Wplyw systemu utrzymania i zywienia na behawior rosnacych swin

• Autorzy: Kozera W , Karpiesiuk K. , Falkowski J.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The effect of housing and feeding systems on the behavior of growing-finishing pigs

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

EN

Słowa kluczowe

PL

trzoda chlewna; mieszance czterorasowe; utrzymanie zwierzat; systemy utrzymania zwierzat; utrzymanie sciolowe; utrzymanie bezsciolowe; zywienie zwierzat; zielonka z lucerny; mieszanki pelnoporcjowe; tuczniki; zachowanie sie zwierzat; pobieranie pokarmu; pobieranie wody; odpoczynek; aktywnosc ruchowa

EN

pig; half-breed; animal maintenance; maintenance system; animal feeding; lucerne meal; green fodder; feed mixture; fattener; animal behaviour; feed consumption; water consumption; rest; moving activity

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Zootechnica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 08
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.21-32,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kozera W

• Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul.Oczapowskiego 5, 10-718 Olsztyn

autor

Karpiesiuk K.

autor

Falkowski J.

Bibliografia

• Beattie V.E., O`Connel N.E., Moss B.W., 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behavior, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 65, 71–79.
• Danielsen V., Hansen L.L., Moller F., Bejerholm C., Nielsen S., 2000. Production results and sensory meat quality of pigs fed different amounts of concentrate and ad lib. Clover grass or clover grass silage. Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries. Proceeding from NJF seminar, Denmark 16–17.09, 79–86.
• Day J.E.L., Burfoot A., Docking C.M., Whittaker X., Spoodler H.A.M., Edwards S.A., 2002. The effect of prior experience of straw and the level of straw provision on the behavior of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76, 189–202.
• Day J.E.L., Van deWeerd H.A., Edwards S.A., 2008. The effect of varying lengths of straw bedding on the behavior of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109, 249–260.
• Dyrcz S., 1998. Wpływ technologii utrzymania i liczby odpasów na wyniki produkcyjne i zachowanie się tuczników. Rozpr. Hab., IZ Kraków.
• Elkmann A., Hoy S., 2009. Frequency of occupation with different simultaneously offered devices by fattening pigs kept in pen with or without straw. Livest. Sci. 124, 330–334.
• Falkowski J., Wernik A., 1998. Wyniki obserwacji stosowania systemu głębokiej ściółki w tuczu świń. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków 329 (53), 227–230.
• Falkowski J., Raubo B., 2007. Tempo wzrostu, parametry biochemiczne surowicy krwi i mięsność tusz tuczników w zależności od warunków chowu. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 3, 39–45.
• Guy J.H., Rowlinson P., Chadwick J.P., Ellis M., 2002. Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75, 193–206.
• Hill J.D.,McGlone J.J., Fullwood S.D.,Miller M.F., 1998. Environmental enrichment influences on pig behavior, performance and meat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 57, 51–68.
• Jordan D., Zgur S., Gorjanc G, Stuhec I., 2008. Straw or hay as environmental improvement and its effect on behawiour and production traits of fattening pigs. Arch. Tierz. 51 (6), 549–559.
• Klocek Cz., Koczanowski J., Nowicki J., Kalinowska B., 2005. Poziom aktywności jako wskaźnik komfortu bytowego w chowie świń. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 1 (3), 555–559.
• Klocek Cz., Madej T., 2008. Obserwacje zachowania się tuczników utrzymywanych w dwóch rodzajach kojców ściołowych. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 7 (3–4), 35–44.
• Kozera W., 2007. Efektywność tuczu i zachowanie się tuczników w zależności od systemu utrzymania i żywienia. Rozp. i Mon. 128, UWM Olsztyn.
• Labroue F., Gueblez R., Sellier P., Meunier-Salaun M.C., 1994. Feeding behaviour of group-housed Large White and Landrace pigs in French central test stations. Lives. Prod. Sci. 40 (3), 303–312.
• Li Y.Z., Johnston L.J., 2009. Behavior and performance of pigs previously housed in large groups. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 1472–1478.
• Lyons C.A.P., Bruce J.M., Fowler V.R., English P.R., 1995. A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Lives. Prod. Sci. 43, 265–274.
• Morrison R.S., Hemsworth P.H., Cronin G.M., Campbell R.G., 2003. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems.Appl.Anim. Behav. Sci. 82, 173–188.
• Morrison R.S., Johnston L.J., Hilbrands A.M., 2007. The behaviour, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing systems compared to a conventional confinement system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103, 12–24.
• Normy żywienia świń, 1993.Wartość pokarmowa pasz. Omnitech Press,Warszawa.
• Nowicki J., Klocek Cz., 2009. Obserwacje zachowania zwierząt gospodarskich – kilka uwag praktycznych. Prz. Hod. 7, 26–29.
• Peeters E., Driessen B., Moons C.P.H., Odberg F.O., Geers R., 2006. Effects of temporary straw bedding on pigs behaviour, performance, cortisol and meat quality.Appl.Anim. Behav. Sci. 98, 234–248.
• Rachuonyo H.A., Allen V.G., McGlone J.J., 2005. Behavior, preference for, and use of alfalfa, tall fescue, white clover, and buffalograss by pregnant gilts in an outdoor production system. J. Anim. Sci. 83, 2225–2234.
• Scott K., Chennells D.J., Campbell F.M. Hunt B., Armstrong D., Tylor L., Gill B.P., Edwards S.A., 2006 a. The welfare of finishing pigs in two contrasting housing systems: Fully-slated versus straw-bedded accommodation. Lives. Prod. Sci. 103, 104–115.
• Scott K., Taylor L., Gill B.P., Edwards S.A., 2006 b. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behavior of finishing pigs in two different housing systems.1. Hanging toy versus rootable substrate. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 99, 222–229.
• Scott K., Taylor L., Gill B.P., Edwards S.A., 2007. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behavior of finishing pigs in two different housing systems. 2. Ratio of pigs to enrichment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 105, 51–58.
• Scott K., Taylor L., Gill B.P., Edwards S.A., 2009. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behavior of finishing pigs in two different housing systems.1. Hanging toy versus rootable toy of the same material. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 116, 186–190.
• Stern S., Andresen N., 2003. Performance, site preference, foraging and excretory behaviour in relation to feed allowance of growing pigs on pasture. Lives. Prod. Sci. 79, 257–265.
• Street B.R., Gonyou H.W., 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 982–991.
• Stolba A., Wood-Gush D.G.M., 1989. The behaviour of pigs in semi-natural environment. Anim. Prod. 48 (2), 419–425.
• Sundrum A., 2001. Organic livestock farming. A critical reviev. Lives. Prod. Sci. 67, 207–216.
• Tuyttens F.A.M., 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92, 261–282.
• Van deWeerd H.A., Docking C.M., Day J.L., Breuer K., Edwards S.A., 2006. Effects of species-relevant enviromantal enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs. Appl.Anim. Behav. Sci. 99, 230–247.
• Van deWeerd H.A., Day J.E.I., 2009. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 116, 1–20.
• Van Putten G., 2000. An ethological definition of animal welfare with special emphasis on pig behaviour. Proceedings of Second NAHWOAWorkshop. http:///www.veeru. reading.ac.uk.
• Vargas Vargas J., Craing J.V., Hines R.H., 1987. Effects of feeding systems on social and feeding behavior and performance of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 65, 463–474.
• Webster A.J.F., 2001. Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and Free Market. J. Vet. 161, 229–237.
• Wechsler B., 1995. Coping and coping strategies: a behavioural view. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43, 123–134.
• Wiesemüller W., 1982. Lucerne silage as a source of amino acids in sows nutrition. Pig News Inf. 3 (2), 149–156.
• Wood-Gush D.G.M., Vestergaard K., Volker Petersen H., 1990. The significance of motivation and environment in the development of exploration in pigs. Biol. Behav. 15, 39–52.