duration and efficiency of foraging, but this influence was stronger in N. anomalus than in N. fodiens. These results and literature data suggest that in the wild: (1) both species forage in shallow water and in muddy grounds of wet habitats (wading foraging mode), and also in drier terrestrial habitats (epigeal and hypogeal foraging); (2) only N. fodiens forage in deep water (aquatic foraging); (3) the competition for food between N. anomalus and N. fodiens may be very weak, when potential aquatic prey are available.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

behaviour; Neomys fodiens; shrew; microhabitat preference; foraging behaviour; aquatic habitat; searching strategy; food; water shrew; Neomys anomalus; competition

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1997
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.351-386,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Rychlik L.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland, E-mail: [e-mail]

Bibliografia

• Andéra M. 1993. Distribution of the Miller's water shrew (Neomys anomalus) in Czechoslovakia. Folia Musei Rerum Naturalium Bohemiae Occidentalis, Zoologica 37: 1-37.
• Andéra M. 1995. The status and conservation needs of the Miller's water shrew (Neomys anomalus) in the Czech Republic. Jin: Proceedings of the "Seminar on the biology and conservation of European desmans and water shrews (Galemys pyrenaicus, Desmana moschata, Neomys spp.), Ordesa, Spain, 7-11 June 1995], Council of Europe, Strasbourg, T-PVS (95) 32: 41-43.
• Arditi R. and Dacorogna B. 1988. Optimal foraging on arbitrary food distributions and the definition of habitat patches. American Naturalist 131: 837-846.
• Aulak W. 1970. Small mammal communities of the Białowieża National Park. Acta Theriologica 15: 465-515.
• Bąkowski C. and Kozakiewicz M. 1988. The effect of forest road on bank vole and yellow-necked mouse populations. Acta Theriologica 33: 345-353.
• Barnard C. J. and Brown C. A. J. 1985a. Risk-sensitive foraging in common shrews (Sorex araneus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16: 161-164.
• Barnard C. J. and Brown C. A. J. 1985b. Competition affects risk-sensitivity in foraging shrews (Sorex araneus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17: 379-382.
• Barnard C. J. and Brown C. A. J. 1987. Risk-sensitive foraging and patch residence time in common shrews, Sorex araneus L. Animal Behaviour 35: 1255-1257.
• Barnard C. J., Brown C. A. J., Houston A. 1. and McNamara J. M. 1985. Risk-sensitive foraging in common shrews: an interruption model and the effects of mean and variance in reward rate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18: 139-146.
• Bemmel A. C. van and Voesenek L, A, C. J. 1984. The home range of Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771) in the Netherlands. Lutra 27: 148-153.
• Borowski S. and Dehnel A. 1952. IMaterials on biology of Soricidae). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Skłodowska, Sectio C 7: 305-448. [In Polish with Russian and German summaries]
• Brewster R. W. 1966. Hunting behaviour of the water shrew. Essex Nature 31: 377-378.
• Brown J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, prédation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22: 37-48.
• Brown J. S. and Mitchell W. A. 1989. Diet selection on depletable resources. Oikos 54: 33-43.
• Buchalczyk A. 1972. Seasonal variations in activity of shrews. Acta Theriologica 17: 221-243.
• Buchalczyk T. and Pucek Z. 1963. Food storage of the European water shrew Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771). Acta Theriologica 7: 376-379.
• Buckner C. H. 1970. Direct observation of shrew prédation on insect and fish. Blue Jay 28: 171-172.
• Butterfield J., Coulson J. C. and Wanless S. 1981. Studies on the distribution, food, breeding biology and relative abundance of the pygmy and common shrews (Sorex minutus and S. araneus) in upland areas of northern England. Journal of Zoology, London 195: 169-180.
• Cantoni D. 1990. Etude en milieu naturel de l'organisation sociale de trois especes de musaraignes, Crocidura russula, Sorex coronatus et Neomys fodiens (Mammalia, Insectívora, Soricidae). These de Doctorat, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne: 1-157 + 5.
• Cantoni D. 1993. Social and spatial organization of free-ranging shrews, Sorex coronatus and Neomys fodiens (Insectívora, Mammalia). Animal Behaviour 45: 975 -995.
• Castién E. 1995. The diet of Neomys fodiens in the Spanish western Pyrenees. Folia Zoologica 44: 297-303.
• Churchfield J. S. 1979. A note on the diet of the European water shrew, Neomys fodiens bicolor. Journal of Zoology, London 188: 294-296.
• Churchfield S. 1980. Subterranean foraging and burrowing activity of the common shrew. Acta Theriologica 25: 451-459.
• Churchfield S. 1984. Dietary separation in three species of shrew inhabiting water-cress beds. Journal of Zoology, London 204: 211-228.
• Churchfield S. 1985. The feeding ecology of the water shrew. Mammal Review 15: 13-21.
• Churchfield S. 1988. Shrews of the British Isles. Shire Natural History 30: 1-24.
• Churchfield S. 1990. The natural history of shrews. Christopher Helm, London: 1-192.
• Churchfield S. 1991. Niche dynamics, food resources, and feeding strategies in muttispecies com­munities of shrews. [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J, S. Findley and T. L, Yates, eds]. The Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 23-34.
• Churchfield S. 1993. Foraging strategies of shrews: interactions between small predators and their prey. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 65: 235-252.
• Churchfield S. 1994. Foraging strategies of shrews, and the evidence from field studies. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds|. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 77-87.
• Churchfield S. and Sheftel B. I. 1994. Food niche overlap and ecological separation in a multi-species community of shrews in the Siberian taiga. Journal of Zoology, London 234: 105-124.
• Churchfield S., Sheftel B. I., Moraleva N. V. and Shvarts E. A. 1997. Habitat occurrence and prey distribution of a multi-species community of shrews in the Siberian taiga. Journal of Zoology, London 241: 55-71.
• Clark. B. K. and Kaufman D. W. 1991. Effects of plant litter on foraging and nesting behavior of prairie rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 502-512.
• Conaway C. H. 1952. Life history of the water shrew (Sorex palustris navigator). American Midland Naturalist 48: 219-248.
• Cranbrook E. of. 1959. The feeding habits of the water-shrew, Neomys fodiens bicolor Shaw, in captivity and the effect of its attack upon its prey. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 133: 245-249.
• Croin Michielsen N. 1966. Intraspecific and interspecific competition in the shrews Sorex araneus L. and S. minutus L. Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie 17: 73-174.
• Crowcroft P. 1957. The life of the shrew. Max Reinhardt, London: 1-166.
• Crowcroft W. P. 1955. Notes on the behaviour of shrews. Behaviour 8: 63-80.
• Davis W. B. and Joeris L. 1945. Notes on the life-history of the little short-tailed shrew. Journal of Mammalogy 26: 136-138.
• Dehnel A. 1950. Studies on the genus Neomys Kaup. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio C 5: 1-63. [In Polish with Russian and English summaries]
• DuPasquier A. and Cantoni D. 1992. Shifts in benthic macroinvertebrate community and food habits of water shrew, Neomys fodiens (Soricidae, Insectívora). Acta OEcologica 13: 81-99.
• Ellenbroek F. J. M. 1990. An experimental analysis of interspecific competition in the shrews Sorex araneus L. and S. minutus L. (Soricidae, Insectivora). Ph D thesis, University of Leiden. H. Gianotten, Tilburg: 1-125.
• Fox B. J. and Kirkland G. L. Jr. 1992. An assembly rule for functional groups applied to North American soricid communities. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 491-503.
• French T. W. 1984. Dietary overlap of Sorex longirostris and S. cinereus in hardwood floodplain habitats in Vigo County, Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 11: 41-46.
• Gorner M. and Hackethal H. 1987. Sáugetiere Europas. Neumann Verlag Leipzig, Radebeul: 66-67.
• Grainger J. P. and Fairley J. S. 1978. Studies on the biology of the pygmy shrew, Sorex minutus, in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology, London 186: 109-141.
• Greń J. 1982. ¡Mathematical statistics. Models and exercises!. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw: 1-363. [In Polish]
• Gureev A. A. 1971. IShrews (Soricidae) of the world faunai. Izdatiel'stvo "Nauka", Leningradskoe Otdelenie, Leningrad: 1-256. [In Russian]
• Gureev A. A. 1979. [Insectivours (Mammalia, Insectivora). Hedgehogs, moles and shrews (Erinaceidae, Talpidae, Soricidae)|. Izdatiel'stvo "Nauka", Leningradskoe Otdelenie, Leningrad: 1-503. [In Russian!
• Hamilton W. J. 1944. The biology of the little short-tailed shrew Cryptotis parva. Journal of Mammalogy 25: 1-7.
• Hanski I. 1985. What does a shrew do in an energy crisis? [In: Behavioural ecology. R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith, edsl. Symposia of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell, Oxford: 247-252.
• Hanski I. 1989. Habitat selection in a patchy environment: individual differences in common shrews. Animal Behaviour 38: 414-422.
• Hawes M. L. 1977. Home range, territoriality, and ecological separation in sympatric shrews Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus. Journal of Mammalogy 58: 354-367.
• Hawkins A. E. and Jewell P. A. 1962. Food consumption and energy requirements of captive British shrews and the mole. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 138: 137—155.
• Holling C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of the small mammal predation of European sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 41: 293-332.
• Hutterer R. 1985. Anatomical adaptations of shrews. Mammal Review 15: 43-55.
• Illing K.t Illing R. and Kraft R. 1981. Freilandbeobachtungen zur Lebensweise und zum Revier­verhalten der Europäischen Wasserspitzmaus, Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771). Zoologische Beiträge 27: 109-122.
• Innes D. G. L. 1994. Life histories of the Soricidae: a review. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 111-136.
• Jancewicí E. 1995. [Prey preferences of four shrew species co-habiting in wet habitats of the Białowieża Primeval Forest]. M Sc thesis, University of Agriculture, Warszawa: 1-44. [In Polish]
• Kaufman D. W. and Kaufman G. A. 1990. Influence of plant titter on patch use by foraging Peromyscus maniculatus and Reithrodontomys megalotis. American Midland Naturalist 124: 195-198.
• Kirkland G. L. Jr 1991. Competition and coexistence in shrews (Insectívora, Soricidae). [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, edsj. Special Publication, The Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 15-22.
• Kirkland G. L. Jr and Van Deusen H. M. 1979. The shrews of the Sorex dispar group: Sorex dispar Batchelder and Sorex gaspensis Anthony and Goodwin. American Museum Novitates 2675: 1-21.
• Köhler D. 1993. On the learning of the position of underwater food sources by Neomys fodiens (Mammalia, Soricidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 231: 73-81.
• Köhler D. 1996. Umwegversuche mit tauchenden Wasserspitzmäusen (Neomys fodiens) (Mammalia: Soricidae). Bonner zoologische Beiträge 46: 315-325.
• Kraft R. and Pleyer G. 1978. Zur Ernährungsbiologie der Europäischen Wasserspitzmaus, Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771), an Fischteichen. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 43: 321-330.
• Krushinska N. L. and Pucek Z. 1989. Ethological study of sympatric species of European water shrews. Acta Theriologica 34: 269-285.
• Krushinska N. L. and Rychlik L. 1993. Intra- and interspecific antagonistic behaviour in two sympatric species of water shrews: Neomys fodiens and N. anomalus. Journal of Ethology 11: 11-21.
• Krushinska N. L., Rychlik L. and Pucek Z. 1994. Agonistic interactions between resident and immigrant sympatric water shrews: Neomys fodiens and N. anomalus. Acta Theriologica 39: 227-247.
• Krystufek B. and Petkovski S. 1989. Distribution of water shrews (gen. Neomys Kaup, 1829, Insectívora, Mammalia) in Macedonia. Fragmenta Balcanica 14: 107-116.
• Kuvikova A. 1985a. The food of some species of the family Soricidae (Insectívora) in the alder forest of the Jursky sur wetland. Biologia (Bratislava) 40: 181-187. [In Slovak with English abstract!
• Kuvikova A. 1985b. Zur Nahrung der Wasserspitzmaus, Neomys fodiens, in der Slowakei. Biologia (Bratislava) 40: 563-572.
• Kuvikova A. 1987. Zur Nahrung der Sumpfspitzmaus Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 (Insectívora, Soricidae) in der Slowakei. Lynx (Praha) 23: 55-62.
• Kuznetzov V. I. 1972. On the ecology of Crocidura suaueolens and Diplomesodon pulchellum Licht, in the Kara Kum desert. Teriologiya I, Novosibirsk 1: 266—276. [In Russian with English summary]Lardet J.-P. 1987. Contribution à l'étude de quelques aspects de la stratégie énergétique de la musaraigne aquatique, Neomys fodiens (Mammifères, Insectivores). These de Doctorat, Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Lausanne, Lausanne: 1-142.
• Lardet J.-P. 1988. Spatial behaviour and activity patterns of the water shrew, Neomys fodiens in the field. Acta Theriologica 33: 293-303.
• Lorenz K. Z. 1952. The taming of the shrew. |In: King Salomon's ring. New light on animal ways. Lorenz K. Z,, edj. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London: 92-113.
• Michalak I. 1982. Reproduction and behaviour of the Mediterranean water shrew under laboratory conditions. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 30: 307-310.
• Neet C. R. 1989. ¡Evaluation of interspecific territoriality between Sorex araneus and S. coronatus in a zone of syntopy (Insectívora, Soricidae)]. Mammalia 53: 329-336.
• Neet C. R. and Hausser J. 1990, Habitat selection in zones parapatric contact between the common shrew Sorex araneus and Millet's shrew S. coronatus. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 235-250.
• Niethammer J. 1977. Ein syntopes Vorkommen der Wasserspitzmäuse Neomys fodiens und Neomys anomalus. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 42: 1-6.
• Niethammer J. 1978. Weitere Beobachtungen über Wasserspitzmäuse der Arten Neomys fodiens und N. anomalus. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 43: 313-321.
• Pernetta J. C. 1973. The ecology of Crocidura suaveolens cassiteridum (Hintom) in a coastal habitat. Mammalia 37: 241-256.
• Pernetta J. C. 1976a. Diets of the shrews Sorex araneus L. and Sorex minutus L. in Wytham grassland. Journal of Animal Ecology 45: 899-912.
• Pernetta J. C. 1976b. A note on the prédation of smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris by European water-shrew, Neomys fodiens bicolor. Journal of Zoology, London 179: 215-216.
• Pernetta J. C. 1977. Anatomical and behavioural specialisations of shrews in relation to their diet, Canadian Journal of Zoology 55: 1442-1453.
• Pierce G. J. 1987. Search paths of foraging common shrews Sorex araneus. Animal Behaviour 35: 1215-1224.
• Pucek Z. (ed) 1984. IKeys to vertebretes of Poland. Mammals]. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw: 74-80. [In Polish]
• Ramalhinho M. G. 1995. Preliminary account of the biology of Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 in Portugal. [In: Proceedings of the "Seminar on the biology and conservation of European desmans and water shrews (Galemys pyrenaicus, Desmana moschata, Neomys spp,), Ordesa, Spain, 7-11 June 1995|. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, T-PVS (95) 32: 63-66.
• Ruthardt M. 1990. Ein öko-ethologischer Ansatz zur Erklärung der semiaquatischen Lebensweise der Wasserspitzmaus (Neomys fodiens Pennant, 1771), Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück: 1-251.
• Ruthardt M. and Schröpfer R, 1985. Zum Verhalten der Wasserspitzmaus Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771) unter Wasser. Zeitschrift für angewandte Zoologie 72: 49-57.
• Rychlik L. 1995. Differences in foraging behaviour between Neomys anomalus and N. fodiens. Ph D thesis, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mammal Research Institute, Białowieża: 1-71 + 35. ¡In Polish with English summary]
• Rychlik L, and Jancewicz E. 1996. [Differences in prey preferences of four shrew species co-habiting in wet habitats]. [In: Proceedings of the "Polish Theriological Conference - Puszczykowo '96", 23-26.05.1996], University of Poznań, Poznań: 24-25. |In Polish]
• Saarikko J. 1989. Foraging behaviour of shrews. Annales Zoologici Fenntci 26: 411-423.
• Sawyer F. E. 1946. Further studies of the water shrew. Journal of Society for the Preservation of the Fauna of the Empire 54: 38-40.
• Schloeth R. 1980. Freilandbeobachtungen an der Wasserpitzmaus Neomys fodiens (Pennant, 1771), im Schweizerischen Nationalpark. Revue suisse Zoolgie 87: 937-940.
• Schröpfer R. 1985. Ufergebundenes Verhalten und Habitatselektion bei der Wasserspitzmaus Neomys fodiens (Pennent, 1771), Zeitschrift für angewandte Zoologie 72: 37-48.
• Sheftel B. I. 1994. Spatial distribution of nine species of shrews in the central Siberian taiga. (In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, edsl. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 45-55.
• Spencer-Both Y. 1963. A coastal population of shrews (Crocidura suaueolens cassiteridum). Pro­ceedings of the Zoological Society of London 140: 322—326.
• Spitzenberger F. 1980. Sumpf- und Wasserspitzmaus (Neomys anomalus Cabera, 1907 und Neomys fodiens Pennant, 1771) in Österreich. Mittelungen der Abteilung für Zoologie der Landesmus Joanneum 9: 1-39.
• Spitzenberger F. 1990. Gattung Neomys Kaup, 1829. [In: Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Insektenfresser-Herrentiere. Band 3/1. J. Niethamer and F. Krapp, eds). Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden: 313-374.
• Stewart D. T., Herman T. B. and Teferi T. 1989. Littoral feeding in a high-density insular population of Sorem cirwreus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 2074-2077.
• SYSTAT V5. 1992. Systat for Windows: Version 5 Edition. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.
• Terry C. J. 1981, Habitat differentiation among three species of Sorex and Neurotrichus gibbsii in Washington. American Midland Naturalist 106: 119-125.
• Tupikova N. V. 1949. [The diet and nature of daily cycle of activity of shrews from central region of U.S.S.R.I. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 28: 561-572. [In Russian]
• Voesenek L. A. C. J. and Bemmel A. C. van. 1984. Intra- and interspecific competition in the water shrew in the Netherlands. Acta Theriologica 29: 297-301.
• Vogel P., Bodmer C., Spreng M. and Aeschimann J. 1997. Diving capacity and foraging behaviour of the water shrew {Neomys fodiens). ¡In: Behaviour and ecology of riparian mammals. N. Dunstone and M. L. Gorman, eds]. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 71. (in press)
• Whitaker J. O. Jr and Maser C. 1976. Food habits of five western Oregon shrews. Northwestern Scientist 50: 102-107.
• Wölk K. 1976. The winter food of the European water-shrew. Acta Theriologica 21: 117-129.
• Yoshino H. and Abe H. 1984. Comparative study on the foraging habits of two species of soricine shrews. Acta Theriologica 29: 35-43.
• Yudin B. S. 1962. Ecology of shrews (genus Sorex) of western Siberia, USSR. [In: Problems on the ecology, zoogeography and systematica of animals. B. S. Yudin, ed], Nauka, Moskow: 33-134.