Epigeal movement of the smoky shrew Sorex fumeus following precipitation in ridgetop and streamside habitats

• Autorzy: Brannon M. P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Epigeal movement of smoky shrews Sorex fumeus (Miller, 1895) following pre­cipitation was examined in two habitats with different moisture conditions. Shrews and invertebrates were collected in pitfall traps over several consecutive nights each month from August to November 1996 and from March to August 1997. Capture rates of smoky shrews significantly increased following rainfall at dry ridgetop sites (p = 0.001) but not at moist streamside sites (p = 0.335). In mesic environments, favorable condi­tions on the forest floor not associated with precipitation may increase movements of shrews. Available invertebrate biomass did not increase significantly with rainfall in either habitat type (p = 0.121 and 0.368). Increased surface activity by smoky shrews after rain events is probably related more to their ecophysiology than to increased prey availability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

shrew; smoky shrew; Sorex fumeus; environmental moisture; precipitation; moisture condition

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.363-368,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Brannon M. P.

• Virginia Museum of Natural History, 1001 Douglas Avenue, Martinsville, VA 24112, USA

Bibliografia

• Bellows A. S., Mitchell J. C. and Pagels J. F. 1999. Small mammal assemblages on Fort A. P. Hill, Virginia: habitat associations and patterns of capture success. Banisteria 14: 3-15.
• Brannon M. P. 2000. Niche relationships of two syntopic species of shrews, Sorex fumeus and S. cinereus, in the southern Appalachian mountains. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 1053-1061.
• Buckner C. H. 1964. Metabolism, food capacity, and feeding behavior in four species of shrews. Canadian Journal of Zoology 42: 259-279.
• Chew R. M. 1951. The water exchanges of some small mammals. Ecological Monographs 21: 215-225.
• Churchfield S. 1982. Food availability and the diet of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 51: 15-28.
• Churchfield S. 1990. The natural history of shrews. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York: 1-178.
• Churchfield S. 1991. Niche dynamics, food resources, and feeding strategies in multispecies communities of shrews. [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, eds]. Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 23-34.
• Cudmore W. W. and Whitaker J. O. Jr 1984. The distribution of the smoky shrew, Sorex fumeus, and the pygmy shrew, Microsorex hoyi, in Indiana with notes on the distribution of other shrews. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Sciences 93: 469-474.
• Doucet G. J. and Bider J. R. 1974. The effect of weather on the activity of the masked shrew. Journal of Mammalogy 55: 348-363.
• Fraser D. F. 1976. Empirical evaluation of the hypothesis of food competition in salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Ecology 57: 459-471.
• Getz L. L. 1961. Factors influencing the local distribution of shrews. American Midland Naturalist 65: 67-88.
• Gist C. S. and Crossley D. A. 1975. The litter arthropod community in a southern Appalachian hardwood forest: numbers, biomass and mineral element content. American Midland Naturalist 93: 107-122.
• Hamilton W. J. Jr 1930. The food of the Soricidae. Journal of Mammalogy 11: 26-39.
• Hamilton W. J. Jr 1940. The biology of the smoky shrew. Zoologica 25: 473-492.
• Jaeger R. G. 1980a. Fluctuations in prey availability and food limitation for a terrestrial salamander. Oecologia 44: 335-341.
• Jaeger R. G. 1980b. Microhabitats of a terrestrial forest salamander. Copeia 1980: 265-268.
• Kirkland G. L. Jr 1991. Competition and coexistence in shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae). [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, eds]. Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 15-22.
• Kirkland G. L. Jr and Sheppard P. K. 1994. Proposed standard protocol for sampling small mammal communities. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds]. Special Publication of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 277-283.
• Kirkland G. L. Jr, Sheppard P. K., Shaughnessy M. J. Jr and Woleslagle B. A. 1998. Factors influencing perceived community structure in nearctic forest small mammals. Acta Theriologica 43: 121-135.
• Laerm J., Ford W. M., McCay T. S., Menzel M. A., Lepardo L. T. and Boone J. L. 1999. Soricid communities in the southern Appalachians. [In: Proceedings of the Appalachian biogeography symposium. R. P. Eckerlin, ed]. Special Publication of the Virginia Museum of Natural History No. 7, Martinsville: 177-193.
• McCay T. S. 1996. Response of masked shrews (Sorex cinereus) to precipitation in irrigated and nonirrigated forests. American Midland Naturalist 135: 178-180.
• McCay T. S., Laerm J., Menzel M. A. and Ford W. M. 1998. Methods used to survey shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae) and the importance of forest-floor structure. Brimleyana 25: 110-119.
• McCay T. S. and Storm G. L. 1997. Masked shrew (Sorex cinereus) abundance, diet, and prey selection in an irrigated forest. American Midland Naturalist 138: 268-275.
• McComb W. C. and Rumsey R. L. 1982. Response of small mammals to forest floor clearings created by herbicides in the central Appalachians. Brimleyana 8: 121-134.
• Merritt J. E. and Vessey S. H. 2000. Shrews - small insectivores with polyphasic patterns. [In: Activity patterns in small mammals. S. Halle and N. C. Stenseth, eds]. Ecological Studies Vol. 141, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 235-251.
• Mystkowska E. T. and Sidorowicz J. 1961. Influence of the weather on captures of Micromammalia. II. Insectivora. Acta Theriologica 5: 263-273.
• National Climatic Data Center. 1997. Record of river and climatological observations: Morganton, N. C., Aug. 1996-Aug. 1997. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
• Pankakoski E. 1979. The influence of weather on the activity of the common shrew. Acta Theriologica 24: 522-526.
• Sarrazin J.-P. R. and Bider J. R. 1973. Activity, a neglected parameter in population estimates - the development of a new technique. Journal of Mammalogy 54: 369-382.
• Sites J. W. 1978. The foraging strategy of the dusky salamander, Desmognathus fuscus (Amphibia, Urodela, Plethodontidae): an empirical approach to predation theory. Journal of Herpetology 12: 373-383.
• Vickery W. L. and Bider J. R. 1978. The effect of weather on Sorex cinereus activity. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56: 291-297.
• Whitaker J. E. and Cudmore W. W. 1987. Food and ectoparasites of shrews of south central Indiana with emphasis on Sorex fumeus and Sorex hoyi. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 96: 543-552.
• Whitaker J. E. and French T. W. 1984. Foods of six species of sympatric shrews from New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 622-626.
• Wrigley R. E., Dubois J. E. and Copeland H. W. R. 1979. Habitat abundance, and the distribution of six species of shrews in Manitoba. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 505-520.
• Zar J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey: 1-718.