PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2006 | 58 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Ocena przydatnosci wybranych chromosomalnych markerow do identyfikacji Bacillus anthracis. II. Ocena markerow SSH oraz RPOB

Warianty tytułu

EN
Valuation for usefulness of selected chromosomal markers for Bacillus anthracis identification. II. Valuation for markers SSH and RPOB

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

PL
Zbadano 53 szczepy Gram-ujemnych pałeczek z rodziny Enterobacteriaceae oraz z grupy pałeczek niefermentujących glukozy. Oznaczono fenotypy oporności na antybiotyki aminoglikozydowe metodą dyfuzyjno-krążkową, na podstawie których określono prawdopodobne klasy enzymów (AAC, ANT, APH) modyfikujących aminoglikozydy. Wartości MIC dla czterech podstawowych aminoglikozydów oznaczono za pomocą E-testów. Ponadto określono wrażliwość badanych szczepów na inne antybiotyki.
EN
The aim of the study was to evaluate the aminoglycoside resistance of Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients. To the examination 35 strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 18 of non-fermentative bacteria were included. Resistance to aminoglycosides (gentamicin (G), netilmicin (Nt), tobramycin (T), amikacin (A), kanamycin (K), neomycin (N)) was established by disk diffusion method. Interpretation of enzymatic mechanisms was performed by Livermore. The most common enzymes AAC(6')I were found in Enterobacteriaceae group (mostly in E. cloaceae and P. mirabilis) and ААС(З') and in non-fermentative bacteria: AAC(6')I in P. aeruginosa and APH(3')VI and AAC(3')I in A. baumanii. The most frequent phenotype was resistance to six antibiotics (G, Nt, T, A, K, N) Resistance rates were high for gentamicin (>70 %) in both groups and amikacin (88,89 %) in non-fermentatives.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

58

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

s.355-362,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Panstwowy Zaklad Higieny w Warszawie, ul.Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warszawa
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1. Champion HM, Bennett PM, Lewis DA i inni. Cloning and characterization of an AAC(6') gene from Serratia marcescens. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 22: 587 - 96.
  • 2. Gilbert DN. Aminoglycosides. W: Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Red. G.E. Mandeli, J.E. Bennett, R. Dolin, Churchil Livingstone, New York 2000, 307 - 36.
  • 3. Livermore DM, Winstanley TG, Shannon KP. Interpretative reading: recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48 (Suppl. SI): 87 - 102.
  • 4. Miller GH, Sabatelli FJ, Hare RS i inni. The most frequent aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms - changes with time and geografie area: a reflection of aminoglycoside usage patterns? Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24 (Suppl. 1): 46 - 62.
  • 5. Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens PM. Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 4: 727 - 37.
  • 6. NCCLS (CLSI / Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 15th informational suplement. Approved stadards M2 - A8 and M7 - A6 ( M100 - S15). CLSI 2005. Wayne, Pa.
  • 7. Neonakis I, Gikas A, Scoulica E i inni. Evolution of aminoglycoside resistance phenotypes of four Gram-negative bacteria: an 8-year survey in a University Hospital in Greece. Inter J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 22: 526-31.
  • 8. Nicolau DP, Quintiliani R Jr. Aminoglycosides. W: Antimicrobial therapy and vaccines. Red. V.L. Yu, T.C. Merigan Jr, S.L. Barriere, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1999, 621 - 38.
  • 9. Över U, Gür D, Ünal S i inni. The changing nature of aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms and prevalence of newly recognized resistance mechanisms in Turkey. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001; 7:470 - 8.
  • 10. Philips I, King BA, Shannon KP. The mechanisms of resistance to aminoglycosides in the genus Pseudomonas. J Antimicrob Chemother 1978; 4: 121- 9.
  • 11. Schmitz Ff, Verhoef J, Fluit AC i inni. Prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance in 20 European University Hospitals participating in the European SENTRY antimicrobial surrveillance programme. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18: 414 - 21.
  • 12. Sękowska A, Janicka G, Wojda M i inni. Ocena oporności szczepów Pseudomonas aeruginosa na wybrane antybiotyki. Pol Merk Lek 2005; 110 (XIX): 169 - 71.
  • 13. Shahid M, Malik A. Resistance due to aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burns patients. Indian J Med Res 2005; 122: 324 - 9.
  • 14. Shaw KJ, Rather PN, Hare RS i inni. Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol Rev 1993; 1:138 - 63.
  • 15. Tolmasky ME. Bacterial resistance to aminoglycosides and beta-laktams: the Тn1ЗЗ1 transposon paradigm. Front Biosci 2000; 5: 20 - 9.
  • 16. Vakulenko SB, Mobashery S. Versality of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003; 3: 430 - 50.
  • 17. Vanhoof R, Nyssen HJ, Van Bossuyt E i inni. Aminoglycoside resistance in Gram-negative blood isolates from various hospitals in Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 44: 483 - 8.
  • 18. Wie-feng S, Jian-ping J, Zu-huang M. Relationship between antimicrobial resistance and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene expressions in Acinetobacter baumanii. Chin Med J 2005; 118 (2): 141 - 5.
  • 19. Wright GD. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Curr Opin Microbiol 1999; 2: 499 - 503.
  • 20. Wright GD, Berghuis AM, Mobashery S. Aminoglycoside antibiotics: structure, function and resistance. W: Resolving the antibiotic paradox: Progress in drug design and resistance. Red. B.P. Rosen, S. Mobashery, Plenum Press, New York 1998, 27 - 69.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-b4a40fc5-f3c8-4ef9-8cd9-221ecea6e97c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.