PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
1999 | 21 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Chromium and nickel tolerance of Trema orientalis [Blume] L. in tissue culture

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Callus of Trema orientalis derived from both contaminated and uncontaminated sources were tested in vitro for their relative tolerance to chromium and nickel. The calluses derived from contaminated source were metal-tolerant and showed better growth than those obtained from uncontaminated plants. The specificity of metal tolerance shown by the parent material was maintained in the calluses. Compared to the uncontaminated explants, the calli derived from contaminated sources exhibited higher catalase and peroxidase activities but a reduced acid phosphatase activity. Biochemical studies, provided evidence that the contaminated sources were physiologically distinct from the uncontaminated ones. Thus, this study indicated that seeds of Trema orientalis collected from contaminated sites were tolerant to chromium and nickel, and may have the advantage of being used in sustainable revegetation programmes on chromiferous minewastes.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

21

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.27-35,fig.

Twórcy

autor
  • Regional Plant Resource Centre, Bhubaneswar-751015, India
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Anonymous 1970. Aminoacid content of foods & Biological Data on proteins. FAO nutritional studies No. 24, Rome, Italy.
  • Archambault D.J., Winterhalder, K. 1995. Metal tolerance in Agrostis scabra from the Sudbury, Ontario, area. Can. J. Bot. 73:766–775.
  • Baker A. J. M. 1987. Metal tolerance. New Phytol. 106 (Suppl.): 93–111.
  • Bradford M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensetive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254.
  • Bradshaw A.D. 1977. The evolution of heavy metal tolerance and its significance in land reclamation. In: Heavy metals and the Environment (Ed. Hutchinson, T.C.), Toronto University Press, Toronto.
  • Bradshaw A.D, Humphreys M.O, Johnson M.S. 1978. The value of heavy metal tolerance in the revegetation of metalliferous mine wastes. In: Environmental management of mineral wastes. Ed. by Goodman, G.T., Chadwick, M.J.), pp 311–334, Sijthoff and Noordhoff publ., The Netherlands.
  • Brown P.H., Welch R.M, Cary, E.E. 1987. Nickel: A micronutrient essential for higher plants. Plant Physiol. 85:801–803.
  • Christiansen M.N. 1974. Organisation and conduct of plant stress research to increase agricultural productivity. In: Stress physiology in crop plants. ed. by Mussel H, Staples R.C., pp. 1–14, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Clairmont K.B., Hugar W.G, Davis E.A. 1986 Manganese toxicity to chlorophyll synthesis in tobacco callus. Plant Physiol. 80:291–293.
  • DeVos C.H.R., Schat H. 1991. Free radicles and heavy metal tolerance. In: Ecological responses to Environmental stress. ed. by Rozema, J, Verkleij, J.A.C, pp.22–30, Doredrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
  • Gartside D.W., Mc Neilly, T. 1974. Genetic studies in heavy metal tolerant plants. II. Zinc tolerance in Agrostis tenuis. Heredity 33:303–308.
  • Gregory R.P.G., Bradshaw A.D. 1965. Heavy metal tolerance in populations of Agrostis tenuis Sibth. and other grasses. New Phytol, 64:131–143.
  • Lepp N.W. 1981. Effects of heavy metal pollution of plants. Vol. 1&2; Applied Science Publishers, London.
  • Maehly A.C., Chance B. 1967. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. In: Methods of biochemical analysis. ed. by Glick D., Vol. I, pp. 357–427, Intorscience Publishers, New York.
  • Marsh K.B., Peterson L.A. 1990. Gradients in Mn accumulation and changes in plant form for potato plants affected by Mn toxicity. Plant and Soil, 121:157–163.
  • Meredith C.P. 1978. Response of cultured tomato cells to aluminium. Plant Sci. Lett. 12, 17–24.
  • Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497.
  • Nabors M.W. 1990. Environmental stress resistance. In: Plant Cell Line Selection. ed. by Dix P.J, pp. 167–186, VCH, Weinheim.
  • Nashikkar V.J., Chakrabarti T. 1994. Catalase and peroxidase activity in plants - an indicator of heavy metal toxicity. Ind. J. Expt. Biol., 32:520–521.
  • Ojima K., Ohira K. 1982. Characterisation and regeneration of an aluminium- tolerant variant from carrot cell cultures. In: Plant Tissue Culture, Proceedings of the fifth international congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, ed. by Fujiwara A, pp. 475–476. Japanese Association of Plant Tissue Culture, Tokyo.
  • Petolino J.F., Collins G. B. 1985. Manganese toxicity in tobacco (N. tabacum L.) callus and seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 118:139–144.
  • Qureshi J.A., Hamish, H.A., Hardwick, K, Thurman, D.A. 1981. Metal tolerance in tissue cultures of Anthoxanthum odoratum. Plant Cell Reports, 1: 80–82.
  • Samantaray, S. 1991. Studies on the effects of minewastes on the vegetation of the adjoining regions of Sukinda Chromite mine. Ph.D. thesis, Utkal University.
  • Samantaray, S., Rout, G.R, Das P. 1994. An in vitro study on organogenesis in Trema orientalis (Blume) Linn. Plant Science 105:87–94.
  • Tomsett A.B., Thurman D.A. 1988. Molecular biology of metal tolerances of plants. Plant Cell Environ., 11:383–394.
  • Turner R.G. 1969. Heavy metal tolerance in Plants. In: Ecological aspects of the mineral nutrition of plants. ed. by Rorison I.H, pp. 399–410. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Van Assche F. Clijsters H. 1990. Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant Cell and Environ. 13:195–206.
  • Verkleij J.A.C., Lolkema P.C, Neeling De, Harmens H. 1991. Heavy metal resistance, in higher plants: biochemical and genetic aspects. In: Ecological Responses to Environmental Stresses. ed. by Rozema J., Verkleij J.A.C, Kluwer pp. 8–19, Academic Publishers, London.
  • Vernon L.P. 1960. Spectrophotometric determination of chlorophylls and pheophytins in plant extracts. Anal. Chem. 32:1144–1150.
  • Wu, L., Antonovics J. 1978. Zinc and Copper tolerance of Agrostis stolonifera in tissue culture. Amer. J. Bot. 65(3):268–271.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-b9213ec2-e866-4441-8786-9e3c60e85a2c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.